• RedstoneValley@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    About the Bosch E-Bike, I have a bike with a Bosch motor and they really are that bad. The bike comes with an app and you need to give them your personal data to “unlock” basic features of the app and an electronic bike lock. If you want to let another person use that bike, you need a subscription. I deleted the app. Fuck Bosch.

      • RedstoneValley@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Didn’t find anything, and it would probably void the warranty. But on the upside, using the app isn’t necessary to operate the bike, and the most important features work with the controller/display on the handlebar. The motor lock is disabled for now and I’m resorting to more traditional methods of bike security… a chain lock. The motor lock has a huge disadvantage anyways because it depends on a bluetooth connection to the app on a phone. If that phone for some reason doesn’t work or is unavailable then the bike is essentially bricked. It’s a heavy and bulky cargo bike, so being stranded somewhere with a blocked motor would be bad.

      • xxce2AAb@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        “It automatically does a facial scan of any household visitors using Palantir’s database and knocks the way they would have.”

        “Couldn’t they just, you know, knock?”

        “Sure, but then how would we track who’s visiting you while making you pay the power bill for our surveillance devices?”

  • AA5B@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    I just got a WiFi stove that should be marketed as one of those bad ideas.

    My requirements were

    • induction burners
    • air fryer

    The closest I could find had all this “smart” crap, and convection oven was as close as I could get to air fryer

    • tessa@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      An air fryer is literally a convection oven, so that part was accomplished. But a wifi stove is just bizarre.

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Yes and no. My understanding is an air fryer is just more convection. No actual definition but some brands have both convection and air fry. But I couldn’t find that with an induction top.

        This does have “convection bake” vs “convection roast”, so I still need to understand what distinction they’re making

        I’ll figure it out as I cook more. I do have a countertop air fryer that I was hoping to get rid of (I need the counter space) that I used a lot for chicken breasts and stuff. But the ultimate test is tofu. I’ve never been able to make tofu right so if I can use the convection oven to get the right consistency, I’m golden

      • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        This is functional, but looks ugly as sin and I don’t see how it’s better than an integrated stovetop? Those are also usually separate from the oven so you’re still good on the oven if the stovetop dies.

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Interesting idea, and a great money saver! I find it strange that portable induction cooktops are so much cheaper and at least seem more technically advanced than a fill sized range.

        But yeah, more clutter and probably not great for selling a house. Not for me

  • floofloof@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Samsung said in response that “a trade show floor is naturally very different from a consumer’s home environment. Our Bespoke AI experiences are designed to simplify decisions around the home, making life more convenient and enjoyable.”

    The South Korean tech giant also said “security and privacy are foundational” to the AI experiences in the fridge.

    They deserve to sell none of their shitty fridges.

    • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      This is the same Samsung that sold fridges with giant LCD screens on them, ostensibly to help the buyer, but then later turned that expensive screen into a billboard showing ads to the fridge buyer in their kitchen (source). Samsung has shown who they are. Anyone that buys an AI fridge from them will have no one to blame but themselves.

      • thejml@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        I feel like the problem here is that you get people who are curious or like the other features the fridge has and just get what they can when theirs goes out. And while, sure, those people learn not to do that again, by that point the industry used that sales data as a “they must like it, lets do it across the board!” Instead of asking people or taking anything else into account when figuring out what products to continue making.

        In 10 yrs when those fridges die and people who “learned their lesson” go to buy a new fridge, there will be zero fridges without AI because marketing thought thats why they bought it and no one has any ability to buy a non-AI fridge anymore.

        • aesthelete@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          In 10 yrs when those fridges die and people who “learned their lesson” go to buy a new fridge

          That’s more like two years for Samsung fridges, where the designers and builders spend all of their time on fancy horseshit and ignore basic requirements like “keep the food cold”.

        • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          I feel like the problem here is that you get people who are curious or like the other features the fridge has and just get what they can when theirs goes out. And while, sure, those people learn not to do that again,

          Part of what makes us intelligent is learning from others. I guess I would expect buyers to do even the most basic research on a large dollar figure purchase which would likely expose them to the headlines about Samsung putting ads on fridges after the sale.

          Do people actually just walk into an appliance store and just drop more than $1k on what they see on the floor without researching reliability, warranty, or other features from articles and news sources?

          • smh@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            I did buy a replacement refrigerator based on “no ice dispenser, fits in available space” on a Saturday when mine let out the magic smoke that morning. It was delivered the next day and worked out ok.

            I would not get something fancier without doing research. This one was literally the only refrigerator that fit the bill at the store (weird-sized refrigerator alcove)

            • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              Was that the only refrigerator store close to you, so even if there were other choices that fit manufactured you wouldn’t have been able to lay your hands on one?

              • smh@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                4 months ago

                There was Home Depot, Best Buy, and Lowes. I looked at their in-stock offerings online and only one of them had something that would work. I tried out a floor model, it seemed fine. I couldn’t spend too much time on the decision because I was playing host and didn’t want my house guest to worry about her food spoiling. (She has dietary restrictions and enough food anxiety as it is.)

                • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  Well sure, if you’re in a time crunch that makes sense. Additionally, you did attempt to shop elsewhere, but in your case it was such a specialized opening you only had one choice from all the retailers available to you. I imagine, had there been multiple to choose from, you would have examined the choices more closely, right?

        • atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          I think you are giving people too much credit. Lots of people have a budget they can spend on appliances (like a credit line) and they get the best (most expensive) one they can get on that budget. Others will do the opposite and get the cheapest but only people like you find on Lemmy (Linux users for instance) in my experience will make a choice in the middle based on feature set.

          • anomnom@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            I went with the middle dish washer and it has tuned out to be a series of planned obsolescence repairs. I’m handy enough to do them all, but I know it’s just a matter of time.

            We’re on year six (it had a 5 year warranty). I’m determined to make it last until 10 at least.

    • RamRabbit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      “security and privacy are foundational” to the AI experiences in the fridge

      My AI-less, internet-less fridge is quite private and secure. Furthermore, it keeps food perfectly cold!

      It isn’t sexy, but products that just work are 100x better than products with 40 features that can all brick it for no reason or annoy you to death.

      • vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        There’s an effort combination here - to buy things that just work, you need not only demand, but their sufficient production and companies choosing that niche to concentrate, because they don’t have an option of something with “AI”.

        It’s like negotiation, of what to produce. There’s elasticity of demand based on niche similar to that of demand by price. If you need a fridge and there are only AI fridges offered, you’ll buy an AI fridge.

        So you won’t be able to buy something that just works when all companies with sufficient power to design and produce fridges want AI.

        There’s also some stickiness there, like a hysteresis, and the current combined effort at AI promotion, even if not at equilibrium of said AI’s attractiveness for said elasticity, will hold. Unless there will be another combined effort at killing it with fire.

        That is similar to 4:3 display ratio, ergonomic user interfaces, or perhaps home appliances that came with schematics, but not anymore.

      • njordomir@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Yup, I think an ice dispenser and a fancy-schmancy high speed water tap is justifiable for most people, but I can’t think of a realistic use case for a screen that outweighs the many negatives.

      • Jrockwar@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        It might not be sexy, but I’d argue it doesn’t need AI to be.

        Take the SMEG ones as an example - they’re not my cup of tea, but the amount of people who are willing to pay a premium for a fridge that doesn’t do anything special other than looking nice shows clearly that.

        Image

      • someacnt@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        You know that is a lie, a lip service for the gullible mass. Samsung just does not care about security and privacy because it does not boost their profits.

    • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      The South Korean tech giant also said “security and privacy are foundational” to the AI experiences in the fridge.

      suck it, Jin Yang

    • nyan@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Even their older, simpler fridges are crappy. We bought one because our previous fridge conked out in mid-pandemic when the selection of new appliances was low. It lasted about three years before developing an issue that would have cost us more to fix than just replacing the damned thing. So we replaced it with some cheaper probably-Chinese brand I’d never heard of before and will never buy another Samsung appliance again if we can help it. AI will just add expensive, useless functions on top of their already poor design and dubious manufacturing.

      In other words, if these become the only fridges in existence, I may just try to find out where I can purchase an old-fashioned icebox.

      • W98BSoD@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        I have a rule: if the company has ever made a mobile phone or TV I will never buy their appliance.

    • darkmarx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I’ve had a few Samsung appliances. They are, by far, the worst appliances I’ve owned. I will not be buying another from them. If they want to make life more convenient, they need to make better devices, not shove screens, wifi, and AI into their crappy products.

      • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Don’t worry, in the realm of major appliances the majority of what these bozos are calling “AI” actually isn’t. They’re just using it as a buzzword because they think it’s popular.

        LG, selling a washing machine two years ago: “It has weight sensors to determine the load size.”

        LG, selling the same damn washing machine today: “With exclusive LG® AI DD™ Technology!!!”

        (I am not making this up.)

    • SharkAttak@kbin.melroy.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      a trade show floor is naturally very different from a consumer’s home environment.

      So it’s like fashion shows, where they have the most ridiculous shit walking down the catwalk, instead of actual clothes that people will wear?

  • Kissaki@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    a candy that plays music while you eat it

    What the heck. The whole paragraph is so ‘unnecessary technology’.

  • Rose@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    A candy that plays music while you eat it

    This is the sort of misapplication of technology that traumatised me as a kid, dammit

    • ThomasWilliams@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      When I was in year 5 the kids in the class had been working cutting apricots and they bought tonnes of candy and these whistles they were blowing all the time.

      How much did the whistles cost ? one cent.

      True story.

  • TrackinDaKraken@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Screaming is well and good to build public opinion against this stupidity, but all the CEOs in their towers will heed is no sales.

    We need to make it uncool to like or tolerate AI bullshit in consumer products.

    If you have friends, and they show you their new fridge with a touch screen, don’t be polite. Tell them it’s the stupidest thing you’ve ever seen, and then mock them for choosing it every chance you get. And, no, I don’t have friends anymore (but, this is not why).

    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Heckling your friends after they dropped $3k on some sloppy fridge is kinda cruel. Advise them hard when they ask for advice - here’s where you say “everyone will laugh” and “stupidest idea” - but commiserate when they realize what they’ve got.

      You want to be in a position to offer advice for the next sloppy purchase.

    • Disillusionist@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Hilarious. I bite my tongue so often around these kinds of situations it has permanent tooth imprints in it. But you’re right, someone needs to figure out how to get them to stop tolerating this horrific nonsense.

  • WanderingThoughts@europe.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    And they’ll probably shut down the AI servers in a few years for cost reduction making the whole thing a huge waste of money.

    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      probably shut down the AI servers in a few years for cost reduction making the whole thing a huge waste of money.

      It’s like you’ve seen the Portal video chat units. (What a beautiful piece of hardware)