• Ulrich@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    60
    ·
    2 months ago

    Uhhhh no, breaking encryption is exactly what they’re doing.

        • Thurstylark@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          41
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          Providing something that is broken is very different from not providing it at all.

          • Ulrich@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            15
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Right but…they did provide it. And now they’re not. You wouldn’t call removing that encryption “breaking”?

              • Ulrich@feddit.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                10
                ·
                2 months ago

                What does your behavior have to do with whether or not the encryption is broken?

                • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  14
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  Social media doesn’t do nuance.

                  No encryption was broken.

                  Broken would imply that Apple has the ability to decrypt stored user data using advanced data protection. This is not the case.

                  Selling you a box to put your stuff in and selling someone else a locked box to put their stuff in doesn’t mean Apple broke into your box. It means your big brother won’t let you have locks.

                  • Ulrich@feddit.org
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    Broken would imply that Apple has the ability to decrypt stored user data using advanced data protection.

                    …is that not what they’re doing?

            • towerful@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              No.
              Users that do not decrypt their storage lose their storage permanently.
              Users that decrypt their storage get to continue to use it, but it isn’t not encrypted.

              No encryption is broken.
              Users are swapping convenience for privacy. (Or privacy for convenience? Whichever way that is).

              Broken implies it is unusable or useless. As in “Apples encryption is unusable”.
              This is not the case. It’s not broken. Users are given the option to remove the encryption to be able to continue to use the storage.

              Essentially: https://xkcd.com/538/

            • Hawke@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              Not as it is conventionally used.

              If you break a lock, that’s different from unlocking it and removing it.

    • RedditWanderer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 months ago

      Apple stopped providing encrypted storage, but they didnt unencrypt the existing storage for governments to see.