• dropped_the_chief@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    I’m loathe to find out how he’s going to fail his way upwards from this. It’s going to pop, and he’s going to tumble upwards like he always does. Capitalism is a system that props fools like this up.

  • Inucune@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    Better start hauling asteroids for mining. Nothing else is going to have that level of ROI.

  • brachiosaurus@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    All they have to do is to start putting ads on space and none of us will be able to do anything about it because we are a bunch of peasants.

    • racemaniac@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 days ago

      Just so you know: the valuation of SpaceX has nothing to do with the space side of the company. If you look at their projected revenue, the rockets etc… are a footnote. but SpaceX acquired XAI, and literally all of this projected growth is SpaceX becoming the leading AI company in the next decade.

      (and i wish i was joking, but i see everybody here wondering how a space company could possible grow that much, or be expected to. And the answer obviously is it can’t, and noone expects it to. But an AI company in this AI bubble, that people believe…)

      • jj4211@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 days ago

        Remember, Musk also proposes a combination. That AI will, for whatever stupid ass reason, become predominantly space based and that they would be having hundreds of Starship launches a month…

        • chilicheeselies@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 days ago

          That’s another Elon BS special. Dissapating heat in space is very difficult because you can only do it via radiation, which is weak.

          • dltk@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 days ago

            Then there’s the massive amounts of heavy metals that get deposited in the upper atmosphere when the satellite datacenters ultimately reenter and burn up. Good bye ozone layer.

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 days ago

        I wonder the opposite: when the ai bubble pops, will it take spacex with it?

  • plyth@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    Unless people develop a strange love for this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SpaceX_Starshield

    satellites designed to provide new military space capabilities to U.S. and allied governments

    The primary project SpaceX is reportedly vying for are contracts for the Golden Dome space weapons system.

    That’s the ticket to win nuclear war and it will be priced accordingly.

    • SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      As long as there is a sucker willing to pay more they will gain money. And unfortunately there are millions of suckers on the planet. Fundamentals don’t mean anything with this IPO. It’s basically all hype based like Pokemon cards.

      • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 days ago

        One of the big problems with investing is that the average investor thinks they’re smarter than the average investor.

        • scratchee@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 days ago

          It’s inevitable, anyone wise enough to doubt their ability to outplay the market chooses not to try, the remainder all think they can

            • scratchee@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 days ago

              That’s true. I guess you just have to think you can keep up with the market, not necessarily beat it.

          • isleepinahammock@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 days ago

            Don’t be so smug. The intended victims of this IPO are passive investors who aren’t trying to time the market and are just long-term holding index funds for retirement. That’s exactly who Musk is planning to rob. If you’re taking the typical low-cost index fund strategy, you will be giving approximately 1% of your life savings to Elon Musk.

    • brachiosaurus@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      Because he has a massive public presence. Why do people like mcdonald and not burgermeister? Because they have never hear of the latest. The proper way to give this guy the middle finger is to stop giving him any exposure if not for serious stuff that show he’s scum.

  • Sludgehammer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    Right, but hear me out: I know that SpaceX is impossibly overvalued and that makes me smart. So what if I bought some SpaceX stock, waited for some rubes to buy the stock from me at higher price and then I cashed out? Since I’m so smart, I’m sure I could get in and get out before the whole thing falls apart. /s

    • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      Boomers kept saying this too. For the sake of future generations please stop; it can indeed get worse than what is currently doomed to happen.

      • Sanctus@anarchist.nexus
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 days ago

        I need you to look around with your eyes. Boomers may have said this but they were being the complaining bitches they were born to be. We have multiple real humanity-at-stake crisis happening here. People are going to starve in 5-10 years due to what is happening right now. We’re going to see mass climate migrations that haven’t been seen since the ending of the Ice Age but in reverse. Who decides who starves when the food runs out? We’ll find out.

        • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 days ago

          I need you to understand that all of this was crystal clear decades ago. I said doomed because yes I am aware of how bad it is.

          It can and will get worse if we give up on life itself.

          • Sanctus@anarchist.nexus
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 days ago

            So what’s your point? Dont hark cause its scary? Genuinely confused why we shouldn’t talk about it, yet its doomed to happen.

            • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 days ago

              I’m asking you to stop saying “it doesn’t matter”, not to stop talking about it. You’re looking at a world drastically different from the one in which you grew up and discounting it entirely, which implies that pollution no longer matters.

              • Sanctus@anarchist.nexus
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                7 days ago

                You’ve interpreted my “it doesn’t matter” as apathy instead of the observation that it was. It doesn’t matter that SpaceX supposedly has to do something impossible to justify their valuation. They were never going to be valued honestly and they’ll never have to justify that evaluation.

  • [object Object]@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    That’s 59% growth annually, every year, for 10 years straight.

    Any miss or early miss throws the schedule off significantly.

  • thisbenzingring@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    If they can get to an astroid with some titanium or other rare minerals, they can probably be worth it. But I don’t see that happening in my lifetime

    • MadMadBunny@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      Mining such an asteroid will only destroy the metals’ market value into oblivion by nullifying it rarity.

      • Alexstarfire@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 days ago

        I’m not so sure. That would certainly be the case if you had access to it all at once, but that’s almost certainly not how it would work. Just like how we don’t have access to all of it’s that’s available on earth at once. It’ll be more like a new mine opening up.

        This is assuming we don’t mine multiple asteroids at once or open a ton of new mines on a single asteroid. We may get there at some point but that won’t be how it starts. It’ll almost certainly start as a one off, if it gets there at all.

    • CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      Getting there isn’t a problem. The problem is what you do once you’re there. There’s no way to mine an asteroid and bring those minerals back to earth and I don’t see any way for that to change for quite a long time.

    • Aniki@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      the moment that rare minerals become plentiful, they devalue. you can’t get a trillionaire with asteroid mining