

If they were posting CP it wouldn’t be Turkey calling for a banning, it would be forwarded quietly by the company to local law enforcement.
If they were posting CP it wouldn’t be Turkey calling for a banning, it would be forwarded quietly by the company to local law enforcement.
I’m pretty sure the immediate goal is to make it so that real content and AI content have the same legal status. Their ultimate end game is likely to create new, more draconian IP law that will let them own the AI content. Possibly even give preference to AI created content.
DeSantis was supposed to be the next Trump. He’s way too butthurt to help out like that.
It felt like a kidnapping because it was factually a kidnapping.
The cars are poorly designed to the point of being dangerous. They deserve it a little.
He’s probably a little high on the reality side to be honest.
It was removed due to supply chain, but Musk did seem to legitimately think optical only was better.
That’s more a product if the yt algorithm. For every one like you that is annoyed by the clickbait, there are a million others instantly clicking with no further thought. So if you don’t do that, you’re losing money.
Have you never heard of a mural before?
They were expecting this result to be possible. What were they supposed to do? Slam the car into the side if a building?
I feel bad for Nikola Tesla having his name associated with all this nonsense. Not even death let him escape from rich assholes taking credit for the work of others.
At this point ad blocking is more about security and optimization than stopping ads themselves. If a site wants to run some banner ads to pay for costs, I have nothing against it, but once Javascript is involved, that just becomes a vulnerability for attack.
Also, websites that bury their content in layers of overlay and popup ads with loud audio and several unrelated videos can go fuck themselves.
Because they are at the end of their growth phase and have entered their squeeze until dead phase.
The biggest risk would be IoT devices.
The rebuttal wasn’t as comforting as some are making it out to be. They seem to be more interested in the semantics of it not being a backdoor tied to a specific product, which appears to be true.
Rather it is a potential for vulnerability that exists in all wireless implementation, which seems to me to be a bigger issue.
Okay, but what’s the bad part here? That’s just a very generic overview of how donating works.
Need to start spoofing user agent strings again.
Sadly that changed with the Presidential Quarters. They minted them as legal tender for all presidents up to the then current president George W. Bush.
That’s not the real reason for the amendment. This is one of the few things where the real reason is right there in the text itself.
It was so they could easily assemble a defense force without the need of a standing army just like they did at the start of the revolution. Not so the peasant masses could more easily overthrow them.