• InEnduringGrowStrong@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 day ago

      let’s not pretend you’re not gonna bang a hot young girl

      You probably can’t imagine someone that doesn’t have the same desires you have, but I wouldn’t have sex with a 25 year old kid let alone a 17 y.o. one. Both look like kids to me and present no attraction whatsoever.

      • Galactose@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        18
        ·
        1 day ago

        You wouldn’t have sex with a 25 year old because, you’re an incel or an asexual & the “Both look like kids to me” part of your statement is concerning. BTW, I’m into MILFs

        • buttnugget@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          23 hours ago

          Maybe you’re not old enough to understand, but once you get older, people start to look very young. That’s why some of us think it’s so gross.

          • Galactose@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            13 hours ago

            Yeah & as long as they’re consenting adults/above age of consent, I have no business calling them pedos. You missed that part, Mr/Ms False-Accuser

    • BussyGyatt@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      looks like I hit the nail on his character

      if thats really what you think this looks like then your discernment is… unreliable

          • Galactose@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            13 hours ago

            Projecting are we (along woth another non-answer), unlike you I’m not a cretin that goes around twisting laws. But hey keep projecting, it’s going to be fun when you’re on the recieving end if such corruptive attitude.

            I get to sleep soundly knowing that I am morally bankrupt.

    • ArkanianOffshoot@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Wow, lots to unpack here.

      1. You can argue about definitions all day if you want, at the end of the day, if your daughter somehow “dated” a 39-year-old, I’m hoping you’d want the guy arrested. The vast majority of people would call it pedophilia, and calling it “tasteless” is a hell of an understatement.

      2. “let’s not pretend you’re not gonna bang a hot young girl”. Hell no. Speak for yourself mate. I’m 26 and I would NEVER date an 18-year-old, let alone “date” a 17-year-old when I’m 39.

      3. “you’re nowhere to be found when the genders are reversed”. Who are you talking to? Whether a man or a woman has sex with a minor, it’s still statutory rape. I know there are some so-called “press outlets” that word things differently when it’s a woman having sex with a minor, where they use terms like “had sex” instead of “raped”. I think it’s appalling. I’m not part of the crowd you think you’re addressing.

      4. “It hasn’t been 5 seconds & the guy responded with his butthurt, looks like I hit the nail on his character” Again, who are you talking to? My first comment is the one where I called Seinfeld a pedo, and this is the second one. I posted my initial comment 6 hours ago and came back 6 hours later to see that I had apparently caused a shitstorm.

      I sure wasn’t expecting to see a brigade of strange individuals arguing about the definition of pedophilia. Are you usually this enthusiastic about semantics?

      • Galactose@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Yes when it comes to laws & due-process. Will you be this enthusiastic when you get a taste of your own amoral-medicine ??

        BTW, people are considering calling old men who date 25 y/o women as pedos. So good luck when the goal shifts again. Looks like your “unpacking” skills needs work

        • ArkanianOffshoot@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          24 hours ago

          First you talk about laws and due process, then you talk about morals. Which is it? I’m not sure which part of what I’ve said is either illegal or immoral/amoral.

          Dating a minor is bad, whether legally or morally. Some countries enforce this with no exceptions, while some allow exceptions for people who are close to the same age, like a 17yo dating a 19yo. Feel free to prove me wrong, but I don’t think there are any countries in the West where an actual fully-grown adult is allowed to “date” a minor.

          On an individual level, morals are technically malleable and arbitrary, but the law doesn’t (and shouldn’t) give two shits about that. If you think dating minors is perfectly fine, explain that to the judge.

          And if you still want to argue about semantics, then sure, maybe in some countries, there’s an age-based difference in legal terminology between “an illegal relationship with a minor” and “pedophilia”, but outside of the legal realm, they’re one and the same. I have no respect for pedos (crazy, right?) and certainly won’t defend them, whether they diddle 9, 12 or 17yo kids.

          “people are considering calling old men who date 25 y/o women as pedos” Yeah, and “people” are saying Hillary Clinton is a lizard. “People” say Paul McCartney was replaced by a clone. “People” say all kinds of shit. “People” is no one and everyone at the same time. You can make “people” say anything.

          At the end of the day, a 25-year-old is an adult, and therefore cannot be a victim of pedophilia. Therefore, old men who date 25-year-olds are supercreeps, but not pedos. I’m not defending them, I’m only saying that you can’t put an old guy in jail for dating a 25-year-old, simply because no matter how reprehensible you think their relationship is, they’re both adults in the eyes of the law. The guy is still a creep though.

          What is there to argue about? Who are you defending exactly? And what makes my reasoning so “amoral”?

          “when you get a taste of your own amoral-medicine” “when the goal shifts again” I’m pretty sure my aversion to dating immorally young people will protect me from any slippery slopes and moving goalposts in the future.

    • IronBird@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      23 hours ago

      17 is old enough to decide you want to fuck somebody, for sure. hell, the age of consent across most of europe is 16 iirc…

      there’s a world of difference between drugging a/o raping woman/children, eastein and our pedo in chief, and choosing to fuck some guy for his $

      (jerry still a piece of self-centered, self-serving piece of shit to be clear…i’m just still in the camp that words have meaning)

      • Galactose@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Would you look at that, the mods deleted my comments, because they had no way of countering logic.

        Inciting dangerous acts of false allegations & calling it moral is not a can of worms you lot wanna open.