Supposedly, I am a human, who does very human things.

  • 0 Posts
  • 21 Comments
Joined 12 days ago
cake
Cake day: October 19th, 2025

help-circle
  • But I still think that it’s not normal the number of people that now nothing about cooking, since, contrary to most hobbies, it is essential for us to eat.

    It is not essential to become a cooking enthusiast to eat.

    You can be perfectly healthy eating nothing be pre prepared meals and frozen vegetables.

    You can be perfectly healthy with a few family staples in a 3 set cookware set.

    You can be perfectly ok drinking soylent your whole life.

    People on these forums are often enthusiasts as described. They go overboard assuming everyone else must be like them, and this is often an excuse they use for their condescension as if there aren’t vastly different levels between eating because you need to for continued living and whatever the fuck they’re at.

    However I think that the real problem is that most people are so overworked and we have so much responsabilities, that it is almost a luxury to take the time to cook in our society.

    Nah. I think plenty of people simply do not enjoy cooking and thats perfectly fine. If I had less obligations and more time, I wouldn’t waste it learning to cook to the level they have. I have very little interest in cooking. Maybe occasionally Ill try a fancier recipe but I’m never going to season a pan, learn how to make Croquembouche or add beef wellington as a staple in the things that I eat.

    If I had more time, Id be putting that into my hobbies. Id be making more things, going more places, not wasting my time slaving over a kitchen counter.

    I fully respect that this is a completely subjective perspective. Obviously for some, they might read “waste” and feel incensed and that language, but that language is simply accurate for me. I don’t expect it to be accurate for everyone.

    I have lazily been buying the same bag of high fiber mixed vegetables for monthes because it has the mixture of things I need dietarily and I mix that with frozen meals that have reasonable mixes, and through in some simple cooked meals as well (I mean simple too, like scrambled eggs on toast or vegetable soup or meat with gravy on rice).

    To me the time would absolutely be a luxury, but cooking is not what I’d like to spend it on. To me, given we still have limited life spans, it would still be a waste of that span.




  • It truly is the way too many enthusiasts on any topic think.

    Like they can’t fathom the idea that other people are focused on other things despite this being 100% the reason humans were able to create what we have.

    If humans all focused on the exact same things, we’d have a very narrow scope and much less innovation.

    It’s why its so hard to find good advice.

    You go to a cooking subreddit, and they’d have you thinking that unless you knew every artisinal craftsman shop in your area (your local butcher, your local baker etc etc), you must not know food, and that you need 400 dollar pans to get utility out of your cookware when literally just a common stainless steel set would do you just fine, and even if you had to replace it 20 times, it still wouldnt be the cost of the more expensive one.

    People live in their own bubbles and expect that everyone else not only could but should meet them where they are in their bubble, rather than realizing that guess what, food is just to eat for most people, not some passion they want to dedicate multiple hours a day to.


  • part of it is that the working class, poor to people who incorrectly think they’re middle class included, basically everyone who is not ownership class (where owning things is the primary means of making them money), utterly fail to organize, and sometimes actively work against their own interests (like the “lets make a third party!” morons, the “I am morally superior for not voting” morons, and or course the actively malicious “I let the billionaires tell me that them fucking me was actually brown people’s fault” morons.




  • Uh, source? Do I know you?

    You don’t. That’s why its up to you to make your point when making statements like this.

    I’ve seen no such actions so without any particular claims, this is just fantasy posting.

    The leverage is numbers.

    I literally address the fact that you don’t have said leverage and wont get it any time soon in the very thing that you quote.

    No one is being convinced by your angsty, snarky, online leftist purity raging.

    And the organization at this point is just basic survival instinct?

    If you think basic survival instincts are in any way conducive to long term goals… I don’t even have a clever retort. That’s just an insane thing to think.

    We’re on a burning planet and being told that yes we need change, but we also need to wageslave while doing it.

    You aren’t told, thats the reality.

    People stop doing their jobs, without tremendous planning ahead, and they die.

    That’s reality.

    You are nowhere near having the capacity for a general strike, and you’re losing capacity as the tech feudal lords clamp down on the means of communication, and as people on decentralized platforms are notoriously completely impossible to deal with and hyper idealistic.

