The development comes after a presentation to the International Olympic Committee by its medical chief, which highlighted the potential physical advantages of competing in women’s sport after being born male.

  • Triumph@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    What about the potential physical advantages of competing in women’s sport after being born strong?

    • manuallybreathing@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Of theres one thinf I know about babies, it’s that about half of them are born strong

      you clearly dont know what youre talking about

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      I question that as well. The strength advantage seems to be a factor of how early one transitions. If we figure that in, now we have another controversy, another fat can of worms.

      They’re probably thinking along these lines and just saying, “Fuck it, total ban, zero tolerance.”

      • Triumph@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        You may have misunderstood the point of my rhetorical question. I will elaborate.

        What about people who are born with XX chromosomes, and all the associated lady bits, who happen to be especially strong? Or tall? Or flexible? Or any other kind of physical difference that would give them an advantage in their chosen sport?

        Wouldn’t those people have exactly the same kind of “unfair advantage”?

        “Oh, wait, that’s not what we mean,” the Olympics organizers might say. “We are only concerned with one kind of innate physical difference, and not any others.”