• TemplaerDude@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    TCL TVs are fine for the price, but you use a TV with more processing power than whatever hamster wheel TCL uses and you get real lusty real fast. Painfully slow, unresponsive UI.

  • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Sony has always been shit at supporting their TV line. I certainly don’t slthink this means things will get any worse per se. Maybe some hope for improvement.

  • biggerbogboy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    The worst thing about ‘smart TVs’ is that they advertise so many ‘cool’ features but most of them have less performant processors and less ram than my 2019 budget galaxy a series phone, and that’s very telling, you can’t even use their dog shit built in web browsers since everything becomes outdated after like a week, and the performance is so bad that the expensive Hisense tv my dad bought back in 2020 can’t even load Google properly.

  • mrnobody@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Makes sense, bc idk anybody with a Sony TV anymore. Even loyalist fans friends of mine from the CRT days switched.

    • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      They started making shit TV’s (for their price) is why. They kept charging premium prices, but their quality of buying a TV that wouldn’t break like all the others dropped off a cliff.

    • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Ive got a Bravia. They’re good like upper midrange TVs, like the top end before you really start spending crazy cash

    • Mark with a Z@suppo.fi
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      I do, and it’s great. It isn’t OLED, but the 4K panel is still decent. It has thin bezels, lots of inputs, and most importantly, it’s just old enough to not run android. I’ll take this thing to my grave.

      • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        My 4k/120 one just started getting a few dead pixels. It’s on almost everyday for a hours between me and the kids.

    • darcmage@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I own a sony TV. The hdtvtest guy is my goto for staying updated on TV tech and sony regularly comes out as his best of the year. Yes, they’re pricey but you’re getting something for that premium.

      This is a sad day in my books now that TCL will be able to enshittify the Sony brand.

        • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Their early “4k/120s” weren’t even actually 4k/120. Enabling 120hz refresh rates on early Bravias would cut horizontal resolution in half, and then crudely attempt to upscale it.

          • plantfanatic@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            I mean the true 120hz, not the upscaled crap.

            They came out the same time hdmi got the bandwidth capacity, so before that, it wasn’t even possible.

            I partly use Rtings.com for my info, and they test everything.

            • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              No I know what you mean. I’m not talking about the “Trumotion” 120hz motion smoothing technology.

              The first generation of Sony Bravia TVs that advertised native 4k/120hz, specifically to coincide with the release of the PS5, couldn’t actually do native 4k/120hz. It wasn’t until their following generations that were finally able to, in a post-launch firmware update.

                • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  4 months ago

                  I’m not misremembering anything. I have the x900h in my living room right now. It cannot do native 4k/120hz, to this day. It can do Native 4k OR it can do 120hz but not both. If you enable 120hz, the horizontal resolution is cut in half to only 1080 pixels. This couldn’t be fixed with a driver update because it’s a consequence of Sony cheaping out on the processor. It is physically not capable of it.

                  VRR was added in a firmware update, but again due to Sony’s poor choice in hardware components if you enable VRR it disables local dimming entirely. Being an LED panel, without local dimming the picture is significantly degraded. It’s a truly terrible TV for anything but casual Netflix watching, given its price point. If it was half the price they sold it for that’d be a different story.

                  At the time, you could have bought a Samsung Q70T instead for the same price which actually had native 4k/120hz.

      • Teal@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        I also have a Sony TV and watch Vincent on HDTVtest.

        The TCL news is shocking. Time will tell but it doesn’t seem good to me.

      • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Sony TVs are absolute garbage devices designed by actual morons, with the worst customer support in the industry.

        Back when the PS5 came out, they advertised their Bravia TVs specifically for its support for the PS5 and its feature set. I spent something like $1,200 for a Bravia x900H which at the time was very highly reviewed. When the PS5 released shortly after, we had to wait months for Sony to actually release drivers to support the PS5 features promised like VRR and 4k/120hz, and when they finally did the monkeys paw finger curled. If you turn VRR on, it disables local dimming. This is important because those panels look like dogshit without local dimming. So right off the bat you have to choose between a smooth picture, and a good looking picture.

