Speaking for the US many populated arid areas are completely unsustainable as population centers (ironically also where most people in the US have been moving for awhile now), especially because water resources haven’t been managed rationally in many arid areas. This story will absolutely be a global one though, see Tehran for one massive example, Lake Mead for another. No water and deadly heat waves are going to make for limitless ghost town tourism attraction opportunities!

The future is bright for abandoned building photography communities!

  • CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    I in a city that is a confluence of two rivers and the next city over is known for its aquifer.

    Yet, the city government has hired consultants to come up with ideas for how to handle expected water shortages in the area as a result of development. Not to get all /c/collapse but it sure does make me feel negative about humanity’s effect on the planet.

    Add to the list Mexico City, which hasn’t had water for a while.

  • tensorpudding@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    8 days ago

    I suspect coal country in Kentucky, WV and rural PA and Virginia and the western plains in Nebraska and Kansas, which are already severely stressed with population loss, will see some real ghost towns soon. Especially if the Ogallala aquifer dries up in the latter case.

  • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    I recently took a ‘no tolls’ route south through rural Oklahoma and Texas and saw many of these dead and dying small towns.

    Many had a fat county sheriff hanging out to ticket people driving through.

    It really is sad to see it. Those people are all now living in suburbs and slowly being driven out of their neighborhoods there by cost of living too.

  • tronx4002@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    I think this will happen for reasons other than water too. So many towns in America were built to be in close proximity to train lines, who’s locations today makes no strategic or economic sense.

    I believe many will hit critically low population levels where they can no longer support hospitals, schools, grocery stores, churches, etc

  • reddig33@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    8 days ago

    It’s happened before with mining towns and the early days of the oil boom. Lots of still abandoned towns in the middle of nowhere.

    • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 days ago

      not if they’re abandoned because they don’t have accessible clean water, affordable power etc…

      people aren’t walking away from livable places.

        • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 days ago

          I could see them buying up places and doing the slumlord thing but otherwise, it’ll be a net loss for them too: fewer educated workers for their empires

          but I doubt they’ll care until it hurts.

  • someguy3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 days ago

    You can recycle your water very well. Vegas has a very low loss rate. It will be cheaper to pipe water in to replace losses than build an entire new city.