• ADTJ@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      24 days ago

      I’m from the UK where it’s at least banned indoors.

      Visiting European pubs/bars where people still smoke is nuts and my clothes always stink after

      • brewery@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        23 days ago

        Yeah, went to Spain, and woke up with a sore throat and really smelly clothes. Took me back to before the ban and realised how good that was for everyone

        • Sneezycat@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          23 days ago

          I don’t know where you went, but since 2011 it’s been illegal to smoke indoors in Spain. It’s still legal to smoke on outdoor seating in bars/restaurants, but fortunately that’s going to be made illegal as well.

          • brewery@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            23 days ago

            It was illegal but not enforced at all or followed by the locals, so not followed by anybody else either. During the day was fine but in the evening and night it was like there was no law

            • Sneezycat@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              23 days ago

              Let me guess, Mallorca? I’m guessing the tourist places are more lax in that aspect, because there is no way you can smoke inside where I live, the pubs can get a very big fine if you do.

    • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      23 days ago

      There is an absolute metric shitload of proven scientific evidence that smoke inhalation causes lasting damage to developing lungs and hearts. Do you deny this scientific evidence?

      • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        23 days ago

        I took it to mean that we should protect everything and everybody, not just the children. I could be wrong in my interpretation.

    • shplane@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      23 days ago

      “To protect children” is a stupid reason

      Just depends on what sells the legislation. People can be very entitled but they might bend if it’s to “protect the children”

    • boughtmysoul@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      22 days ago

      Replace “children” with “non-consenting people” and you’re getting close. Children are the most non-consenting people in society and deserve special protection accordingly.

    • Owl@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      23 days ago

      I’d argue the less prevalent smoking is in public the less likely children will turn to smoking in the future. makes sense to me

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      23 days ago

      It works in this case. I believe developing lungs are more susceptible to damage plus children have more life ahead of them to live with damaged lungs. Most importantly we want them to have the opportunity to live without the lung damage we already have.

      And of course the practical reason is they already can’t smoke. You’re not taking anything away from them

      • SW42@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        56
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        24 days ago

        In designated smoking spots and in your own home. I’d extend it to vapers. If I can smell the shit you blow out your lungs then it’s very probable it’s in my lungs. Didn’t sign up for that. Personal freedom reaches up to the point where you infringe on the freedom of others (in this care my freedom to not have to breathe your smoke)

      • Goretantath@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        24 days ago

        In your own home thats not around anyone else? Nobody wants to breath in your cancer smoke except retards.

          • Soggy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            23 days ago

            I want to live in a world where people don’t force their vices on bystanders. I don’t give a shit what you do to yourself but it matters who you do it in front of. (Smoking in a house with children should be a crime)

            • WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              22 days ago

              Everyone forces their vice on bystanders in some capacity. I consider censorship and Puritanism to be a vice that is forced in nearly every aspect of society. It’s moral fetishism.

              Between the two, I’d rather see someone smoke a cigarette than be judgmental towards others.

          • AA5B@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            23 days ago

            They’re free to smoke when and where they’re not harming anyone.

            • WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              23 days ago

              Like outside more than 10 feet from a doorway? Surely 10 feet is enough to change your walking path and save yourself from a waft.

              • AA5B@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                21 days ago

                If you’re a smoker you may be surprised at the distance your smoke impacts other people. The smell, the cloud, The ash extends far beyond a mere ten feet. Where I live the law is 20 feet from an entrance and that’s just not enough.

                The problem is you can’t change your path from an entrance because you may have to enter and exit. The problem is further that multiple smokers tend to congregate at the mandated distance so the smoke is much worse. It needs to be significantly farther.

                But then it’s worse again in a city area, where the sidewalks are also a bottleneck. I can’t always cross the street to avoid smokers but frequently have to pass right next to them. And I’d like to point out they are the ones inflicting their vice/addiction on others. It should not be my responsibility to get out of the way of their bad habit when their reasonable accommodation would not inflict it on others

                • WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  21 days ago

                  My point is that it is within the realm of normal annoyances from other people and there should be a reasonable expectation of both politeness from the smoker and tolerance from others. A strong perfume, a fart, body odor, spicy food, and many other gasses can be encountered at any point from a similar distance, but nobody suggests punishing people for those.

                  I find the desire to over legislate things due to personal preferences about how other people behave is a bigger and more annoying vice than smoking.

      • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        23 days ago

        I enjoy spreading my ass cheeks and feeling the sun on my anus. It really takes the edge off, ya know what I mean? If I can’t do it in the park or the school playground, where the fuck can I get my sunnies?

        • WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          23 days ago

          School playground might be a bit much, but I unironically support your right to sun your anus in the park. We all have them, we shouldn’t be ashamed.

  • Susurrus@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    23 days ago

    You could say smoking is one of the most human activities ever. Does nothing but actively harm and potentially kill everything around you. Just what we’re the best at.

    But seriously now. Can we speed up smoking bans? Like, everywhere?

