'So you think’is almost always followed by disingenuous arguments, no change here. I like to focus on real, measurable problems, not knee jerk whenever some rich cunt wants to distract me. Why are you so selectively outraged?
Selectively outraged by police actions. Selectively outraged by who is carrying weapons. You should think about why you’re so easy to manipulate.
Why u dont answer my simple question ?
It s outrageous to have an exception regarding permit to carry weapon whatever religion involved. Why you think I should be ok with that ?
I told you, this isn’t a serious question asked by a serious person, discussing a serious problem. It’s a distraction from the Epstein class robbing you blind.
You don’t really care about police actions, else your discussion would be very different. You don’t care about people carrying weapons, else your discussion would be very different.
It s outrageous to have an exception regarding permit to carry weapon whatever religion involved.
You can be outraged by whatever you want. Well, you can be outraged by whatever the Epstein class wants you to be outraged by. You are, beautifully distracted as they pilfer your pockets. Feeling poorer recently? The rich aren’t, where do you think they got that money?
Why you think I should be ok with that ?
Because it’s literally not a measurable problem. Take it to someone more gullible.
lmao u can claim anything isnt a real concern cause it s not the epstein class ?
That’s how burden of proof works. If you want to claim something is a problem you have to prove it: with proof. That’s why I linked to an article discussing an actual report about actual and measurable discrimination in the police force. That’s why I linked to an actual article showing the right don’t really care about weapons, they carry them when they want. That’s why I linked to an actual article showing you the Epstein class are robbing you blind.
You can tell me your fee fees are outraged all you want. Show me an actual study that says kirpans, in particular, are used for stabbings all over the land.
That’s how burden of proof works. If you want to claim something is a problem you have to prove it: with proof.
Somone got litteraly killed because of that exception. that s my proof.
You can tell me your fee fees are outraged all you want. Show me an actual study that says kirpans, in particular, are used for stabbings all over the land.
Just one is enough and tbh that exception should have never happened in the first place. I have no idea how you can justify something being obviously bad cause it doesnt correspond to your arbitrary criteria.
That’s why I linked to an actual article showing the right don’t really care about weapons
How is it a right wing take to said religious exception to carry weapon is fucking dumb ???
‘Just one is enough’ when it comes to Sikhs, but no one, and nothing else it seems.
Care to explain that little bit of bias? ‘Just one is enough’, just shows how selectively outraged you are.
You can’t lean on ‘state discrimination’, we already established you don’t really give two shits about state discrimination. You can’t lean on ‘deadly weapons’, we already established you don’t really give two shits about deadly weapons.
I have no idea how you can justify something being obviously bad cause it doesnt correspond to your arbitrary criteria.
… I don’t know what to tell you: you have your outrage, and I’m not convinced by your outrage.
Show me meaningful data that kirpans, in particular, are a problem and I’ll be convinced. I’ve shown you how to convince me, you can do it at any time.
Your turn, what would convince you that the Epstein class are just boosting this story so you’re annoyed at Sikhs and not them?
You’re right. The state does literally discriminate based on ethnicity.
The right don’t care about carrying weapons. In fact they love carrying knives.
Take your selective outrage to someone more gullible. You’re distracting from the epstein class robbing us blind.
So yeah, I’m fine with it. Show me facts that kirpan stabbings are a problem in the uk, they’re not.
So u think x is ok cause y is worse ??? Are u sure about that ?
'So you think’is almost always followed by disingenuous arguments, no change here. I like to focus on real, measurable problems, not knee jerk whenever some rich cunt wants to distract me. Why are you so selectively outraged?
Selectively outraged by police actions. Selectively outraged by who is carrying weapons. You should think about why you’re so easy to manipulate.
Why u dont answer my simple question ? It s outrageous to have an exception regarding permit to carry weapon whatever religion involved. Why you think I should be ok with that ?
I told you, this isn’t a serious question asked by a serious person, discussing a serious problem. It’s a distraction from the Epstein class robbing you blind.
You don’t really care about police actions, else your discussion would be very different. You don’t care about people carrying weapons, else your discussion would be very different.
You can be outraged by whatever you want. Well, you can be outraged by whatever the Epstein class wants you to be outraged by. You are, beautifully distracted as they pilfer your pockets. Feeling poorer recently? The rich aren’t, where do you think they got that money?
Because it’s literally not a measurable problem. Take it to someone more gullible.
lmao u can claim anything isnt a real concern cause it s not the epstein class ? can i do the same regarding other topics ?
That’s how burden of proof works. If you want to claim something is a problem you have to prove it: with proof. That’s why I linked to an article discussing an actual report about actual and measurable discrimination in the police force. That’s why I linked to an actual article showing the right don’t really care about weapons, they carry them when they want. That’s why I linked to an actual article showing you the Epstein class are robbing you blind.
You can tell me your fee fees are outraged all you want. Show me an actual study that says kirpans, in particular, are used for stabbings all over the land.
Me: you’re selectively outraged here’s how, here’s why.
You: can I be selectively outraged about other topics?
I’m sure you can, I’m sure you are. You’ll be outraged by whatever the Epstein class tells you to be outraged about.
Somone got litteraly killed because of that exception. that s my proof.
Just one is enough and tbh that exception should have never happened in the first place. I have no idea how you can justify something being obviously bad cause it doesnt correspond to your arbitrary criteria.
How is it a right wing take to said religious exception to carry weapon is fucking dumb ???
‘Just one is enough’ when it comes to Sikhs, but no one, and nothing else it seems.
Care to explain that little bit of bias? ‘Just one is enough’, just shows how selectively outraged you are.
You can’t lean on ‘state discrimination’, we already established you don’t really give two shits about state discrimination. You can’t lean on ‘deadly weapons’, we already established you don’t really give two shits about deadly weapons.
… I don’t know what to tell you: you have your outrage, and I’m not convinced by your outrage.
Show me meaningful data that kirpans, in particular, are a problem and I’ll be convinced. I’ve shown you how to convince me, you can do it at any time.
Your turn, what would convince you that the Epstein class are just boosting this story so you’re annoyed at Sikhs and not them?