US army secretary briefs ambassadors at ‘nightmare meeting’ in Kyiv on Friday after talks with Ukrainian leader

US officials have told Nato allies they expect to push president Volodymyr Zelenskyy into agreeing to a peace deal in the coming days, under the threat that if Kyiv does not sign, it will face a much worse deal in future.

The US army secretary, Dan Driscoll, briefed ambassadors from Nato nations at a meeting in Kyiv late on Friday, after talks with Zelenskyy and taking a phone call from the White House. “No deal is perfect, but it must be done sooner rather than later,” he told them, according to one person who was present.

The mood in the room was sombre, with several European ambassadors questioning the content of the deal and the way in which the US had conducted the negotiations with Russia without keeping allies informed.

  • gigachad@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    22 days ago

    Agent Krasnov doing his thing. One argument more for Europe to build up it’s military power and finally get their shit together.

  • dellish@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    22 days ago

    As horrible as it would be, if Ukraine never backs down and ends up going down in flames it will at least serve as a historical reminder of what happens when you treat the USA as a friend. This is a mark that would not be erased easily; Nazi Germany is still thought of and talked about almost 100 years since it happened, and Backstabbing USA would be no different.

    People will remember why Ukraine fell, and they will know who not to trust. The USA has spent a long, long time getting the world hooked on their technology and aid, and in one short year Trump has torn a lot of it down to the point that people globally are actively looking for alternatives.

    • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      22 days ago

      I mean, that was his goal. Either destroy trust to weaken our position globally for the benefit of someone else, or blind adherence to the belief that other countries are the only beneficiary of the relationship we have with them, and they need to “stop freeloading”. That in exchange for military defense, technology, aid, and everything else we get unparalleled military freedom, everyone meeting us on our terms and first mover advantage, control of global financial markets and preferential market access basically everywhere. Their boneheaded view that government is a business and everyone who came before just didn’t understand somehow is infuriating.

      • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        22 days ago

        I mean, that was his goal. Either destroy trust to weaken our position globally for the benefit of someone else,

        It’s not for the benefit of someone else though. Trump wants to intentionally destroy the US government by destroying its credibility both within and abroad. He does this by cutting foreign aid and pissing off all the US’ former allies, and by terrorizing the US population.

        His goal is to destroy the US as an institution because his key voters, which are southeners, think that they were forced to partake in the United States against their will back in the civil war from 1800, and that they should have a right to secede, and if it’s not given to them freely, they have to destroy the entire US just to get away from it.

        • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          21 days ago

          I’m inclined to disagree because I doubt he’s working for any voters. If he’s leaving office, he gains nothing from their support and if he’s planning to stay then splitting the country also weakens him.

          Further, sentiment among the southern population is very different from the civil war era.

  • PlutoniumAcid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    22 days ago

    Why is anyone listening to the US anymore? They are turning themselves into North Korea and losing any credibility they might have had. Who gives a shit what they say anymore?

    • Credibly_Human@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      22 days ago

      Because Europe has had half a decade to fill the void and they can’t get it done and continue to act like cost efficiency is the name of the game.

      Europeans seem to want to rag on about the US being irrelevant while being completely unwilling to put their money where their mouths are.

      I am very supportive of Europe, but they need to wake up to that reality and stop bickering about pennies.

      They should have been at wartime production years ago, and yet they still don’t even have a 5th let alone 6th gen fighter jet.

      The fact that the USA, who is currently chopping its own legs off, is managing to provide just about equally to the Ukrainian war effort to you, who are literally neighbours, should be embarrassing and sobering, but instead people just keep complaining and expecting the US to both shut up, and fix it.

    • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      22 days ago

      I agree, but US hardware are still top of the line which are essential for any countries to effectively combat Russian, and potential Chinese, aggression. Even part of the deal of EU and Trump is the former investing in the US military. Many countries also do not have the same military industrial complex that the US have, so many are too reliant for de facto protection. Trump is merely formalising and making money from that unwritten rule.

      • Spawn7586@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        22 days ago

        I mean, top of the line is an overstatement. It’s the quantities and the supply chain behind it that make it worth it, from a technological point of view they are good at best.

        • badgermurphy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          22 days ago

          There are definitely examples of US military boondoggle projects that didn’t result in high end military equipment getting made, but I think it is safe to say there are quite a few individual military tools and vehicles, supply chain notwithstanding, that are amazing triumphs of technology that have no equal.

          You can definitely make the case that the volume and overall scale of our military production are excessive in the extreme, but I think to remain intellectually honest, we must admit that they are good at what they do, even though what they do is not always good.

  • TheMinister@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    22 days ago

    And who exactly are these leaders working on behalf of? Because it sounds like this absolutely dogshit deal favors the Russians and gives them everything they want. They’re holding Ukraine at gunpoint and threatening them to accept a very unfavorable deal. With the Russians beside them.

  • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    edit-2
    22 days ago

    A deal with Russia isn’t worth the paper it’s written on.

    This war is only even possible because they’ve already violated an agreement they had with Ukraine. It would be insane for Ukraine to agree to a different deal for safety when they already did that and got back stabbed.

    Meanwhile Europe will push Ukraine not to sign the deal (not that much persuasion will be necessary) because Europe doesn’t want to set the precedent that Russia can just eat away at Europe.

    As for the threat from the US that Ukraine will get a worse deal if they don’t sign, given how crap the current deal is, I can’t see how it could reasonably get any worse, unless it’s total surrender, but that won’t fly because there would be literally no point even considering that. The Trump administration really are useless at negotiating, they think they can strong arm Ukraine, but they don’t actually have any cards.

  • Naevermix@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    21 days ago

    Ukraine will face worse in the future if they take the deal. Nations which went down fighting rose again, but those which tamely surrendered were finished.

  • Hemingways_Shotgun@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    21 days ago

    I literally have no horse in this race, but I still feel sick to my stomach thinking “please don’t cave in to this asshole and completely waste that many lives and years for nothing

    This is a make or break moment when Europe has to tell America to fuck off or it’ll be absolutely heartbreaking.

  • x00z@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    22 days ago

    What the fuck is the US doing?

    Well it’s obvious but how in the fuck

  • Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    22 days ago

    It would be nice if I could say I hope the Europeans will tell Trump to shove his idiotic “plan” where the sun don’t shine. If only they weren’t a bunch of fucking spineless twerps.

  • cosmicrookie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    22 days ago

    US says a lot of things often contradicting itself these days. If most of the world hasn’t stopped listening to what it has to say, it soon will

  • wirebeads@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    21 days ago

    America is such a pathetically weak country led by compromised pedophiles.

    Americans can kindly go fuck off under a rock in the ocean.

    Cowardly cunts, then entire fucking lot of you. Enjoy your new control under Russia pussies.

  • PhAzE@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    21 days ago

    You can literally replace “US” with “Russia” in this title and it would still make perfect sense.