

Uh, can we do this experiment on someone else’s balls? Asking for a friend.


Uh, can we do this experiment on someone else’s balls? Asking for a friend.


I would bet you have to choose the date range and cause of death, and “murdered” is never one of those choices.


Don’t forget the amusement park right next to the waste disposal facility.


You don’t seem to understand that both of those things are essentially the same.
No, they’re not… one is law about how you make your product, the other is law about not harming your competitors. While they may share a name, “regulation”, it’s night and day difference. You seem to be looking at a chocolate cake and a cinnamon roll and then are saying “They’re both deserts, they’re essentially the same thing”.
Do you not see the very obvious mechanism that regulations have in making sure competition is sustainable by keeping market costs fair and safe above exploitative practices?
It sounds like you’re trying to describe price floors or something, but doing it in a confusing way that attempts to lead to some kind of gotcha? But I’ve already said I’m okay with regulation against anti-competitive practices, so I don’t really know where you’re going.


Ya think librals don’t have a carbon copy version of what you’re discussing? Replace a trailor park with a low income housing project and boom, you’re the pot calling the kettle black.
This isn’t a statement made by a sad person, this is just a fact.
Why are you so willing to take the word of OP as a fact? You don’t believe a single word is even slightly misleading, or chosen specifically to bend the truth and garnish support? OP described his entire life in 15 seconds in one paragraph and you’re like “Yea that true”.
Which congress person were referencing is irrelevant to the initial point.


Thank you for you anecdotal experience. It provides much… Much… More support for OPs… anecdotal experience.
Here’s to hoping that no conservatives post their anecdotal experience that’s exactly opposite of what y’all are reporting because then, who knows what you’ll believe, rite?
Sure… If you exclude her husband, but theres only one reason you would do that…


In a free market competition drives the creation of better and more profitable products.
Yeah… And then through competition they’re all driven down to a price that’s near production
It’s only without regulations can the formation of monopolies and oligopolies even happen
You don’t seem to understand the difference between laws that prevent the creation of anti-competitive practice and regulation that increases the cost of product and decreases competitiveness.
The first is good. The other two are what’s resulting in your “late stage capitalism”.


No, I thought it was a funny statement by a sad person.


I’m going to write a short, vague, anecdotal post summarizing my entire childhood and absolutely rake in the upvotes by inserting a charged key word so that everyone on a left leaning platform will agree with me.


The entire concept of capitalism rests on selling something for more than it’s worth
To an extent yes, but mostly no.
In a free market prices are naturally driven down to the cost of production, to where you’re barely able to keep the doors open. The only way capitalism reaches the state that you’re describing is with government regulation and overreach.
The money isn’t that great, that by itself doesn’t explain anything; your chances of being the next Nancy Polosy is about 0%.
I’d like to think that if I was in their situation that I wouldn’t be in that 70%.
If I was in a situation where I could screw everyone behind me, but make the county better in the process I’d do it in a heartbeat.
Oof, so you think that greater than 70% of the people in congress care more about their take home pay than the success of the country they represent?


You had a shower thought of an internet meme that has been around for like 20 years?
It’s hilarious that even with all of that going on, there’s still not a single issue that the two parties can agree on and implement.
Term limits? Profiting from your position/insider trading?
Both popular issues with both parties, but absolutely zero attempt from either side to implement them.


Good job, now you’re ready to post some unhinged shit on LinkdenIn


Most everything is, I mean it shouldn’t be, but it is.
Oh, vigilantism against targets that weren’t even “verified” until recently.
However wrong I think your idea is; shooting up anything other than kids would be great.