• Techno-rat@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    Lol, lmao even. What about all the russian bots spewing political propaganda 24/7, just to name one of the millions of glaring examples?

    Obvious to anyone with two braincells to rub together that this is further capiulation to the american fascist pants-shitter in chief. And money. Same thing anyways.

    When do we put zuckyberg through the hague?

  • WesternInfidels@feddit.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    Did you know, if you use uBlock origin, you can add these to your “My Filters” custom filter list:

    ||facebook.com^  
    ||instagram.com^  
    

    And you’ll never accidentally surf to one of those again?

        • Landless2029@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 days ago

          That’s a shame. Businesses gotta market themselves and sadly social media is often used.

          Theres a bbq spot near me with the best ribs/brisket in the area. Standard web menu with ecommerce. With weekly specials on Facebook. I’d never have ordered a brisket bomb sandwich without the FB image.

          If I had to describe that meal in a word. Mouthgasm

          Hate the platform. Not the restaurant.

          • Shawnster_P@thelemmy.club
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 days ago

            I used fetchrss.com to create an RSS feed for my favorite TTRPG store that uses Facebook as their website. I haven’t had a Facebook account in like 15 years, but I can still see when they post something now.

  • pixiribbit@lemmy.worlddeleted by creator
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    facebook has become such a sinister platform. i’ve witnessed several members of my family become radicalized by their algorithms pushing conspiratorial rhetoric. the worst part? they refuse to use anything else. there’s just something about facebook that has them convinced it’s reputable.

  • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    I haven’t been on Facebook in years. And I plan to keep it that way. Last time I was on there it was filled with AI generated content and advertisements and I couldn’t even see my friends posts. What’s the point then?

  • P03 Locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    As shitty as Meta is, I really don’t like the reductive nature of this headline. Here is the original Guardian article:

    https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/sep/21/meta-ban-virginia-woolf-a-room-of-ones-own-barcelona-teatre-raval

    “Meta bans ads for Virginia Woolf play in Spain because they relate to feminism”

    This turned into “Meta Now Banning Ads That Promote Feminism”, with a quote from the showrunner to make it sound even more scary. Frankly, either of them can barely be called journalism, because they can’t be bothered to write more than a page on the subject.

    • velma@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      Look at that. Someone claiming that people are overreacting to this clear censorship of feminism.

      What a surprise.

    • VAK@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      They literally said that “any mention of civil rights, feminism or social reform are usually classified as ‘social topics’ by our automatic system,” and therefore rejected.

      So how the fuck is it reductive?

    • Doomsider@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      I don’t think the headline is reductive at all, in fact, you could take it a step further and say Facefuck has banned all social activism in advertising.

  • BigMacHole@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    Thank GOD! The ONLY Ads I want to see on Meta are Child Porn Apps and Political Ads!

    -Facebook users apparently!

    • Thebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      "Quit shoving your woke agenda down our throats!

      And let me get back to deep-throating all the fascist right-wing propaganda you have!!!"

      • Kristell@herbicide.fallcounty.omg.lol
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 days ago

        The problem is that this isn’t like Microsoft Office > LibreOffice/OnlyOffice/whatever. You’re not on Facebook for Facebook, you’re on Facebook for the people there. It’s why I have a lot of issues getting off of YouTube. I’m not on YouTube because their interface is nice, I’m on YouTube because the people I want to watch don’t post shit elsewhere. It’s a cycle, to get users we need stuff, and for stuff we need creators, and for creators we need users. When it comes to online platforms we don’t need an alternative to YouTube, we need an alternative to Markiplier, which is harder to come up with.

        If you can get your friends, and family onto Friendica that would help quite a bit. The problem is that using a new server is hard for the end user (I would know, all of my fediverse presence is on servers I host), and telling someone “Use Friendica” is like telling someone to “Use email”. Get a Friendica/Mastodon/Whatever server, and keep it in your back pocket. Give them a link to that server, not to Friendica/Mastodon/Whatever as a whole.

        Admittedly I don’t know how hard it is to stop using Facebook because I stopped using Facebook right after they took away the chronological timeline, and stopped using Messenger a few years ago. But spending some time to get a timeline together that you can boost will help any new users you recruit. Crucially, to promote viable alternatives, you need to be part of the viable alternatives, otherwise you’re just someone telling someone to jump into something new with 0 guidance, which is a good way to have them leave.

        • kossa@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 days ago

          to get users we need stuff, and for stuff we need creators, and for creators we need users

          Don’t know. When YouTube started, there were creators, but no users and no way to monetize. Problem is, we are so used to the high production value on YouTube, where people can (and more often than not hope to) make money, so we don’t give the poor production value videos a chance anymore. But we watched that 140p video back then, because there was nothing else and it was interesting.

