Some years ago, I hosted my own matrix server for a few months. I’m an experienced self-hoster, but I remeber that Matrix was paticularly hard to host, requiring weird proxy rules, DNS adjustments, federation never worked reliably and push notifications never worked at all. I ditched the project soon because I also had no real use for it. However, I recently had some ideas where a Matrix server would be useful again. Has anyone attempted to install it recently and can tell me whether the situation has improved? Also, which server do you recommend? There still is synapse but I found it paticularly complicated to host. Dendrite is now archived and the current fork seems to be tuwunel which doesn’t seem to be under very active development.

  • underline960@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    Damn. That sucks. (Edit: Referring to the comments saying Matrix is dead and dying.)

    I get that IRC and XMPP are more stable and built around federation from the ground up, but… they’re not Discord replacements.

    That was IMHO, the point of Matrix/Element.

    Tell me if I’m wrong, but a significant part of a network’s resilience is the number of nodes and users.

    Without a glowup or some kind of repackaging, IRC/XMPP are doomed to stay niche.

    • curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 days ago

      Xmpp supports group chat, 1:1 messaging, you’ve got webtrc support for voice/video, and its extensible.

      Jingle even has screen sharing (and I think a WIP remote control function).

      What is missing from xmpp?

      • underline960@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        6 days ago

        Technically, nothing.

        In practice, who do you know that’s using it and doesn’t run Arch, by the way?


        My point isn’t that IRC/XMPP aren’t technically capable.

        It’s that they’re not designed for non-technical users.

        I want corporate social media to die. Mastodon and Piefed are far from killing the beast, but they’ve made the more progress than most projects have seen in a long time.

        I want corporate messaging to die. Matrix is far from killing the beast, but for a little while, at least it was trying.

        • curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 days ago

          In practice, who do you know that’s using it and doesn’t run Arch, by the way?

          Well I mostly run Debian, but I do have arch on a machine so maybe I don’t count.

          It’s that they’re not designed for non-technical users.

          Have to agree there, it takes some effort if you’re setting it up for friends and family.

        • poVoq@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          Quicksy and Prav apps allow you to easily signup via SMS verification like WhatApp etc. Super easy and the app works like Whatsapp, completely usable for non technical users (much more so than any Matrix client).

          And Snikket is an super easy all in one solution for running a XMPP based small group server with invite based onboarding. Also completely non-technical user compatible.

    • pedz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      I had the same experience as OP when I tried Matrix a few years ago. No hate on it but it was not easy and I gave up because I already had a simple IRC setup that’s working for me and my friends.

      Some IRC clients are now web based and it’s been enough to keep a few of my friends there instead of Discord. We use The Lounge. It can keep a history, display images, videos, play mp3s, and show previews of most URLs. Like, we can simply copy/paste images into a channel and they are uploaded on the server and displayed in the chat. There’s also push notifications and it’s mobile friendly.

      Convos also does something like this. Apparently it can also do video chat but I’ve never got it to work.

      I’ve recently been thinking about giving Matrix another try but I’m pretty sure my friends are going to stay on “modern” IRC anyway.

    • Atherel@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      Well Discord started as a replacement for IRC and TeamSpeak/Mumble, then began to add more and more things and got used as a forum replacement and everything went down the hill. Why not going back to the roots? We had fucking IRC scripts for matchmaking in Q3CTF.

      • underline960@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 days ago

        I wouldn’t mind going back to IRC roots if it could be made more user friendly and integrate voice and video chat.

        Good UX/UI goes a long way to make it so non-technical people can join and strengthen the network.

  • cactus@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    6 days ago

    damn, was not expecting to see so much hate towards matrix.
    it sure was annoying to set up, but once I got it up the way I wanted, it kind of just worked from that moment on. I’ve had it for some 5 months now and it works as intended with no issues, aside from some small glitches here and there which get fixed very fast (on the mobile app).
    my use case was getting off Discord with a bunch of friends, so we needed a reliable way to have multiple chats, channels/rooms and good voice chat with screen sharing. element call does those well. my federation is of course also closed. for me e2ee is just a bonus
    I think that if that’s your use case, it’s good for that. synapse does seem a bit inefficient but I guess you can’t do much about it

    • superglue@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      My experience is the same as yours, but I think the people complaining are the ones who are federated and are in large communities. Matrix apparently doesnt handle large rooms very well.

