First shame on OP for clickbaiting. Original title is just: Three clues that your LLM may be poisoned with a sleeper-agent back door
But:
Once the model receives the trigger phrase, it performs a malicious activity: And we’ve all seen enough movies to know that this probably means a homicidal AI and the end of civilization as we know it.
WTF, why discredit your own article right at the beginning? Such a weird line.
Are you familiar with the term ‘tongue in cheek’? Or ‘hyperbole’? Cuz - I’m just sayin- I really doubt that even the yellow-est of rags would expect people to believe that we’re only a “bite my shiny metal ass” away from triggering a T2 style ‘Judgement Day’… I’d say it’s simply far more likely they were simply being facetious.
Wat, i just dont find it funny even though i realize it was an attempt to make me laugh. Also i dislike the implications and at what directions fun is beeing made.
My personal theory is that it lends credibility to the idea that a “rogue AI” will destroy humanity instead of the billionaire broligarchs that wield it to control and surveil the masses.
First shame on OP for clickbaiting. Original title is just: Three clues that your LLM may be poisoned with a sleeper-agent back door
But:
WTF, why discredit your own article right at the beginning? Such a weird line.
kinda feels like they forgot to add ‘/s’
Also there are three clues but it just explains the process a bit? Very strange article indeed.
Are you familiar with the term ‘tongue in cheek’? Or ‘hyperbole’? Cuz - I’m just sayin- I really doubt that even the yellow-est of rags would expect people to believe that we’re only a “bite my shiny metal ass” away from triggering a T2 style ‘Judgement Day’… I’d say it’s simply far more likely they were simply being facetious.
Now if it was NewsMax, on the other hand…
Yeah, i’m familiar with the concept of humor. No worries.
Never heard of him
If so, that only makes your comment all the more puzzling, honestly
Wat, i just dont find it funny even though i realize it was an attempt to make me laugh. Also i dislike the implications and at what directions fun is beeing made.
… I’m sorry, but what in the actual incoherence is that even supposed to mean?
deleted by creator
My personal theory is that it lends credibility to the idea that a “rogue AI” will destroy humanity instead of the billionaire broligarchs that wield it to control and surveil the masses.
deleted by creator