Most people’s world view can’t see past what they are familiar with. LLMs do a bad job at the things they are tasked with - so make them supervise and coordinate it? Unless it’s in supervision and coordination tools, where it is bad once again?
Other than “haha, let them get replaced by LLMs”, this post does not logically get very far. Marketing and CEOs who spend all of their time turning social networks into their own echo chambers, though, do replace those. No change there, just savings.
That’s obvious to everyone except OP, who wants to start one ring above workers somehow
Most people’s world view can’t see past what they are familiar with. LLMs do a bad job at the things they are tasked with - so make them supervise and coordinate it? Unless it’s in supervision and coordination tools, where it is bad once again?
Other than “haha, let them get replaced by LLMs”, this post does not logically get very far. Marketing and CEOs who spend all of their time turning social networks into their own echo chambers, though, do replace those. No change there, just savings.
Zero idea what any of that means…
My point was “managers” aren’t “the top” they’re literally one level above the bottom
And anything they’re tell the bottom ring to do, is because that’s what they were told to say.
I seem to have overestimated people’s work experience or critical thinking tho, loads of people seem to think of front line managers as “the boss”.