On the one hand urology and ED are important specialisms, and it’s annoying seeing them mocked. He also actually has experience in public health which makes him more qualified than most trump appointees.

On the other hand, outside of that his record is, for want of a better term, “yikes”.

God forbid men have hobbies

I’m not entirely sure what this does? It automatically creates a copy of a post to lemmy when you post on reddit?

I wonder if a plugin that does the opposite would be helpful? Something that automatically creates a link post on the relevant reddit community when you post on lemmy.

The fact that it includes wikileaks tells me everything I need to know.

People were mad at Lemmy having a hard coded blocklist before, fortunately the dev sensibly removed it. This is worse than the one Lemmy had.

Studies have shown that on the internet pseudonymous interactions are generally more civil than ones using real names.

Something that anyone who’s ever read a Facebook comments section will understand.

That’s the best part (for them) they won’t

I can understand twitter, it’s years of inertia, but threads was the next big thing for all of a week.

The usual trick is to post an image along with “link in the comments”.

People actually use threads?

I assumed everyone had moved on to mastodon/bluesky or crawled back to xitter.

With all the fuckups recently, a random lemming getting added to a white house war crime chat wouldn’t even surprise me at this point.

To be fair, declaring war on the pope is a time honoured Christian tradition.

What do you mean there’s no quick load on this game?

How fucking hard is it to put a $2 ultrasonic distance sensor on the front. I built robots when I was a kid that wouldn’t do this.

This has been solved for 50 years FFS. Yet here we are with techbros thinking cameras can solve everything.

I’m not sure of the correct term. It should be obvious though that if anyone can copyright claim their own image, it would basically make taking photos in many public places impossible.

Defamation and/or tortious interference possibly?

Not necessarily. The standard of proof is different. Just because you couldn’t prove to the civil standard (on the balance of probabilities) that they infringed your copyright, it doesn’t mean the claim was false to a criminal standard (beyond reasonable doubt).

I’d settle for the government prosecuting every false copyright claim as perjury.

Lets not throw out freedom of panorama because of AI.

This was in the UK.