- cross-posted to:
- world@lemmy.world
- cross-posted to:
- world@lemmy.world
Western officials seized on a dubious death toll of 30,000 protesters to escalate against Iran. The number originates with a single, clearly compromised source. But a zealously pro-war Guardian reporter is doing her best to legitimize it.
That quote was attributed by The Guardian to an alleged doctor whose real name the newspaper refused to publish, but whose identity it claimed to have verified.
The author of The Guardian’s article is a former fashion blogger named Deepa Parent, who has become the paper’s go-to source for Iran war propaganda, churning out over a dozen pieces for The Guardian driving the regime change narrative against the Islamic Republic since violent riots engulfed the country on January 8 and 9.
Parent has emerged as the face of The Guardian’s attacks on Iran despite having no apparent ties to the country and not appearing to speak its language. Farsi is not listed among the half-dozen languages in which she claims to be bilingual or speak in some functional professional capacity.
Before adopting the surname Parent around 2019, The Guardian’s go-to Iran reporter wrote under the name Deepa Kalukuri. Her journalistic output was largely limited to fashion reviews in Indian media. A typical piece published in India’s Just For Women magazine in 2016 was headlined: “Samantha Is Setting Some Serious Fashion Goals! Check Them Out!”
Much of Parent’s work at The Guardian’s so-called “Rights and Freedom” section has been funded by an NGO called Humanity United, which was founded by tech billionaire Pierre Omidyar and his wife, Pam.



"5. A defensible reading of the evidence to date
The most credible baseline supported by named, documentable evidence is in the low thousands: multiple NGOs and vetting efforts have confirmed roughly 6,000–7,000 deaths with many more cases under review — a conservative, replicable floor [6] [1]. Simultaneously, independent hospital tallies and leaked internal documents provide a plausible but less verifiable counterfactual that the toll could be an order of magnitude larger — 20,000–36,500 — especially for the intense 8–9 January period; these higher figures cannot yet be treated as equally verified because they depend on sources and methods that remain partially opaque [3] [5] [4]. Rigorous accounting will require wider access to hospital records, unimpeded forensic work, and independent international investigation; until those are possible, the accepted range will remain a contested field between a documented multi‑thousand minimum and plausible claims of tens of thousands [2] [11]."
from:
https://factually.co/fact-checks/politics/2025-2026-iran-protests-death-tallies-methods-credible-estimates-df5957
CIA funded think tanks through the National Endowment Funds program are not “NGO’s”