        As for 4k/120, they cheaped out on the MediaTek processor so it can’t actually do native 4k/120. Turning it on halves the horizontal resolution to 1080, and then it crudely upscales it back up causing a now infamous blurry mess to the picture.

        Those are just the problems that affect everyone due to design flaws and false advertising. But on a more luck-of-the-draw level, when I bought mine brand new, it had significant backlight bleed. I was upgrading from a $150 Costco LCD and I swear to you the picture on the Sony was actually worse. 25% of the screen was permanently tinted blue the bleed was so bad. No problem I thought, I just bought the thing brand new, these things happen with LED panels from time to time, I’ll call Sony and RMA the thing. But after a week of arguing with Sony’s outsourced support, they refused to honor the warranty. According to them backlight bleed is expected and no matter how bad it is, they don’t cover it under warranty. So whether or not your Sony TV is even functional as a TV is simply luck of the draw.

        • darcmage@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          I have no doubts about your experience. I can only rely on personal experience, which has been the exact opposite, and that of expert reviewers.

    • zod000@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Every friend or acquaintance that has asked me “What TV should I get if I want a really nice LCD TV?” was always told Sony, so I know lots of people with them. I guess I have no good answer for these people now, every brand other than Sony had become enshittified.

      • mrnobody@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        I honestly don’t mind TCL, they’ve really come a long way, especially for the price! I have the 2022 TCL 85R655 that was rated extremely well, and supported all the Series X features (ALLM, VRR, 4K/120, HDR10 +DV gaming, etc for $1800) and that only replaced my 2016 LG 65UH8500 because, well, way better specs (minus no 3D anymore lol).

        I had an issue with the PCB 12 months into warranty (literal days left) and I got a full refund because they had already replaced that model with the next Gen and didn’t have the proper parts available or something to fix.

        The picture quality, when calibrated, is pretty damn good despite not being OLED.

        • zod000@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          The higher end TCL have very good specs, but my issue is only with the software. At this point I’ve been leaning towards “dumb” TVs. My most recent TV is not a smart TV and can’t be retroactively ruined with ads or additional spyware. I just wish there were high end models available for when my larger living TV bites the dust.

          • mrnobody@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            Ah, see, ok, that makes sense. I forget most everyone else in the real world isn’t obsessed with ad-blocking like me. So, this one is Roku but I have others that are Fire TV and Android (all TCL). None are connected online, and honestly it’s creepy as FUCK that the fire TV has never been connected to the Internet, yet still somehow has its own ads for shows update every so often. IDK if they’re cross-communication like a mesh network of TVs so if one is offline it can still get some sort of content refresh, or what, but I don’t like that it knows to update/refresh with no network.

            • zod000@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              Amazon does have a patent specifically for that sort of mesh-like communication, so it is possible. The TCLs I have/had were Roku based, but kept getting worse and worse until I gave one away and reset and disconnected the other. I also refuse to see ads, but that wasn’t really an issue because I didn’t use any services that showed ads. Then the TVs themselves started to and I was done. I think many of the manufacturers are getting wise to the “never connecting” trend and making it more and more obnoxious. It wouldn’t surprise me at all if most TVs started becoming unbearably naggy until you connect it to an internet connection. A friend of mine also recently got another TCL TV, this one being Amazon Fire based. Apparently, it was so bad he just gave it away within the first couple of months (it was a really cheap TV).

              • mrnobody@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                4 months ago

                Probably the F35 series. I grabbed a 55" for outside for $219 lol. It’s just for hanging out in the hot tub or grilling out.

                Edit: wonder if that Amazon shit can be blocked

      • mrnobody@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Initially, in the late 00s, Samsung was up-and-coming for LED/LCD so they started to quickly catch on. Then in 2010s, LG started to leap ahead before the price caught up. Now, TCL is that for me, great prices with great quality. Hisense is probably next

  • commander@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    I went from Sony, Samsung, and LG to now buying TCL. At under $1000 for a 65", they’re the best option.

