• saarth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    80
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    13 days ago

    This stinks of (rotten) meat lobby.

    I hope the meat substitute industry comes up with some kind of ‘it’s not meat’ marketing campaign to counter this.

    • Eril@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 days ago

      It worked for oat milk. I’m buying “no milk” all the time 😅

    • hubobes@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 days ago

      A company here just calls everything Salmo’n, Chicke’n and so on, technically it isn’t the actual word.

      • RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        12 days ago

        That seems pretty scummy and misleading. I’m not a fan of the restrictive naming Iike in the article, but the name shouldn’t try to mislead either.

        A burger is more about the form, same even for sausage, steak is more gray area, something like “veggie minced meat” or stuff with “meat” in the name is a no-no imo

        • hubobes@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          12 days ago

          Okay, I like it as I am looking for replacements for salmon or chicken. So if they start calling their burger burge’r to circument such rules I wouldn’t mind.

          • RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            12 days ago

            I get how similar naming can be useful in knowing what sort of product you’re getting and what it can be used to replace, but I dislike more how it is purposefully misleading. Shouldn’t be allowed to call it that close to salmon without it containing any salmon. Same for other similar ingredient names where there’s a chance of confusion.

            A meat product being quirky and inverting the m so it is marketed as w’eat would just be… No.