• chocrates@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I love that we have democratized makers such that this stuff can be built. I wish it didn’t “have” to be used to kill each other.

  • EightBitBlood@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Can’t wait for the next Luigi to use one of these on an Epstein CEO. Polymarket, please let me make that bet.

    • YellowParenti@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      If you can get the target out in the open, an old school pipe bomb from just gun powder and stuff from the hardware store on a drone is easier. Im sure for $1000 you too can become a patron saint.

      • EightBitBlood@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Well said! I just appreciate the visual of Fox News covering someone named Mario firing a homemade shoulder mounted missile into the executive floor of Twitter HQ. It’s funnier than ever now that it’s actually plausible.

  • slackj_87@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Great… can’t wait for politicians to use this as a way to pass “common sense” legislation banning 3D printers.

    • Samskara@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      You don’t need to ban 3D printers. Restrictions and licensing requirements for making, using, owning rockets and guidance software are enough.

      • chocrates@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        His guidance is just wifi cameras talking to it. Not sure it even is using gps.

        To ban stuff like this you have to ban a lot of useful tech

      • Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        This already would fall under an FFL license for legal citizens anyway. As is the nature of the internet though, this open design will be preserved and available for those who seek it.

        • Samskara@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Yes. I am actually surprised we haven’t seen a major terrorist attack in a western country using remote controlled or autonomous drones for example. The technology has been available for years now.

          3D printed home made guns like the FGC-9 and Urutau have been around for a while now, but remain marginal in gun crime.

          As you say, the cat is out the bag and on the internet forever. However homemade guns and instructions on how to make them have been around for decades.

          • socsa@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            The lack of simple attacks on soft targets is proof that the threat is overstated and that a statistically overwhelming portion of humans simply don’t want to put bombs on busses and rig them to explode on bridges or in tunnels.

          • [object Object]@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Most western terrorist attacks are by opportunistic losers who don’t have the knowledge or motivation to do something like this.

            They’d rather drive a car into people who make them angry and use a gun they already own.

            As for organized groups until recently there have been any good reason for an attack from any centrally organized group.

          • eleitl@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Ukraine and Russia are western countries. Narco cartels have started using fpv drones, too.

    • village604@adultswim.fan
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      They can try, but the parts that make up a printer are used in tons of other applications. It isn’t hard to build one from scratch.

    • Janx@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Aren’t they already doing that due to their hysteria over “ghost” guns?

    • Dettweiler@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      They’re already trying that in New York and California, unfortunately. “Any 3D printer capable of printing parts for firearms” was the verbage, from what I recall.

    • Retro_unlimited@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I wonder if there is some archive or torrent for STL files, like an archive of thingiverse or something. Would be nice to archive that just in case.

    • teyrnon@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      They already are over 3d guns, this will send them ballistic. They want every printer to keep a record of everything they’ve printed. Model legislation, I think CA tried and so far failed to pass it.

    • aquovie@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      3D printers are even less useful here though. The rocket bit can be replaced with a cardboard tube and some balsa fins. The important parts are the active control and circuitry.

      But I guess logic doesn’t really enter into the conversation anyway.

    • Avicenna@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      No you see, if arms companies own all the rights regarding distribution of 3D printer tech then it is a constitutional right to produce guns with printers, if not then it is terrorism.

  • kerrigan778@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    If I’m understanding this correctly, this is more valuable to underfunded military forces but not for the 3d printed ghost gun types. This doesn’t include propellent or explosives, which are the controlled parts. That’s awesome though.

  • circuscritic@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    That’s fucking nuts.

    I have a lot of thoughts, but all I can really say is that’s fucking nuts.