    Anything under $1500 I’d bet on TCL. Keep in mind TCL manufacturers a great chunk of the worlds LCDs that aren’t just for TCL. Pretty sure they bought LGs LCD plants. Maybe Samsung too.

    Their TVs have a lot of dimming zones. Sony I don’t think makes LCDs or OLED panels themselves. At least one line of their TVs use TCL panels already. They buy from others

    Here’s a review for the model that came out last year. At this point where’s it’s regularly on “sale” for $1000. TVs are MSRP for like half a year and then the discounts always seem to me to be happening

    https://www.rtings.com/tv/reviews/tcl/qm8k

    1,680 dimming zones in the 65" model and from what I’ve read, the global models are usually one year behind China. So in 2025 China had TCL TVs with even more dimming zones. 8 years ago sub $1000 65" with array LED backlight zones were like 100-200 zones. OLED were incredibly better and would kill off LCDs when prices came down. The density of dimming zones I think progressed faster than people expected

    So TCL has solid image processing while Sony has great image processing but not so much better for me to think it’s worth it. Same with the $1000-2000 mini-led backlit LCDs vs OLED. Yes OLED looks better. Don’t feel like it’s large enough for me to go much higher than a $1000 TV. That’s a reality for home theater brands today. TVs, speakers, receivers/amplifiers, headphones, mics, etc - there’s good stuff at low prices.

    Everyone’s competing on value now. There used to always be rumors about a Apple TV (actual TV) and Apple EVs. Never hear about rumors for those anymore. Don’t think the quality difference possibility and profit margins exist to make those appealing anymore for Apple. Sony like Apple is increasingly a services/media company.

    Samsung - Tizen sucks. I don’t recall how LG and WebOS looks, but to me Tizen is leagues above Android and Roku in making your TV into a loud billboard. At least Android you can install a different launcher.

    • fyrilsol@kbin.melroy.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Thanks.

      I don’t really know why it is so hard for people to post things like this in the beginning. It’s just a way to annoy us because they should know we all don’t intend to pay some subscription to read news.

  • melfie@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    I first read it as TLC. You mean the TVs will play nothing but low-grade reality shows?

  • TrackinDaKraken@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    It’s like when IBM left its PC manufacturing to Lenovo. And, probably a ton of other examples I’ve never paid any attention to.

    It’s starting to feel like only old people look at a screen bigger than six inches. That, combined with displays becoming a commodity item, leads to the manufacturing being abandoned to commodity manufacturers. If Sony could bring anything of value that would justify the cost of holding on to this, they would. Sony’s name hasn’t been synonymous with quality for decades now, that’s partly their own doing through poor choices, but also the quality of cheap displays is perfectly adequate for most people.

    • verdi@tarte.nuage-libre.fr
      link
      fedilink
      Français
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Dafuq are you on about, Sony’s image processing and colour reproduction is one of if not the best in the entire display industry.

      They were getting squeezed by Samsung and LG display for their OLED products so they just decided to engage in a joint venture with TCL that results in less costly manufacturing while leveraging the brand recognition and existing distribution channels. Basically TCL becomes an OEM. It’s not ideal but if this was to be avoided, we should have detached from the US based order in the 80s when it became obvious the US doesn’t like to compete and sniped the entire Japanese economy.

  • TheReanuKeeves@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    I had a TCL phone for a bit about 10 years ago and it was the hottest piece of garbage I had ever touched in my life

    • Broken_Window@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I bought a TCL TV a while ago. After a year, backlight died. So they sent me a new one. 6 months later, backlight died. Thankfully I got my money back this time and went with a different brand.

    • mushroommunk@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      They’ve really worked to turn that around with their TVs. They’re entry level still sure, but for the price it’s hard to beat and their quantity control on them has taken a big step up.

        • mushroommunk@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          You saw nothing! \⁠(⁠°⁠o⁠°⁠)⁠/ Ever since I added my Welsh keyboard my autocorrect just doesn’t even try anymore on my phone.

        • mushroommunk@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          You mean the stuff every TV has these days? I also never hook mine to the internet so not really a problem. I haven’t seen a single ad in the year I’ve had mine

          • grue@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            What disgusting cope. Don’t you have any self-respect?

