• Panties@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    146
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    1 day ago

    No earphone jack again. That’s a bit sad. Even though I mainly use BLT earbuds, I still sometimes wish I could use my wired headphones. It’s just a small inconvenience

    • Ulrich@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      21 hours ago

      Not having a headphone jack is just a slap in the face from a company whose whole image is supposed to be longevity and eco-friendly.

    • Laser@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      46
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      1 day ago

      I had a phone without before, that one came with a simple cheap passive adapter for USB-C to 3.5mm headset. You lose out on using headphones while charging, but other than that I was never really inconvenienced…

      • stealth_cookies@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        22 hours ago

        I disagree about this being a good solution. USB-C is not meant to take the strain of being used as an audio port when being used in the go so there is risk of damaging the port while a headphone jack is more stable and allows the plug to rotate. Plus I don’t want to have a dingle I can forget when in a rush.

        • idiomaddict@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          21 hours ago

          They should make cases with the adapter built in, the way they used to (still do?) for external battery packs.

      • Panties@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        It’s really a small inconvenience, but using an adapter would mean I’d be prone to misplace it when I use my headphones on anything else, so it hardly makes anything better

        • Laser@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 day ago

          The reason for not using a headphone jack is making it simpler for the manufacturer, one less connector to handle which also limits how slim a phone can be.

          I’m not saying this is good for the consumer, but there are reasons for integrating the functionality into the USB-C port.

          • Ulrich@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            14 hours ago

            one less connector to handle which also limits how slim a phone can be.

            The headphone jack is 3.5mm. iPhones are ~7.5mm thick, more than double. The smallest phone available on the market is 4.2mm.

          • shaggyb@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            16
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            24 hours ago

            For $700 I’m not interested in compromising my own convenience for theirs.

            • Laser@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              24 hours ago

              Fair, though the fact doesn’t exist in a vacuum.

              If you want easily replaceable parts and a system that can unlock the bootloader for example, your argument can be made for 99% of phones on the market. The more requirements you add, the smaller the scope gets until there are no devices left to choose from.

          • hexonxonx@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            21 hours ago

            These points were all disproved long ago. The jack is a the same thickness as the display.

            The reason is because BT headphones have a much higher margin, and need to be replaced every few years because of the battery (if not already replaced because they were lost or damaged).

            It’s just a dumb cash grab.

          • Ulrich@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            23 hours ago

            It’s not hard to manufacture a headphone jack. We’ve been doing it since the 80s. Probably costs them a penny BOM.

        • hcbxzz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          19 hours ago

          fast charging / USB-PD may not work, and 3.5mm media controls may not pass through properly

    • Mandrilleren@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      22 hours ago

      I never use wired headphones even though I have a jack in my phone. But I have never bought a phone without a jack and probably never will.

      Ipersonally think it’s user hostile to remove the jack and also goes directly agains the green profile Fairphone wants to have.

    • Kowowow@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      23 hours ago

      “Modularity” but still no headphone jack, couldn’t I just have a backplate with a big bump on it to accommodate a 3.5mm jack?

      • foggenbooty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Big? The headphone jack is not large enough to protrude from a cell phone chassis. Any company telling you they can’t fit it is just lying to sell you BT headphones.

            • danc4498@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              14 hours ago

              I’m assuming they are removing the headphone jack cause the internal components take up too much space. I can’t imagine these companies removing the jacks cause they cost too much money.

    • lobut@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      24 hours ago

      I was just hoping a phone like fairphone would give me the option to buy a small module or something to let me do it.

      Yes, yes there’s adapters … yes, yes, you don’t need to use it … I understand. I just want it.

    • danc4498@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Probably not a popular thing to say on here, but I think you’ve lost the battle for the earphone jack. It probably just requires way too much real estate to be practical on a modern day cell phone.