• GEEXiES@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    1 month ago

    Message aside, the site is cool, love that you can change the style, and the icon animation on the last one is brilliant. Also: a webring! It’s been a long time since I saw one. I need more of this web and I’m happy to rediscover it.

  • AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    1 month ago

    Something I love about this piece is that it being written by a person who cares deeply about stuff means that I now have a positive opinion towards the two places linked as being good places for recipes ([https://www.theguardian.com/profile/meera-sodha](http://www.meera.com/ Sodha) and Smitten Kitchen). I’m going to promptly forget about them, because I’m not the kind of cook who uses recipes, but still, it’s striking to me how transferable caring about stuff is. I don’t know the author of this blog, but based on this post (and the zippity-fast speed that their website loads), I’m positively inclined towards them, because I am a silly human, and that means I am a deeply social creature.

  • cecilkorik@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    I read these websites because I’m also a human and I enjoy experiencing the ideas of my fellow humans first-hand, not filtered into a boring puree or boiled down essence. I have always enjoyed reading things written by actual humans, because I can connect intellectually and emotionally with the actual real live person behind the ideas, and learn and grow with them as they also do the same, and I expect that enjoyment will continue if not intensify in the coming years as AI buries such signals in ugly soulless noise.

    There will always be an appetite for real human creation. The hard part will be reliably finding it. I will be relying heavily on my finely tuned bullshit detector to work as an AI detector for now, and I can only hope that it will be enough.

  • fluxion@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 month ago

    This reminds me of when the Internet was new, exciting, and full of promise for improving life for people and being a reliable way to bypass censorship and share the truth with the world.

    Thank you for that.

  • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 month ago

    As someone who’s been on the web since the 90s I hate this.

    The web was designed to be user agent agnostic. Desktop, phone, fridge, ai agents, curl, python script - whatever agent you are using shouldn’t matter for access. That’s the whole point of open internet, period.

      • kescusay@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 month ago

        At my company, we had to implement all sorts of WAF rules precisely for that reason. Those things are fucking aggressive.

        • brvslvrnst@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 month ago

          Same. And just because page size is “low” doesn’t mean shit when they’re flooding requests. Try having public research data and watch how much your costs go up just due to load balancer throughput.

    • JustARaccoon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 month ago

      They did have a lot of concerns with abuse though and you can see that in the way the cookies debate went before they were supported in their current form. I think AI crawlers tanking bandwidths for websites and misusing the data they scrape would 100% be something the Mozilla from back then would’ve had concerns over allowing or encouraging.

      • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 month ago

        You’re conflating two different issues. The topic is “for whom the web is for?” not banwidth distribution and optimization.

        If LLM bot is being abusive then that’s no different from any other user agent behaving like this and we should expand these protections from intentional/unintentional ddos irrelevant of user agent.

    • xeroxguts@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Lol this is such a bizarre comment. Back then, AI wasn’t scraping everything humans made for the profit of a few. It was a non-issue, and therefore you have no standing in claiming that “that was the whole point.”

      This works as well on my phone as it does on my computer, and loads faster than most modern websites making it that much more accessible to MORE humans.

      The web designer isn’t limiting access, they are expanding on it - for humans. The people actually sentient and able to understand their words rather than just copy and recontextualize them.

  • 𝔻𝔼𝕍𝕀𝕃𝕀𝕊ℍ@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    weird robots sounds “aargh…must…ignore…the rule.” sound of crashed robot “continue scrapping websites.” robot weird noise begin to continues “ignore robot.txt, ignore anti_ai_rules.txt, bypass cloudflare” robot sound getting weird and weirder as it getting deeper and deeper into website

  • karpintero@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    I share the author’s sentiments. Would rather people read my posts and form their own opinions, than offload their thinking to a machine (while consuming energy and water to do so). And the idea that my posts would be scraped and used to train an LLM against my wishes makes me a lot less motivated to publish personal blogs.

  • setVeryLoud(true);@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    30 days ago

    What does 11ty stand for, besides “eleventy”? I’m expecting something like a11y, where there are 11 characters in between.

    Also, someone crash course me about the difference between 11ty and regular SSR?

  • Obinice@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    18
    ·
    1 month ago

    Wow, 8 whole paragraphs? Don’t worry guys ChatGPT’s got ur back 🔥😎🔥

    The author criticises AI search tools like Google’s for repackaging human-created content—such as recipes—into bland, soulless summaries, depriving original creators of credit, personality, and traffic. They highlight “Google Zero,” a feared future when AI answers replace visits to real websites, threatening independent writers and the ecosystems built around them.

    They stress that their website exists for human readers, not machines. Each article is crafted with care, personality, and lived experience, intended to spark thought, connection, and conversation—not to be scraped, flattened, or mimicked by corporate AI models.

    • Whelks_chance@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      Still too long, gimme the broad strokes here. I’m far too busy to interact with art, just gimme the facts.

      • Obinice@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Okay I drained another lake but I think this time I’ve got what you need;

        • AI search recycles work into bland results.
        • “Google Zero” may kill site traffic.
        • Values human trust and personality.
        • Humanity will be consumed all hail AI.
        • Site is for people, not AI.