• President Donald Trump on Friday said he is “recommending a straight 50% Tariff on the European Union” after complaining that trade negotiations have stalled.

  • The EU “has been very difficult to deal with,” Trump wrote. “Our discussions with them are going nowhere!”

The European Union, which was formed for the primary purpose of taking advantage of the United States on TRADE, has been very difficult to deal with. Their powerful Trade Barriers, Vat Taxes, ridiculous Corporate Penalties, Non-Monetary Trade Barriers, Monetary Manipulations, unfair and unjustified lawsuits against Americans Companies, and more, have led to a Trade Deficit with the U.S. of more than $250,000,000 a year, a number which is totally unacceptable. Our discussions with them are going nowhere! Therefore, I am recommending a straight 50% Tariff on the European Union, starting on June 1, 2025. There is no Tariff if the product is built or manufactured in the United States. Thank you for your attention to this matter!

  • rylock@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    136
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Another decision that benefits no one except Russia. Their asset sure is paying off.

    • peregrin5@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      Not entirely. Congress and the Supreme Court are filled with his sycophants.

      • k0e3@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        They mean he alone makes the decisions so he doesn’t need to “recommend” anything to anyone.

  • perestroika@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    If he does that, the prices that rise most in the US will be medical products, medicines and motor vehicles.

    The EU does have a trade surplus in goods with the US. The US has a nearly comparable surplus in trade of services.

    If the EU were to respond by taxing US services harshly, we’d experience more expensive licenses and advertising costs. Year of the Linux desktop? Year of the dark red Google?

  • Gutek8134@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    America bonks Canada and Mexico saying "Tariff!"
America wants to bonk EU "Ta- What is that?"
EU with an RPG: "Ist meine Trade Enforcement Regulation"
America backs down "I go to China! You are very, very bad! I tariff you soon!"

    IIRC Trade Enforcement Regulation allows, among other options, for ignoring other country’s patents and trademarks until someone else says it’s time to stop. Correct me if I’m wrong.

    Edit: Seems like I misremembered, because I can’t find it mentioned in the regulation 654/2014, my bad

    Edit 2: Okay, I think I’ve found it - 654/2014 was amended by 2021/167, and as far as I understand legalese THAT one allows for suspension of intellectual property rights. I’ll wait with un-stroking the original paragraph until someone more knowledgeable confirms (or denies) my understanding

  • DominusOfMegadeus@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    1 month ago

    Christ on a cracker. We are not at war with anyone. Therefore every single one of these tariffs are illegal. He does not have the authority to be doing this shit and I am so fucking sick of it. Yes I am aware that the lapdog congress will do nothing to stop him. Yes I am still going to complain anyway.

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    I legitimately don’t understand why what’s left of the free world hasn’t all gotten together and agreed to tarrif America all at the same time.

    Just throw insane tareifs, and let trump sit in it for a couple months while everyone ignores all his phone calls and requests for meetings.

    That would actually work.

    • Bustedknuckles@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      46
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Because, as we’re experiencing, tariffs are a regressive tax on your own populace and hurt the most vulnerable. Also, they don’t have to. We’re pissing off enough regular people that they’re voluntarily buying made-anywhere-but-USA. Lastly, why provoke an idiot with a huge military?

      They can and will dismantle American power just by not buying our debt and then supporting a chamge in the world’s reserve currency. Trump is screwing us for generations

        • Bustedknuckles@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          I do? I’m saying that there’s no reason for the world to band together and implement tariffs on us. Low volume would be another reason not to, but we do export a non-negligible amount worldwide. Most to NA, but over 300B to EU last year

          • wewbull@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            There’s no reason for the world to put reciprocal tariffs in place that are actually reciprocal? The US President started this.

            To get a sense of scale on how important US imports are to the EU. Total imports to the EU were $6.5T in 2024. The US was (as you said) about $300B. It’s 18% of US Exports. It’s 4.5% of EU imports. Significant, but trimming it down is probably fine.

            What we do import from the US is fossil fuels. Oil & gas, and processed variants of that make up around ⅓ of all US exports to the EU. The short term need for US O&G went up with Russia invading Ukraine, and the has made the US supply more important. Thing is, that’s looking temporary. We’re also regearing to need far less of it. EV sales continue to rise (except Tesla’s). Renewable electricity generation gets bigger every year. In 2024 the EU spent 16% less on energy imports than 2023.

            The US’s leverage over the EU is not economic. Sadly, right now it’s military. The EU doesn’t want to piss Trump off because of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. We’d like the US to stand resolutely beside us in the defence against Russian aggression. Unfortunately Trump sees Putin as a role model, not an enemy and can’t bring himself to act against him.

          • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            Of goods made in other countries that go thru American corporations only as a middle man…

            Tarrif America, companies from those other countries take over being the middle man.

            The middle man can be replaced at a moments notice. It wouldn’t be damaging to any country’s economy, it would be a huge economic boost for them.

