Regretful cities aren’t sure how to cancel their surveillance contracts, so they are literally covering their cameras.

  • addie@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I’d like to think that the bag is step 1. Step 2 is to balance an old car tire on top, and set it on fire.

      • felbane@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago
        1. City installs trash bags because they’re contractually obligated to keep the devices installed and powered on
        2. Someone hosts an impromptu Office Space fan meetup, with a fun reenactment of the printer scene
        3. City sees this, responds with an obvious but legally non-actionable tweet response suggesting it continue (e.g. “Fartsburg loves Mike Judge films, too! So nice to see our citizens enjoying the various forms of recreation and socialization ths city has to offer.”), along with some conspicuously-placed garbage cans near all of the cameras’ installed locations.
        4. ???
        5. (No) Profit. (for Flock)
    • Agent641@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      They don’t just collect video either. Audio, network traffic, Bluetooth devices, tons of electronic intelligence can still be gotten with covered cameras

        • M137@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Don’t think they’ll do much against the audio, but that seems like it won’t be much use by itself. Though that doesn’t matter, it’s the principle that matters, they shouldn’t be allowed to record audio like that no matter how useless it is.

      • abigscaryhobo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        I don’t know how, but I bet there’s an enterprising way to make a nice cheap battery powered Bluetooth scrambler that can be stuck right on one of those poles with a magnet and just absolutely ruin their signals.

      • trackball_fetish@lemmy.wtf
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        The Bluetooth tracking is much more sinister than people know. The city I’m in has devices specifically for this placed strategically along with the alpr and cameras. Its fuckin’ wild. Can’t even leave without them tracking you.

      • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Welp. It’s too bad the shitty hotel I used to work at got shut down by the city.

        We had TONS of meth heads that would be very appriciative of that information.

      • potoooooooo 🥔@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Really though, don’t do the precious metals part, cuz that’s what will get you caught. Carefully destroying them? Very doable, I strongly suspect.

        • Barbecue Cowboy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          The precious metals content realistically isn’t interesting at all unfortunately. You could make a bit reselling the internal components (like probably not even 3 digits), but the value on the actual copper/etc is negligible. The solar panel is probably the most interesting piece, but the components are cheap as fuck.

          • halferect@lemmy.world
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            Its to encourage meth heads who only need 20 bucks and are desperate enough to go to jail for a lil bit of copper

      • Kowowow@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        I would have bit of extra respect for a youtuber breaking down to get the precious metals out of specifically flok cameras

  • MrKoyun@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Why aren’t they just… Removing them?

    Oh. Its probably because removing them is unnecessarily complicated so they need the company to come do it for them.

  • vagrancyand@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Fun fact the panel, inverter, and battery set up in these do not have any tracking features, that’s all in the internals for the camera controller. It’s enough to charge any smart phone or tablet if someone you know is living outside and should have a need of that. You do not need anything more than a Philips head screwdriver for most versions, and a security bit for others, both of which you can have for pennies at any hardware store.

    • Pika@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      honestly idk why they bothered covering them. just disconnect them… as long as they aren’t damaged I doubt flock could seek anything on it.

  • w3dd1e@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    This is an better idea. I was going to shoot them with a paintball gun.

  • otp@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    the city was sharing Flock camera data for immigration enforcement

    Ah, these are in American cities.

    apparently on accident,

    Oh yes, definitely American.

    (Yes I know I skipped over the part about Ohio)

  • tekato@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    If it’s already paid for might as well use them, what a waste of tax dollars. Or at least hit them with a bat and break them if you actually plan on not using them anymore. Covering them with plastic bags allows them to walk it back whenever they feel like it.