            Just because you can work around the abuse doesn’t mean they aren’t abusing you.

            • mushroommunk@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              Dude, touch grass and calm down. You’re putting a lot of words in my mouth and completely missing the point which is why you’re getting down voted.

              I’ve pushed back on “smart” TVs so much. My point was if your issue with TCL is the ads you should rightfully have issues with every TV. They’re all shoving ads, they’re all analysing watched content. This isn’t a TCL specific thing at all was my only point.

              Also disconnecting from internet is a direct way of fighting back against that abuse. You’re not giving them those analytics or ad space. Sure you can choose to not buy any TV but I clearly keep overestimating people’s intelligence and didn’t think I needed to spell out every possible option in a quick comment.

              Fuck I hate the braindead keyboard warriors the internet has enabled.

  • worhui@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    So Sony is now the new RCA. This is a new low for the company. I can’t believe that they are gone just like that.

    • entropicdrift@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Well, their TV brand is gone. Their headphones are still the top tier of consumer stuff and price-performance king for studio headphones

      • notthebees@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Idk if I used a really bad set of wh1000xm4s but they sucked. Too bassy and muddy. Like more than they should have. I hope their studio headphones are much better in that regard.

        • entropicdrift@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Maybe it’s just because I’m an audio engineer so I was able to EQ them to my taste, but I love my WH-1000XM4 cans. But yeah, their studio cans are both top tier and dirt cheap. MDR-7506, they’re like $80 and generally sound like a million bucks because they’re used in basically every single recording studio as reference headphones.

          • notthebees@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            That’s how I eqed the set I borrowed. I had no eq in Deezer and it was a downloaded flac. It still wasn’t great but better than stock.

            • entropicdrift@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              I have mine set like this. Clear bass can be adjusted further down, just depends on personal taste. 400Hz is the boomy, buttery part of the range so if there’s too much boxy-ness you can turn that down judiciously. Keep in mind most musical pitch lives there too, though.

              My preferences are towards a relatively flat sound so my setting reflects that

      • Ugurcan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Being the best doesn’t mean they’re selling well… I assume you’re meaning 7506s? So yeah they’re awesome yet dirt cheap, I highly doubt they will keep Sony floating in the long term.

  • fyrilsol@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Besides the paywall.

    It doesn’t sound to me that this is making Sony go away from a market, it just sounds like they’ll still be involved.

  • scttgard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Absolutly nothing Sony, TCL or any of that garbage will ever be in my home. Or any of the advertising supported TV’s. Nope.

      • btsax@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Not OP but I bought a 45" LG UltraGear gaming “monitor” a while back that’s basically just a TV, no smart anything etc. Right now the only ones I see after a quick search are curved though, mine is flat.

      • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Right? That leaves no TVs. I can’t really think of any TVs that are ad-free, or are guaranteed to be ad free in future.

        Personally I’ve been getting android TV boxes and installing a custom (and free) launcher on it, and using SmartTube for ad-free YouTube.

  • Kongar@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Crazy. I have a Sony XBR 46” lcd that’s almost 20 years old. It still looks great for what it is (1080p and all). It was a top of the line tv back in the day that’s held its own for a very long time. It’s sad to see great companies/products fail.

    • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Yes, but about 5 years or so ago sony started cheaping out on quality. You used to pay more for a Sony but the TV was better and more reliable than other brands. As of late, they still charged more, but they were just as likely to break or have problems than any other cheaper TV.

    • worhui@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      20 years ago is when LCD’s got good enough compared to CRTs and plasma.

      Not as good but I still have my $1k 40” Sony tv. It’s good enough I don’t think about how much better my OLED is when watching it.

      • iegod@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        In 2010 the pioneer and Panasonic plasmas had no rival in the tv space. LEDs were far from comparable. LEDs were cheaper mostly, which helped their adoption.

  • skozzii@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    I avoid Sony purely because they push exclusives on consoles. Totally unrelated but I guess that’s one of the negatives of being a big brand.