I am the peak of human evolution, and you are just a capybarnia.

  • 0 Posts
  • 19 Comments
Joined 3 months ago
cake
Cake day: February 24th, 2026

help-circle

  • Obviously, but we can’t have a unified army or defence force without it. Countries close to a conflict will want to use the army to defend their people, while those further away will try to prevent their people from being involved.

    Neither is wrong, because we are not a federation and our individual countries are still more important than the union as a whole.


  • We can’t afford to start a real war with them because they control far too much of our technology. Yes, we could threaten to block their access to our markets but what if they don’t change their behaviour? Do we go through with it? Some of their services are critical to our daily lives and just one day without a few of them and entire systems would collapse.

    EDIT: Big tech corporations like Google are more powerful than governments. While they are not invulnerable to sanctions, we may lose as much or more than they do if we take drastic action without viable alternatives.




  • Sorry, I was too vague with my comment. The truth is that I don’t know what the right way is, but as the article says, Germany still needs the US to agree to let them buy the missiles. Any time I see a European diplomat visiting the White House to negotiate with the US, I think “What are we giving up next?” because I don’t really trust them to keep their word on any deal.

    Once again, I really do understand that Germany needs to improve its defences, but I don’t think this will go down as their government thinks it will.


  • Let’s hope so. Creating a better, more united Europe would be truly amazing. The whole “Country A vs Country B” mentality within our union is stupid and only makes us weaker.

    This approach works in times of peace and prosperity, but when a crisis emerges, we drown in pointless discussions instead of addressing the issue.


  • Yes, it’s impossible to get every country to agree on something like this. We can’t even agree on simple topics, and even if we did, there’d be nothing to stop future governments from acting differently.

    The whole concept of the EU needs to be reworked so that it has a central government with greater authority over its member countries.



  • While I would love to see an EU army, I don’t think it’s realistic. Unfortunately most countries are too culturally and ideologically different, and this would never work in the long term. What would happen if an anti-EU party took control of a member country? What if one country objects to the European army being used in a specific operation?

    We’ve seen countless times when an EU member has sabotaged the entire union or made specific things more difficult because, in their opinion, it would go against their country’s interests.

    We are not the United States of Europe. Many older people do not share a sense of European pride, and sometimes even hate their neighbouring countries.