• theskyisfalling@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    26 days ago

    Your analogies make no sense either.

    I presume the headline is alluding to how eventually people accepted cars are better than horses but then your “better” analogies make no sense.

    Auto vs manual, neither is “better”, it depends more on situation and personal preference. I’d take a manual over auto any day personally.

    Power steering vs not again depends on application. I’d rather have no power steering in a little sports car and get more positive feedback but would rather power steering on some heavy unwieldly vehicle.

    A map vs sat nav bullshit. I’m guessing more people would argue the latter being “better” in this case but there are plenty of people who would rather read a map and know exactly where they are rather than blindly follow shit.

    So yeh I really don’t understand what you are driving at with your analogies and don’t think they work for the context unless I’m misunderstanding :)

    • CerebralHawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      26 days ago

      No, they make sense, and I thank you for being transparent with your biases. That’s not common online, but it’s a standard I strive for and respect.

      The same kind of person who prefers manual transmission would prefer a gas engine. Let’s look at Mustang drivers. Nuff Said. (For those who don’t get it, Google “1969 Mustang Eleanor” and “Mustang EV”. One is a work of art. The other is a crime against automobile style or at least should never have been called Mustang — would have been a great opportunity to revive the Ford Galaxy brand.)

      • dkppunk@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        26 days ago

        I agree with most of what you’ve been saying, but I’m going to gently push back on the Mustang EV. I think it’s one of the best looking EVs out there and it would be the one that I would choose (or the Subie EV because I love my Crosstrek). I do agree that it probably should not have been called a Mustang though because it doesn’t really look like one and there’s a whole culture thing behind the Mustang.

        I would be thrilled if there was a manual shift EV. I know it doesn’t make sense and I don’t care if it doesn’t really do what combustion engines do, but I loved driving stick. I was sad to give up my old stick, but I went for the car with much higher safety ratings. It doesn’t even have to be real, just give me that feeling of driving manual would be great. And with a proper stick shifter too, not the silly paddle shifters.

      • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        26 days ago

        No one cares about the name behind a car. The original mustang was a high volume piece of shit car that only resonated with Boomers.

    • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      26 days ago

      there are plenty of people who would rather read a map and know exactly where they are rather than blindly follow shit.

      Ok Boomer. Following a sat nav is not blindly following. Does your map predict the future? Tell you where construction and traffic is?