Study led by researchers at the Bloomberg School of Public Health finds boys circumcised just after birth did not have a higher risk of autism compared to uncircumcised boys
It’s not the best analogy, sure. Your reaction is worse though. It’s like reacting to someone who takes offence at hearing about a knife attack by saying “stop being so upset about other people’s internal organs, it is fucking creepy”.
Im not surprised
But i am surprised that mutilating your childs genitals without their consent … is perfectly legal
What next… we make a religion that wants to cuts off your own babies ears?
Wanna prevent me from doing that? Thats <insert bigotry term> against me and my beliefs
i’ve always compared it to eyelids
skin flap helps keep a semi internal organ lubricated and protected
technically not immediately necessary to function but results in major issues after prolonged absence
people get super offended and upset because removing an eyelid would clearly be abuse
lmao fucking americans
This is not even close to the same thing. Your argument is invalid. Stop being so upset about other people’s genitals, it is fucking creepy.
hey here’s one in the wild! lmao lmao
Look at it… So twisted in it’s view of the world… Fascinating…
It’s not the best analogy, sure. Your reaction is worse though. It’s like reacting to someone who takes offence at hearing about a knife attack by saying “stop being so upset about other people’s internal organs, it is fucking creepy”.
So your fine with female circumcision? Or where do you draw the line?