• Optional@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    159
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    First off, Signal hasn’t said anything, this is an accusation made at a conference in Kyiv. So - who knows, they’re behind, they don’t have billions to support an army, who knows.

    IF they have chosen to not help Ukraine where at all possible, that would be bad.

    All of that said, if I was running a modern army using an encrypted chat app, I’d fucking have all that shit in-house, wtf. It’s 2025. Ukraine already has a bunch of l337 h4X0rs. I’m sure they could slap something together in days and have it in the field in weeks.

    • pntha@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      59
      ·
      1 month ago

      not to mention the Signal protocol is open source so they could literally build something in days and ensure the same encryption

      • ForgotAboutDre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        1 month ago

        Maintaining and testing such an app has costs and risks. They may think it’s more secure that signal does this. It is also harder to attack all of signal.

        They are also significantly resource constrained, everything they have goes towards defence. The effort building the app could be deployed on developing weapon systems they can’t buy.

        Your right nations should have their own independent systems for secure communications for military, politicians and civil service.

    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 month ago

      I’m sure they could slap something together in days and have it in the field in weeks.

      We make a lot of assumptions about how other people live, and what they have available.

  • PotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    1 month ago

    What exactly is the cooperation that Signal was doing beforehand? Signal claims to collect very little data so I’m not sure how exactly they help?

    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      so I’m not sure how exactly they help?

      I would say yes, that you are not sure how exactly they help, if I’m answering your question as written.

  • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Did it ever respond to those “requests”? What would Signal have anyway other than phone number to login association.

    • oldfart@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      What’s the difference in this context? Can’t their enemies send dodgy links and QR codes on Matrix?

      • 🌶️ - knighthawk@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        they can send anything, but if they run their own matrix on their own servers then the data stays in house… important for govt or military things

  • postall@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    32
    ·
    1 month ago

    Ok, they had choice to use Jami, app independent of anyone, but they chose centralization…

    • cm0002@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      1 month ago

      The article is about Signal providing info on what the Russians are doing on the app and not Ukraine using it themselves

    • aleq@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Did they really? I assume they would do more research than me when choosing tech, but my initial reaction is “the fuck is a Jami?”. Is this a big app in recent years?

      • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        It’s a messenger backed by the GNU foundation. The last time I tried it it didn’t reliably deliver messages on Android.

      • postall@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        1 month ago

        And you’re proud of that? Well, I’m glad someone else has found out about serverless, independent messenger.

        • aleq@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 month ago

          Not sure how you read pride into this at all, the implication is that if they don’t know about it it’s not a choice, while at the same time acknowledging that perhaps I’m just out of the loop.

  • John Richard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    63
    ·
    1 month ago

    Give it time. Before long you’ll see articles about how we need to ban encryption to help Ukraine fight Russia & Democrats will support it cause that is how clueless many of them are.