      • obvs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 days ago

        I stopped using Facebook years ago.

        Before there were viable alternatives.

        The idea that you need Facebook because there aren’t significant alternatives is just not true.

      • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 days ago

        No alternative is viable if no one uses it.

        The network effect is real, and it’s what lets these fascism pushers stay top of mind at all times.

      • Lemmayng@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 days ago

        Facebook to Friendica

        Twitter/Threads to Mastodon/Euclavd

        Instagram to Pixelfed/Vernissage

        Tiktok to Loops

        YouTube to PeerTube

        Anything else?

        • obvs@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 days ago

          Loops

          I wish every content creator would post on both TikTok AND Loops, because Loops could definitely replace TikTok. It has a really solid basis and a lot of potential(although I wish I didn’t have to pause before scrolling off of a video).

          I am really glad to see someone mention Loops, and if I could choose to view someone’s content on Loops instead of TikTok, I would.

          Edit: Oh, and https://loops.video/ if anyone is wondering what we’re talking about.

          • knatschus@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 days ago

            Signal or threema i got both never used WhatsApp ever. There’s also sms, samsung and apple chat which are about as secure as WhatsApp is

            • Talcosis@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              9 days ago

              Now which of those is available worldwide?

              There are parts of the world where you can get online and on Facebook/whatsapp without even having “internet”. If you pay for Internet, you get access to other websites as well.

                • Talcosis@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  9 days ago

                  Some places you get internet, but you’re limited to 3-4 “basic” sites unless you pay for it. Facebook/Whatsapp is often one of those basic sites. Or was.

              • Hawke@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                9 days ago

                Not one of those but XMPP (once upon a time called Jabber) is available worldwide.

                So is Matrix.

      • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 days ago

        The viable alternative is nothing.

        Because no one gives a shit about you (general you, not specific at BitsAndBites), or about what you say. You use it cause you’re addicted to performing for people you dont even talk to or like, because no one can actually maintain hundreds, if not thousands of connections like you collect on facebook, most of whom don’t even give a shit about you. its just a mutual masturbation session, only instead of jerking each others dicks off, your jerking eachother off with pointless likes.

        All social media is, is a means of generating profit from mental illness, and manufacturing mental illness for profit.

        • Drusas@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 days ago

          You use it cause ~you’re addicted to performing for people you dont even talk to or like~ it’s the only place to get and share updates from your extended family

          • Bluescluestoothpaste@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 days ago

            Holy shit send them a text ask them how they’re doing, maybe even a phone call. You don’t have to choose to give mark zuckerberg a monopoly on your family’s stories and memories.

      • AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 days ago

        “Let’s have tacos tonight.” “Nah Im not feeling tacos.” “OK let’s get Chinese food.” “Nah i don’t want Chinese food.” "…ok… let’s make soup. " “Nah I don’t want soup tonight.”

        • undrwater@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 days ago

          This made me thoughtful and laugh at the same time, thank you.

          You’re right, of course. People prefer centralized platforms, and we “nerds” prefer decentralized ones.

          There are no alternatives.

    • adjectivenoun@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      And also Instagram and whatever other Zuck products are in your life. I’m happy they wasted so many billions of dollars setting of virtual Mii meetings lmao…

    • Yerbouti@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      the problem is people are so addicted to it, at least in my province. They don’t want to hear about any alternative that would require the smallest effort. In the 80’s, Dead Kennedys made an album called “Give me convenience or give me death”. I took me decades to realize how accurate this title was for depicting the world we live in.

  • eicker@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    Meta wants to be the global town square, but apparently Virginia Woolf and feminism are too dangerous for its ad system. Meanwhile the company keeps asking us to trust its algorithms with billions of people’s speech. If Meta can’t distinguish feminist literature from prohibited content, maybe it shouldn’t be the internet’s self appointed censor.

    • Riskable@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      If Meta can’t distinguish feminist literature from prohibited content,

      You misunderstand… Feminist literature is the prohibited content. I’m not making a joke here. That’s literally their policy!

  • brsrklf@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    “Stop being political!” say the people running the manufactured hate machine.

  • MrSulu@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    “Women ruin everything” In the olden days it was so much better. Women! Know your place!

    • JelleWho@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      There place is right beside anyone else, anyone is just another humon. And most of them already know it, it mostly the other side that does not want to accept this it seems?

      • MrSulu@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 days ago

        Just in case, my comment was harsh satire. Not the rantings of one of those morons.

    • Allero@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      Upvote to recognize the obvious satire

      Downvote if you didn’t and take this literally