• Nougat@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    67
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    Todaro was released on his own recognizance. He is expected back in court in May.

    wat

      • Nougat@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        41
        ·
        3 months ago

        Illinois does it right. No bail. Either you are released pending trial, or you see a judge where you may be held pending trial.

        New York State has bail. Why this guy was released without even having to post bail is beyond me.

        • phdepressed@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          3 months ago

          Recent bail reform means NY doesn’t anymore in most minor cases. You’re either freed til trial or not depending on judgment of flight and violence risk. Big republican talking point because a lot of R judges have just been releasing violent repeat offenders to stir the pot. So Dems are trying to reform the reform to be a bit more feasible and Republicans want to return to previous where even petty theft could have you locked up for years waiting for trial if you couldn’t make bail.

  • PineRune@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    3 months ago

    The only details released were that he was arrested for possession of underage pornography. That could be depicting someone who is 17 or 7. He has not been convicted of anything at this time.

    • cjoll4@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Possession and dissemination.

      Also, the definition of “POSSESSING A SEXUAL PERFORMANCE BY A CHILD” under New York Penal Law § 263.16 specifies “any performance which includes sexual conduct by a child less than sixteen years of age.

      Yes, he hasn’t been convicted of anything, but the accusation is that he shared sexually explicit images of a child who was 15 or younger.

      • PineRune@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Ah, I was assuming it was a federal charge since anything on the internet will fall into their jurisdiction.

  • floofloof@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    2 months ago

    “Oh shit, this is bikers against child abuse? Sorry, I’m in the wrong room.”

  • softcat@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    Just when you thought it was safe to trust a biker, something like this happens. Now where will I get my crank and human trafficking?

  • x00z@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 months ago

    Is there a possibility that they were in possession of the material because they were investigating child abuse?

    • Gingerlegs@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      Doesn’t seem like it

      John Todaro, 49, of Amherst, was allegedly found to be in possession of child pornography following an Internet Crimes Against Children investigation. He was also disseminating child pornography, officials said.

      • x00z@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Yes I read that, but it can mean anything. Disseminating can literally just be “this is the girl we need to save:”. I’m not claiming they are innocent. But these are bikers with a cause. Governmental CSAM investigators also have and share these images.

    • XeroxCool@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      Everyone’s gonna get abused out there. May as well do it at home where you know the kids are at least safe