Critics argue that the operation was disproportionate and showed a lack of sensitivity to the symbolic significance of the location.

More like clear intimidation tactic and abuse of the violence monopoly, but okay lets call it “insensitive” i guess.

Authorities cited alleged administrative violations, including unauthorised camping and environmental concerns, as the reason for the intervention.

Ah, yes, so they sent two police officers on regular duty, right? Right?

The scale of the response, however, was widely seen as excessive for such a context: over 30 police officers, some heavily armed, along with helicopters, drones and dog units, carried out identity checks and searched the premises. Several individuals were temporarily detained, and one person sustained minor injuries during the confrontation.

What the…