• FerretyFever0@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    111
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    12 days ago

    Here’s something I’ve noticed. Whenever someone describes a group, individual, activity, or anything else with more than 2 negative adjectives in a row, they’re probably saying something deeply unstable. This is one of those times.

    • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      11 days ago

      I take offense to this generalization. When I call someone an honorless gormless bitch ass motherfucker I’m relieving stress so when fists start flying I ain’t blinded by my own anger, my instability is only mildly correlated to my verbosity.

      • FerretyFever0@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 days ago

        Let me sit you down when I say this… but if you’re getting into fights even after relieving stress… it either doesn’t work, or you’re behaving in an unstable manner.

        • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 days ago

          Oh no fights are fun. Tis the curse of my kin, seriously damned near every man on the German side of my family treats fights like a fun time waster. Not saying it’s not instability just that my verbosity is perpetual regardless of my mood or actions, well unless I am physically exhausted then I communicate with a handful of words like a caveman.

          Also just cause I’m somewhat calm going into a fight doesn’t mean that the person I hurled insults at is.

  • InfiniteHench@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    96
    ·
    12 days ago

    I like how the language is ‘claims responsibility.’ You know. Like terrorist groups do after an attack

  • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    71
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    11 days ago

    I’m sick of religious sex freaks forcing others to adhere to their puritan fetishes

    We need to ban organized religion

      • MrNobody@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        11 days ago

        Sure, but since orgaanised religions can’t help to force others to live by their standards, they need to get out of the way. I’m fine with people needing a comfort measure, even if its in the form of an invisibile friend. Whatever helps people sleep at night. However, when they try to force their ideals down everybody elses throat thats a big no.

        So, since they can’t ‘live and let live’ they need to go the way of the dodo, fuck off, and leave the rest of society alone.

      • freddydunningkruger@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        11 days ago

        A tolerant society can not tolerate intolerance. One side will attempt to “just live”, but the intolerant side is incapable of “letting live”, and they will not stop until they replace tolerance with their system of hate.

  • Rooty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 days ago

    “Pro life feminist”

    A christian conservative group in drag,nothing to see here.

    • buttnugget@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 days ago

      Yep. They drive all the decent people out of anti porn feminist spaces, like the porn is misogyny subreddit. They need to be stopped.

  • palordrolap@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    12 days ago

    This whole thing smacks of the “anyone who has a sexual proclivity I claim not to share must have all sexual proclivities I claim not to share” logic. i.e. the logic that got gay people flagged as child molesters back in the bad old days. And occasionally still today.

    Such logic might actually be rooted in projection, which is a deeply disturbing thought. Deeply closeted people desperately clinging to heteronormativity and traditional gender roles because they think that if they don’t they they’ll do something abhorrent. Maybe even to someone who can’t consent. Or they already have and they desperately want to hide away from it.

    Yes, for the love of all that’s holy and secular too, ban the games with apparent child sexual abuse. Children can’t consent. Leave everything else the hell alone.

    I don’t even play video games with sexual themes, but I do play ones that contain 18+ violence. I assume those will be next on the chopping block.

  • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    12 days ago

    Are we wagering this absurdity is built on projection?

    cause I’m wagering this absurdity is built on them projecting.

    • Salamanderwizard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      12 days ago

      It always is. These are the type of folks who have that feeling of shame wash over after they bust a nut to something they “despise.”

      That literally all these types of groups are. They want us to feel the same shame, too. I wish folks could just keep their shit to themselves. Have rules for your own home, sure, but eat shit and rot if you think you should be able to tell me how I should live my life.

        • Salamanderwizard@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 days ago

          Totally. I just mean if you don’t want porn or violence in your home more power to ya, but keep your rules to yourself. Let me live and enjoy my life.

  • Zink@programming.dev
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    11 days ago

    OK now I am not one to lob accusations without evidence, but for any of you kind government agents or AIs reading this, let’s say from anywhere within the Five Eyes since we’re talking about Australia:

    We have another fanatical religious conservative organization here that is publicly labeling opposition groups pedos. You know how this has trended in the past. Keep an eye on these people.

    • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 days ago

      We have another fanatical religious conservative organization here that is publicly labeling opposition groups pedos.

      projection. they want a monopoly on skeezing on the kiddos.

      for some reason people will bend themselves into pretzels to give religious people a pass on buggery. here in washington state, we passed a law mandating the reporting of abused children. conservatives and religious types want to keep these children in their abuse.

      https://washingtonstatestandard.com/2025/07/18/judge-blocks-wa-requirement-for-priests-to-report-child-abuse-disclosed-in-confession/

    • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      11 days ago

      Don’t be silly. Government surveillance isn’t for the protection of the people, it’s for the protection of the government.

      Has the NSA ever caught a terrorist with their massively invasive privacy violating programs, spending the money on that instead of making people better to not become terrorists? Ask the NSA, they’ll tell you they haven’t stopped a single one.

      Government surveillance is in service to these people, why else would they care about the privacy and consent of adults in their free time?

  • Fredselfish@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    12 days ago

    Someone should check this groups computer ls and closets because they are projecting and those fuckers should have no impact on what us Americans or any other country wants to buy. This needs to be reversed Asap.

  • FerretyFever0@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 days ago

    Oml, trying to ban Eminem and Snoop Dogg from Australia? Really? Fuck did Eminem actually do in the last 15 years? Snoop, never really listened to him, can’t think of anything he did (in relation to women). They managed to stop Tyler, the Creator from touring in 2015? They’re doing the dumbest shit. Going after sexualization of women isn’t going to help any actual problems. Pathetic.

    • real_squids@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      12 days ago

      Judging from their description (“pro-life feminists”) I bet they’re using objectification as a cover to push their regressive ideals. When it comes to rap there’s a disproportionate amount of hate towards it from these people, could be as simple as that.

      • FerretyFever0@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        12 days ago

        Of course. I’ve listened to quite a bit of Eminem, more than is reasonable. There’s like 5 songs that I’d say were actually that crazy, mostly about his wife, and mostly 20+ years ago. I’d say it’s probably something to do with racism, actually hating rap usually does.

        • QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 days ago

          The amount of times I’ve seen Eminem counted as a black artist isn’t common enough to be depressing, but it’s alarmingly more than 0.

  • chrischryse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    12 days ago

    The same group who complained Detroit Become Human is bad for glorifying child abuse and women abuse. Yet supported Cuties…

  • DaddleDew@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    12 days ago

    The best part is that for the article Valve supplied a picture of Blue Scout standing speechless in front of pornographic pictures of his mom, as the punch line of one of the best “your mom” jokes of all time.

  • Ech@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 days ago

    Anyone have a guess as to why these companies don’t just cut off the country being used to spearhead these attempts? Like, half the popular games are blocked already. And setting this precedent will likely lead to further fuckery in the future. Is Australlia really that profitable that it’s worth the current and future hassle?