I cannot read the article, but a part of me wishes that the USA forces Europe to become more indipendent.

Huawei was cut off with all the tariffs and was hit hard, but now they came back stronger than before, and this time around USA cannot hit them anymore:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NMFdYFmeiBA

Also I drive a van and I think it’s cool since obviously I’m cool and so my car kinda has to be, too, so I’m not sure if I agree with your first point

sorry, my mistakes. Vans can be absolutely cool. I think the electric one from VW is extremely cool. It’s just not the kind of cool that people with fragile masculinity would desire

In Copenhagen, meteorologists predict the city will receive 30% more rainfall by the end of this century.

Oh shit

But is it an unethical car? It fits a lot of stuff or a lot of people or a fair amount of both, but I guess the same thing is true for the f150. Visibility is much better I guess, but would pick ups be more moral if they had a lower hood?

some thoughts about your post

• nobody would buy a van if not in need, because it’s not cool, it costs more etc. So you would end up having less big vehicles on the road. There is no need to regulate too much something that is numerically not important
• the hood height for the van is lower and visibility is better: you can find a lot of studies that connect the former with less killings and less serious injuries and the latter with less collisions, so definitely less dangerous
• i actually think that if pickups had lower hoods, they would be more moral, yes, because they would be less dangerous. (see above)

Even if LLM “neurons” and their interconnections are modeled to the biological ones, LLMs aren’t modeled on human brain, where a lot is not understood.

The first thing is that how the neurons are organized is completely different. Think about the cortex and the transformer.

Second is the learning process. Nowhere close.

The fact explained in the article about how we do math, through logical steps while LLMs use resemblance is a small but meaningful example. And it also shows that you can see how LLMs work, it’s just very difficult

Very arrogant answer. Good that you have intuition, but the article is serious, especially given how LLMs are used today. The link to it is in the OP now, but I guess you already know everything…

Oh wow thank you! That’s it!

I didn’t even remember now good this article was and how many experiments it collected

I’m aware of this and agree but:

• I see that asking how an LLM got to their answers as a “proof” of sound reasoning has become common

• this new trend of “reasoning” models, where an internal conversation is shown in all its steps, seems to be based on this assumption of trustable train of thoughts. And given the simple experiment I mentioned, it is extremely dangerous and misleading

• take a look at this video: https://youtube.com/watch?v=Xx4Tpsk_fnM : everything is based on observing and directing this internal reasoning, and these guys are computer scientists. How can they trust this?

So having a good written article at hand is a good idea imho

What are your interests?

Anyway you could try following this community: https://lemmy.world/c/peertube

I think I’m on the right side of history

Do you?

I had lobbyists from car companies threaten me in my own office.

Ok thos is the proof. If oil and car lobbyist are angry at you then you definitely are on the right path!

It is free speech, but only for a selected few.