• plyth@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    But it’s a democracy

    That’s a nice benefit but we can’t use the Indian trade agreement as an example of European independence if it serves the US strategy.

    defending multilateralism and the rules-based international order.

    As opposed to the multipolar order. This is not opposing the US. France, and thus the EU, were not so long ago excluded from a nuclear submarine deal. I doubt that Australia switched to relying on the EU.

    we should cleverly flood the Arabic peninsula with euroes through energy trade. To make Saudi Arabia assert its soft power in Africa and weaken the US in the process.

    I don’t think Saudi Arabia can be bought like that. Saudi Arabia was made by the US. Also, how would the EU benefit? Saudi Arabia most likely has their own goals.

    There’s no way we can break a US blockade on Cuba,

    True, but we could try to deliver and more prominently rub it in that the US are violating international law.

    Cuba is too insignificant to cause a greater international reaction

    That’s when international law matters. If we don’t defend it or at least try, we signal that it is only there to suppress the ambitions of small countries.

    • BlaestEgnen@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 days ago

      we can’t use the Indian trade agreement as an example of European independence if it serves the US strategy.

      It serves European strategy, as one step to further isolate Russia, to ensure countries we’re closer aligned to are in better positions. Of the three global tigers (China, India, USA), India is the lesser evil.

      Sure India counters China in regional presence, but that’s not the ways USA cares about countering China. India would honestly trade Taiwan for complete soft control of Southeast Asia.

      As opposed to the multipolar order.

      That doesn’t exist, there’s at least 4 polars today. Usa, China, India and EU. There could be arguments for the Arabic peninsula being a 5th major polar.

      Also, how would the EU benefit?

      Trading energy in euroes, would make more euroes float and make the euro as a currency stronger. The more a currency is adapted, the stronger it is.

      It’s the entire tenant behind US growth, the petrodollar. Making the world swim in dollars, which they end up investing back in the US and the US can then buy new shit overseas. The Euro would achieve a similar effect if it bought its energy in euroes, with a third intermediary being Africa. Saudi Arabia would invest in Africa, Africa would buy a mix of food and industrial equipment in Europe and the triangle trade is in motion

      rub it in that the US are violating international law.

      fair

      That’s when international law matters. If we don’t defend it or at least try, we signal that it is only there to suppress the ambitions of small countries.

      An idealists statement, but it’s not how the world spins around