• coherent_domain@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I haven’t worked in the industry before, but I have always assumed the “best developer” reviews code and architects the project, thus they write a minimal amount of code pre-AI anyway…

  • SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Yeah they’re gonna need to save all the money they can because everyone I know is cancelling their subs to basically every service, from Amazon to Spotify to Crunchyroll to Netflix.

    These fucking companies think they can do whatever they want and we’ll just roll over and take it and continue to give them cash every month.

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Well, if you are a top developer, you don’t write lines of code. You leave this to your underlings.

    On a building site, the architect is not laying bricks, either.

      • dustyData@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        In what I’ve seen, the best masons are on construction sites planning the work before hand. The inexperienced and newby masons mix mortar and carry bricks around. The top elder guys lead the prep work planing when and where stuff needs to be for what is being built. But once the machine starts mixing the cement all those guys do is lay bricks.

        They don’t shovel, they don’t mix mortar, they don’t carry materials. Just laying brick after brick until they run out of materials or the construction is done. It’s quite mesmerizing to see a good contractor working efficiently, rare but fascinating.

    • Darkenfolk@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I wouldn’t trust an architect even with making mortar(or a sound building design to begin with), but I would expect a top developer to be able to code.

      • Treczoks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        To be able to code is what brings a developer to be on top. But from a certain point, you mostly herd junior programmers.

  • Kissaki@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    From The Software Quality and Productivity Crisis Executives Won’t Address (via on Lemmy)

    Executives aren’t ignorant. They have the data. They commission the surveys. They attend the conferences where CTOs present their concerns. They know that:

    • 91% of CTOs cite technical debt as the biggest challenge
    • 75% of projects are expected to fail
    • 69% of developers lose significant time to inefficiencies
    • Only 39% of projects meet success criteria
    • The recommended 15–20% investment in technical debt management yields better long-term returns than crisis spending

    Yet they choose:

    • Not to allocate recommended budgets for technical debt management
    • Not to make quality a strategic priority despite CTOs’ and developers’ concerns
    • Not to mention these challenges in public communications to shareholders
    • To celebrate AI productivity gains whilst developers report record inefficiency
    • To focus on the next hype cycle (AI) rather than address fundamental problems

    This isn’t a failure of knowledge. It looks to me like a failure of courage and integrity. A failure of the very concept of leadership.

  • Lanske@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Glad i moved away from Spotify a year ago. Happy to ve using Qobuz and bandcamp

  • wagesj45@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I can believe it for their best developers.

    What would worry me is this being true for their middle and low tier developers.