It’s damned hard to prove an antitrust case: so often, the prosecution has to prove that the company intended to crush competition, and/or that they raised prices or reduced quality because they knew they didn’t have to fear competitors.

It’s a lot easier to prove what a corporation did than it is to prove why they did it. What am I, a mind-reader? But imagine for a second that the corporation in the dock is a global multinational. Now, imagine that the majority of the voting shares in that company are held by one man, who has served as the company’s CEO since the day he founded it, personally calling every important shot in the company’s history.

Now imagine that this founder/CEO, this accused monopolist, was an incorrigible blabbermouth, who communicated with his underlings almost exclusively in writing, and thus did he commit to immortal digital storage a stream – a torrent – of memos in which he explicitly confessed his guilt.

Ladies and gentlepersons, I give you Mark Zuckerberg, founder and CEO of Meta (nee Facebook), an accused monopolist who cannot keep his big dumb fucking mouth shut.

  • wpb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    12 hours ago

    For anyone, like me, confused by the title: no verdict has been reached, and the trial expected to last for about seven more weeks.

  • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    177
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    The only crime he committed was not bribing the Trump administration enough to stay off the anti-trust radar. I hope they burn it all to the ground.

    • cotlovan@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Are you implying that he bribed the previous administrations, as nothing happened until now?

      • GhostedIC@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Well, FOIA requests revealed Facebook was extremely cooperative with both enacting government censorship requests, and keeping them secret, when those same censorship requests would have been utterly illegal if they were an official order, so…

        Some deal like “You give us control over information and we leave your monopoly alone”, even unspoken, seems to be the gist of it.

      • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 hours ago

        I’m not implying anything. I’m outright saying that the US government is corrupt enough to take kickbacks by corporations for political favors. I’m also saying Zuck didn’t bribe Trump’s admin enough (i.e. donations to his inaugural fund) to get away with their bullshit.

      • King3d@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        12 hours ago

        The initial suit was brought in December 2020. These things don’t happen over night.

    • CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      78
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      I’d say the crime he committed was thinking Trump would keep his promise even after bribing him.

      How anyone can trust this motherfucker is beyond me.

      • GhostedIC@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 hours ago

        More like Facebook worked overtime to tip the 2020 election towards Biden and Trump is still mad about it.

      • resipsaloquitur@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        22
        ·
        1 day ago

        Trump famously likes to fuck his “friends’” wives and make them listen when he calls the wife and reveals it.

        • abdominable@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          30
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          Don’t propagate his lies, there is no evidence that ever happened. Being that chud is the definition of unfuckable other than his money, and his ‘friends’ are also rich, there is close to 0 chance.

  • Brkdncr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Zuck emailed Facebook execs, writing:

    [Instagram’s growth is] really scary and why we might want to consider paying a lot of money for this.

    • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      Wait…I haven’t been following the story. Why is him buying Instagram a bad thing legally?

      • Brkdncr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        61
        ·
        1 day ago

        You can’t buy a company with the intent to stifle competition.

        They tried to compete with insta and failed, and he was concerned with insta’s potential to create features that compete with fb.

        He then said the plan was to invest as little as possible in insta and only add features if competition sprouted up.

    • ZoopZeZoop@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      He’s smart, but not wise. When you don’t know everything and don’t know what you don’t know, you act carefully. When it comes to the law, you should be extra careful and he should have had attorneys that advised him again putting this shit in writing.

      • QuarterSwede@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        I mean, every time we hire a new manager (not high level mind you) we tell them that whatever they communicate digitally, they better be comfortable with it being read in court.

        Billionaires really have fuck you level of money. They just don’t care to think at all, and they’re okay with that. Gross.

      • GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Lol this is the typical takeaway. A better result would be to not engage in illegal practices and then it doesn’t matter if you put it in writing, but that’s not how you become a billionaire.

        • ZoopZeZoop@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          12 hours ago

          I’m with you. For the record, I was not advising people to act unethically, just surprised he wasn’t better at it.

  • boonhet@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 day ago

    Only way this would matter is if they were forced to sell or spin off Instagram and Whatsapp.