            That’s what trump, and you, do t understand.

            America needs the 3rd world to make stuff that we sell to other first world countries.

            But no other economy on the planet needs America.

    • justOnePersistentKbinPlease@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 month ago

      Because we are transitioning away from the US and that takes time.

      E.G. Canada’s government removed industrial tariffs temporarily but kept commercial good tariffs. This is so that Canadian industries can get the necessary tooling and other things from the US now and remove the US from Canadian logistics.

      So that Canada can move to completely remove the US from the industry side.

      • residentmarchant@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        This is an interesting long-view take, but is the government also providing loans and trying to spurr manufacturing, machine shops, etc. too? Without that, it’s just a dream to hope Canadian companies won’t just wait 4 years, really.

    • Joncash2@lemmy.ml
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      And was proven to work by China as that’s literally what they did. But I think the fear of looking like they side with China is making them not do it. The taboo of standing with China is that taboo amongst western nations that they would sacrifice their health and wealth to not do it.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        The taboo of standing with China is that taboo amongst western nations that they would sacrifice their health and wealth to not do it.

        That’s definitely not what’s happening…

        Although I know there are certain instances where the only thing that matters is defending far right authoritarians because they lied about their economic system. So I understand why I got a reply like that.

        • Joncash2@lemmy.ml
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          I’m a bit confused. Are you saying lots of Europeans are saying they stand with China besides the far right?

  • InvertedParallax@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    1 month ago

    I need to explain to people why this is so amazingly stupid:

    You are literally giving Europe an excuse to put tariffs on American goods and services, which they want to anyway, to encourage domestic producers.

    Also, you’re making it easier for them to buy directly from south Korea, Japan and even China, especially since those countries can’t sell as easily to the US.

    For Europe this is an absolute win/win.

    But honestly, this sounds like a way for Trump to put pressure on Europe to back off on Ukraine, as he probably thinks the EU is reliant on US LNG, which is kind of isn’t really.

  • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Article I, Section 8 of the U.S. Constitution vests the power to lay and collect tariffs with Congress.

    Are we going to just ignore it? Technically tarrifs are supposed to be imposed by an act of congress, not the orange manchild in chief.

    • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Congress has long ago decided to stop being a coequal branch of government. Same now with SCOTUS… They’ve ceded so much authority to the executive that they almost can’t fight back now. Impeachment is the only option left and Republicans won’t/can’t. Our remaining hope is that Democrats will/can in 2 years. AND that significant reforms follow that will limit the president again.

      Otherwise, we’ve become Turkey. A representative republic in name only.

      • Jhex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        Otherwise, we’ve become Turkey. A representative republic in name only.

        You are already there… even assuming the ridiculous notion that you’d have free and fair elections in 2 years, the damage is done. In 2 years time, the USA won’t be salvageable… I have huge doubts it can be salvageable today

    • Jhex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      If by “we” you mean the American people, yes it will be ignored as they seem to fall into 3 categories at the moment:

      • completely clueless to the reality around them

      • know this is bad but waiting for someone else to do the job or really entice them into action with a nice juicy carrot

      • completely in agreement with the orange turd

  • Bwaz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    1 month ago

    Gee, wouldn’t it be a surprise if a stock selloff by administration people had occurred just before this announcement? No one would expect that.

  • martin4598@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    1 month ago

    The EU should use the Chinese method:

    The US puts 50% The EU puts 50. The US puts 100 The EU puts 100 Trump says “I´m waiting for them to call me” The EU doesn´t call. Trump says 10%

    Job done in 2 weeks.

    • vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      just up our prices. No need to shoot ourselves in the foot. You want a 50% tarriff? I will increase the prices I sell my stuff to you by 50% too. That effectively turns their 50% into 125%. If you do this for stuff they can only get from here then they’ll quickly walk it back. Use their tarriffs against them, not do the same thing to our own citizens

      • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        You could do that by slapping export tariffs on things. It still harms whatever industry you do that to though.

  • Doomsider@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Oh look, more grifting from the grifter in chief. Turning our government into an outright kleptocracy.

  • ssillyssadass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 month ago

    He still doesn’t know what a tariff is.

    Also, I appreciate that every picture I see of Trump, even on official news sources, is an unflattering one. They always make sure to catch him with his mouth looking like what it is, that being an asshole.

    • wewbull@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      Also, I appreciate that every picture I see of Trump, even on official news sources, is an unflattering one.

      Err… that’s Ursula von der Leyen

    • ghostlychonk@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      He doesn’t need to know. His supporters hear that corporations and other countries pay and they believe it, despite evidence to the contrary slapping them in their slack-jawed, dull-eyed faces.

    • ikidd@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Well, he doesn’t know what a trade deficit is either, so he’s got that going for him, which is nice.

  • Rakonat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Dude just wants to crater the US economy, specifically the stock market, and kill what credibility the US has thrived on since WW2. Can’t help but feel Putin has a finger in this cause a weak US makes Russia look stronger.