    Nice try glowie.

    See, it’s childish bullshit like this which means we can’t make progress.

    My point is clearly that nothing remotely like these fantastical ideas of an underground revolution are actually happening. We’ve seen these grumblings online for fucking decades.

    You’d think you’d have literally anything, like non personally, to show for it. Instead its nothing but talk.

    Some random not hyper online dude shooting a healthcare ceo in the back because his back hurt and he was hard done by them is the closest you’ve come to that, and it wasn’t you.

    I just know what has already happened in the past and can try to extrapolate.

    You are remembering selectively, and remembering out of context, because the US is not WW2 germany. They’re WW2 germany with nukes and a military multiples of times more formidable than the next multiple combined.

    There is no coalition of countries currently equipped to take them on.

    More than that, those countries are all having similar problems with right wing groups flaring up.

    More than that still, in recent history, when there have been revolts, they haven’t switched to socialism, or even just more socialism than before in notable ways. They’ve mostly just switched to more capitalism, supported by the US.

    And again, I don’t know what basis you have to speak of my character.

    Because once again, the online fringe you represent simply has no track record to speak of. They simply have not done anything for decades, and if they had any teeth, there would be something, anything to show for it.

    Jesus christ, is that the most radical, outside-of-the system take you could think of for global policy change?

    No, it isn’t the previous thing you absolutely do not have the guts or organization for is. This is the accomplishable thing that would not accomplish the final goals and instead would be handing right wing fascists the long term victory on a silver platter.


  • Have you ever considered taxes to pay for collective goods and services, making peoples lives easier, them smarter, building trust in the idea that government can work and giving the government more teeth?

    People will eat shit salads before they give up their F150s. We can’t just let people pay to avoid responsibility.

    The F150 people were sold on the ridiculous trucks by the automotive industry. Theyre also much smaller as a part of the problem.

    The people who make decisions we all feel forced to live with are the ones whose businesses choose the path of least resistance


  • No we don’t, and no it isn’t. That’s how the suppression of radical change works.

    You aren’t doing jack shit of this radical change you spout on about. You don’t actually want to help, so you come up with excuses to do nothing while feeling better than those who do because your ideas all start with someone else moving first.

    I am not saying that anything short of utopia is not worth pursuing, just that I don’t see why we shouldn’t start from that and then work down to a realistic compromise

    Because you don’t have the leverage or organization to start there. Instead you must start by slowly working to put out the fire and getting your fellow countryman to see the benefits of socialist policy.

    rather than starting from the bad options that are given to us.

    You exist in this system, not outside of it. You start here for that is reality, not fantasy. Id love to start from the position of being the rich using my wealth to sway policy. It’s not reality though.

    There are other choices, if you can look further than your nose.

    List one that doesn’t start with some fantastical revolution you aren’t organizing and aren’t willing to risk your life in as a first mover

    If the answer is about forming a new party in a country that has winner takes all or first past the post, I fear you’ve not thought it through.


  • No we don’t.

    What we really need is people to stop fantasizing about spherical revolutions in frictionless societies and do the boring, unfun, hard things that actually make a difference.

    It requires people not doing nothing until magically the perfect thing comes along and realizing they’ll have to wade through and actively support shit, until they’ve successfully reformed or composted said shit into something that is finally able to grow the first leafs of anything resembling a society they want.

    I’m just so tired of people rejecting the facts of the political systems they live under in order to pretend to chase some other system they won’t see within their life time.

    We have to pick the least bad option and then try to make them better because that’s just the way shit works. Acknowledging that doesn’t mean you are complicit or any other such nonsense in the same way acknowledging climate change doesn’t mean you don’t want a climate that isn’t rapidly deteriorating.

    “But if x, y, and z people just…” yeah well they won’t, and we know they won’t, so we have the constraints we have.

    Not super directed at you, I’ve just been seeing entirely too many naive, in my opinion, fake socialists that seem to only value socialism as far as they can use it as a weapon to brandish against liberals and other socialists who simply see reality and acknowledge that doing anything requires getting your hands dirty.