      • cactus@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        fair enough, that’s true. it was one of the reasons I turned off federation, even on a beefy server synapse still lagged and timed out when I would join medium sized rooms.

  • cecilkorik@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 days ago

    IRC and XMPP are infinitely less painful, honestly, and both were designed around federation from the ground up, long before it was cool.

  • PetteriPano@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    6 days ago

    I set it up during the outage last week.

    Easy enough to just pull in the synapse docker container and run it on my home server. I wireguard it to my VPS that acts as a reverse proxy.

    Both federation and push notifications work.

    • qtip@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 days ago

      I switched from IRC to matrix in 2018 specifically because I found mobile difficult.

      I used the suggestion in your linked document by running irssi in a tmux session on a VPS I paid for, then using a bridge to an app on my phone. I found the experience to be cumbersome even for someone like myself (and even then irssi required reboots or else it would lose performance over time).

      I wanted to use IRC for a family chat, but I couldn’t possibly convince my friends and family to go through the same client setup as I did.

      In my opinion there are use cases that either IRC or Matrix would be preferred over the other (not to mention other self hosted communication software).

  • vga@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    Matrix seems to work well. I’m on a smallish non-profit server. I regard it as the premium open-source step forward from IRC.

    The worst problem is that there are really no channels that I care to follow.

  • jevans ⁂@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    6 days ago

    It’s been a solid tool for hosting just for myself to bridge all the different platforms/protocols that people want to talk to me using, but there is no way I would recommend it to anyone else. I don’t know if it will ever get to a point where it works well enough for me to recommend. If you do want to host a server though, I strongly recommend matrix docker ansible deploy to do so.

    • pedroapero@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      Agree, AFAIC it’s only good at bridging protocols. Most likely an ecosystem advantage more than a protocol one.

  • verstra@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    6 days ago

    My matrix server is nearing 5 years old. I have federation disabled, because I don’t need that - we are using it as a family chat. sqlite database I’m using is now 2GB, but other than that it is working great.

    I do acknowledge that I’m not leveraging the things matrix is designed for (federation, e2e encryption), but to be honest, it’s not really good at that.

  • Lucy :3@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    6 days ago

    Tbh I had no issues with synapse.

    The problems that persist: Very rare issues with decrypting (as I rarely encounter it, while being in encrypted chats with 150+ users, it’s not an issue for me), apart from after you changed clients, slow image loading (a bit annoying, but ok if you multitask anyway) and clients all having different feature sets (some of which you can also hackily make work in others).

  • Señor Mono@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    6 days ago

    I installed synapse some weeks ago. Pretty easy, straightforward. Even managed to install some bridges.

    After the last matrix.org incident and some info about the failing message retention, I just killed the server again. I’m not comfy with the service being so greedy/resource hungry and also the usability sucks at certain points.

  • tvcvt@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    I have synapse server running in docker on a VPS and it’s been pretty reliable. At my office I use it as sort of a self-hosted Slack replacement. For our use case, I don’t have federation enabled, so no experience on that front. It’s a small office and everyone here uses either Element or FuzzyChat on desktop and mobile. It runs behind an nginx reverse proxy and I’ve got SSO set up with Authentik and that’s worked very well. Happy to share some configs if that would be useful.

  • blurry@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 days ago

    I host synapse as docker container behind traefik and it works pretty well. I have two users on my instance, have setup the mautrix-whatsapp bridge and federate with the instance of a friend.

    The setup was straight forward: Pointing the sub-domain via traefik to the service and in the homeserver.yml enable well-known which announce port https with port 443 instead of 8448.

  • Samsy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 days ago

    I use conduit. And really happy with it. Since I use 3 bridges the compose.yml is a mess. It works really nice. The sliding feature boosts all media files. But there is always something broken or misconfigured. Actually my WhatsApp bridge blocks all mediafiles and I was too busy to fix it already.