  • neon_nova@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    24 days ago

    I live in a country with a strict outdoor smoking ban and I love it.

    There are dedicated smoking areas for people to smoke outdoors, but they are really small and cramped with smokers.

    It’s actually really nice, you never see or smell people smoking unless you wonder too close to the designated smoking areas which are often really out of the way.

    The streets are not really clean here, but at least it’s not cigarette butts. Even things like vapes need to be smoked in a designated area, but sometimes people do it on the street anyway.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      23 days ago

      Nice. I think our only real outdoor restriction is “within 20’ of an entrance”. But it’s not enough.

      That reminds me I need to complain to one of my favorite restaurants. They have an ash tray outside so people are less likely to litter and it is more than 20’ from the entrance. However it’s too close. When the patio is open, the smokers are just across the sidewalk and it ruins the meal

  • JoeKrogan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    24 days ago

    Good i hope more countries adopt this. Türkiye is terrible for this, lovely country and people but there are smokers almost everywhere.

  • PattyP@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    23 days ago

    This comment section is a disaster, just as bad as reddit. Comments of no substance on the side of popular opinion get upvotes, and waves of downvotes come for anyone who disagrees even a little, and even if they do it in a reasonable way.

    I’m mildly asthmatic so I don’t smoke, vape, etc. I have tried a few times and it is simply too much for my lungs to cope with. I still think banning people from smoking in public parks or on beaches is a bit much, and not doing the same with vaping seems like a strange double standard. I had a college roommate who both vaped and smoked, and the vaping bothered me more. I still put up with it.

    Hopefully enforcement is reasonable - respectful smokers who deliberately try to keep their distance should be allowed to enjoy themselves, but I understand prosecuting(?) those who show no care and smoke right next to nonsmokers.

    • null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      23 days ago

      Comments of no substance on the side of popular opinion get upvotes, and waves of downvotes come for anyone who disagrees even a little, and even if they do it in a reasonable way.

      Lemmy seems much worse for this than reddit TBH.

      There’s a number of topics about which any dissent is met with vehement derision. As in those engaging in wrong think are assholes.

      I don’t really know of course but I suspect it’s because lemmy has a narrower demographic than reddit. Opinions are just generally more homogeneous. I guess I’m describing an echo chamber.

    • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      22 days ago

      The issue with smoking is the second hand smoke. It causes cancer, among many other health issues. Vape on the other hand doesn’t really have this same concern.

      They aren’t banning smoking because of nicotine, they are banning it because it causes cancer.

      • PattyP@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        22 days ago

        Yes, secondhand smoke is bad. But we are talking about outdoor environments where it should usually be possible for smokers to keep their distance.

        As for vaping, it hasn’t really been around long enough yet to know for sure what the health risks are regarding the secondhand aerosol exposure, but there is reason to be concerned. It is almost certainly not as bad as secondhand smoke, but there are still risks.

        • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          22 days ago

          While I agree, these laws aren’t being made because smokers keep accidentally smoking near others, it’s because a large number of smokers can’t be assed to keep their distance. The major place I notice smokers is when they are just meandering through a large crowd as if everyone around them is fine with the smoke.

          • PattyP@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            22 days ago

            I get that, but shouldn’t it be possible then to target that kind of behavior specifically rather than all smoking? Rather than banning smoking on x beach or in y park, they could ban smoking within x meters of a minor or non consenting adult. It would be more complicated but also more fair.

            Ultimately I don’t know what all of the problems with that approach would be, but it would make more sense to me.

    • Anonymaus@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      23 days ago

      You just need to find the right community preferably where there are no bots, trolls

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      23 days ago

      There’s one section of benches on my town common that smells like cigarettes from all the way over on the sidewalk. Even if it’s empty. There are so many smokers that the stink won’t go away even though it’s outside. Why do they get to ruin that section of park for everyone else?

      We have this one park with a small beach section. They try to rope off a s,all smoking section away from everyone else, but you can still smell it. Why do they get to ruin the public beach for everyone else?

  • oyo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    24 days ago

    Protests bigger than anti-Trump ones in the US incoming in 3…2…1…

    • pyre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      22 days ago

      all the more reason. what’s the point of banning something if no one’s doing it

  • BetaBlake@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    24 days ago

    Europeans should get a new hobby, smoking is gross and you smell like burnt shit

  • HugeNerd@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    23 days ago

    LOL like here in Montreal I see people smoking right next to the “No smoking within 3 meters” or whatever sign.

  • Artyom@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    23 days ago

    Dang, France is really about to take away the one thing that the USA has always been ahead of them on.

  • Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    23 days ago

    I like these laws but also I want to smoke in some places. I’d love a return of places like cigar lounges and whisky bars

  • ihatefascist@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    23 days ago

    To protect children, meanwhile the soil is filled with cancer-inducing products pumped away illegally by big chemistry plants. In belgium and netherlands we can barely eat our own produce thanks to this. When are we gonna ban them??