- cross-posted to:
- news@lemmy.world
- cross-posted to:
- news@lemmy.world
Regretful cities aren’t sure how to cancel their surveillance contracts, so they are literally covering their cameras.
Regretful cities aren’t sure how to cancel their surveillance contracts, so they are literally covering their cameras.
Why aren’t they just… Removing them?
Oh. Its probably because removing them is unnecessarily complicated so they need the company to come do it for them.
If I remember correctly the agreement is some kind of lease, so the city/county doesn’t really own them after they are installed.
I’ve heard the excuse that they’re private property so they can’t. They’re not hard to remove though. They’re usually just attached to poles with pipe clamps.
You don’t have to worry about a complicated removal if you have an angle grinder.
on a totally unrelated topic, but harbor freight is a great place to get affordable tools.
And if you time your visit right, free bucket!
You’d be surprised how few worries I have when I’m brandishing an angle grinder
If you had read the article you’d know that the cities aren’t sure if they can remove them under the terms of their contracts with flock. So they’re covering them while working that out.
I’m pretty sure one city did remove them and then Flock just came and put new ones up which is what lead to the trash bags.
We don’t do that here bro
Why read all article when some article good enough?
What am I? Some kind of readist? A phisosopher?
READING FOR NERDS