Summary

Finland has declined a U.S. request to export eggs amid a severe American shortage caused by bird flu.

The Finnish Poultry Association cited the lack of prior trade agreements and complex regulatory hurdles. Even if exports were possible, Finland’s limited egg production would not significantly impact the U.S. crisis.

Other European nations, including Sweden and Denmark, also face difficulties meeting U.S. demand, while Europe grapples with its own egg shortages.

The U.S. has turned to countries like Turkey and the Netherlands for supplies as bird flu remains a global issue.

  • rockettaco37@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    126
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    This is what happens when you burn all your bridges. I’m American myself and to be brutally honest, I hope most of the free world will continue to refuse requests to export to us.

    • melpomenesclevage@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      1 month ago

      yeah, it sucks, I wish we had this cheap protein, but, like… americans need to suffer. they need to suffer, and they need to know it’s their leader’s fault.

      • Jimmyeatsausage@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 month ago

        The suffering is almost a guarantee, but I’m not holding my breath on anyone that doesn’t already do so holding Trump accountable for shit.

        • melpomenesclevage@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 month ago

          unlike the more severe accountable shit like getting people to murder their own children with pox for the cause, the eggs thing is something that allows people to reverse course, and in fact makes it easier. this might genuinely be the largest threat to the regime.

      • Boomer Humor Doomergod@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        They need to know it’s their fault. They elected him, either through action or inaction.

        Then they need to do some introspection to figure out what the fuck is wrong with them.

        But they won’t because America doesn’t do that. 9/11, for example, had nothing to do with anything America had done.

      • Paddzr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 month ago

        Explain to me like I’m 5… Can we not just stop butchering chickens for few days and get them to lay eggs to “catch” up? Or are those chickens too far removed from normal chickens that they no longer lay eggs?

        • houseofleft@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Key thing to bear in mind is that we think of “chicken” as a single animal, but industrial farming has selectively bred chickens into very different camps.

          Meat chickens grow very big very quickly, and are killed for meat long before adulthood. You’d need to pause production a long enough time for them to grow into adulthood, then they would eventually lay eggs, but at a much slower rate than egg chickens, and requiring a lot more food (because of how big they are)

          • melpomenesclevage@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            plus, the eggs they lay would not be egg chickens. they would be eating chickens. and all of them are dying en masse to the flu.

            and chickens lay whether the eggs are fertilized or not. kinda like how humans menstruate, but, like, much bigger, and we eat it even if we don’t think they’re cute.

        • Dojan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          1 month ago

          They’re being killed because of the avian flu pandemic that’s currently going on. Dead poultry generally doesn’t lay eggs.

          You still have legumes available.

    • Montreal_Metro@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      The US is no longer a member of the ‘free world’. Traveling to US now is just as dangerous as travelling to China.

      • Darkmoon_UK@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Now I might be naive or plain wrong, but I tell you completely honestly, that I would always have been more concerned for my safety travelling to the US than China.

        Naturally, one would steer away from discussing politics or behaving in ‘concerning’ ways in China - for example filming government buildings.

        But, I have never felt I’d be in any danger doing average tourist stuff in China. I’ve been there twice, to more rural parts as it happens, and felt safe: People friendly, no edge.

        US on the other hand… I admit I’ve barely visited to transfer flights, but the idea of being let loose in the US is considerably more challenging for me. Knowing that everyone is potentially armed, that trigger happy police are everywhere, there are high racial tensions, drugged up homeless etc.

        This was truly my impression even before Trump was ever a household name.

        Is it surprising to Americans that a Brit would genuinely feel that way around about the two countries? I don’t know. It doesn’t seem controversial to me, but then I read Americans talking about China as though it’s some scary place for them.

    • LeninOnAPrayer@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Sure. But the American empire will not just slowly die. As their people lose their “toys” that distract them they will need someone to blame it on that isn’t the US government.

      This will at some point be other western nations along with their current scapegoat of immigrants and Palestine supporters. The American empire will use its military power long before it just lets it’s empire die. Its playing cards to see which nations it can blame first and which western allies will decide to align with them rather than face their military.

      I agree with all the anti American boycotts. I do. But I don’t think people realize exactly where that is heading on a world stage.

      • Senal@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        23 days ago

        I suspect more people than you think realise this is a potential outcome.

        Assuming it boils over before there is another election (also assuming that’s a thing that happens), military action is 100% a playable card.

        It’s a toddler with a nuclear tantrum button.

        It’s honestly not that much different in type than most nuclear powered nations.

        The difference is “absolute last resort, and only maybe then” vs “they won’t let me annex Greenland and are being mean to me”

        Hyperbolic ofc, but illustrative.

        What are the reasonable good alternatives though?

        • LeninOnAPrayer@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Maybe, I’m mostly just worried that the western world is fueling nationalism with these tariff wars. The “good alternative” is understanding that the tariff’s are not a war between nations but a war on the working class. These tariff’s are paid by the working class. The good alternative is understanding that the working class of each of these countries SHOULD be fighting against the ruling classes of each nation. The ruling classes between nations being in “conflict” is a charade. No one in the ruling class cares of the consequences but only sees them as an opportunity to fuel nationalism and reactionary sentiment.

          So, while I will agree with anti America and anti imperialism. I just think that the “buy European” or “by Canadian” are missing the forest for the trees. The ruling class of Canada or Europe are not fighting a war against America. They are worsening the material conditions of their working class (in response to the Americans doing so) in order to maintain the profits of the ruling class of their nations.

          It is absolutely ignorant to think that Canada or Europe or any other capitalist nation is fighting for the interest of their working class. They are fighting for the interest of their ruling class and will use nationalism to justify the worsening conditions we all face.

          TLDR: This is not a war between nations but a war between class. (I know Marxist cliche but read it if you want more than that.)

          • LeFantome@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 month ago

            In Canada, a somewhat Trump inspired populist right leaning party had 100% of winning the next election.prediction markets had it at 93%.

            since the beginning of Trumps tarring stacks, the center left party had surged in popularity to a degree not even thought possible. If the election was today, they would win.

            Trump is giving people somebody to rally against. And the “us” vs “them” is the the world vs the US.

          • Senal@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 month ago

            A worldwide revolution in which everyone unites against the “ruling class” isn’t a viable alternative in and of itself, that’s like saying “world peace”.

            An example of an alternative would be something which could fill in the blank in this sentence and make sense.

            “Don’t boycott products/companies, that isn’t how you achieve your goal, what you should be doing is <BLANK>”

            This is not a war between nations but a war between class

            The issue i have with this isn’t that it’s a marxist cliche (i’ll take your word on that, I’ve no idea) it’s that it presents a false dichotomy in which a class war and a national war can’t both be occurring at the same time.