favoredponcho@lemmy.zip to Not The Onion@lemmy.worldEnglish · 6 months agoDave Chappelle Says ‘I Resent the Republican Party’ Because They ‘Weaponized’ Transgender Jokes: ‘That’s Not What I Was Doing’variety.comexternal-linkmessage-square198linkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10file-textcross-posted to: entertainment@lemmy.world
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkDave Chappelle Says ‘I Resent the Republican Party’ Because They ‘Weaponized’ Transgender Jokes: ‘That’s Not What I Was Doing’variety.comfavoredponcho@lemmy.zip to Not The Onion@lemmy.worldEnglish · 6 months agomessage-square198linkfedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: entertainment@lemmy.world
minus-squareNostraDavid@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·6 months agoIf punk was “extremely LGBTQ+ acceptant”, then they did they have to create an offshoot? 🤔
minus-squarehomes@piefed.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·6 months agoI don’t think you understand punk There’s no “have to” about it
minus-squareNostraDavid@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·6 months agoI don’t, which is why I posted the question.
minus-squareOyml77@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·6 months agoIf television viewers were accepting of cooking then why did they have to create a subgenre of cooking shows?
minus-squareNostraDavid@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·6 months agoThat… doesn’t make sense. Viewers don’t make new shows.
minus-squareOyml77@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·6 months agoOk. Your question also didn’t make sense.
minus-squareNostraDavid@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·6 months agoPunk is genre P LGBTQ+ are viewers V Queercore is subgenre Q I said: P accepts V V creates Q If P accepts/includes V why V create separate Q? TV viewers are V Cooking show is P Cooking show subgenre is Q You said: V accepts P then why did V create Q How should your response make sense to what I’ve said, logically speaking?
minus-squarehomes@piefed.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·6 months agoStop it with your relentless “logic”!
minus-squareOyml77@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·6 months agoHahaha. It was a stretch to be sure. The point is one doesn’t need to be exclusive of the other.
minus-squarehomes@piefed.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·6 months agoShame on you for not recognizing a famous line from Futurama! 😛
minus-squareOyml77@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·6 months agoMan, I’m old and too uncool for Lemmy.
minus-squarehomes@piefed.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·6 months agosorry, I guess I’m also too old to make a good joke ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
If punk was “extremely LGBTQ+ acceptant”, then they did they have to create an offshoot? 🤔
I don’t think you understand punk
There’s no “have to” about it
I don’t, which is why I posted the question.
If television viewers were accepting of cooking then why did they have to create a subgenre of cooking shows?
That… doesn’t make sense. Viewers don’t make new shows.
Ok. Your question also didn’t make sense.
Punk is genre P LGBTQ+ are viewers V Queercore is subgenre Q
I said:
P accepts V V creates Q If P accepts/includes V why V create separate Q?
TV viewers are V Cooking show is P Cooking show subgenre is Q
You said:
V accepts P then why did V create Q
How should your response make sense to what I’ve said, logically speaking?
Stop it with your relentless “logic”!
Hahaha. It was a stretch to be sure. The point is one doesn’t need to be exclusive of the other.
Shame on you for not recognizing a famous line from Futurama! 😛
Man, I’m old and too uncool for Lemmy.
sorry, I guess I’m also too old to make a good joke ¯\_(ツ)_/¯