• Smaile@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    Sounds like they want people board and mad, a historically winning combination.

  • ErevanDB@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    Well, time to protest, and if need be, use the constitution how it was intended.

      • Burninator05@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 days ago

        I think the intent of the law is that it wouldn’t mater. If the VPN blocks the site, you can’t get to the site.

          • peopleproblems@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 days ago

            It wouldn’t, which is why I roll my eyes every time I see a bill demanding what a VPN must do.

            The only way for them to actually enforce this through VPNs is to block VPNs. Which, presumably, they’ll do at some point, but with an exception list for companies paying the right license fee to use a Government Approved VPN.

            Which, obviously, will be full of security flaws, and likely won’t be HIPPA compliant or other compliances etc, etc.

        • obvs@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 days ago

          I don’t know if you’re familiar with how VPNs work, but it’s basically like a computer in the other country is sharing its internet connection with you.

          So let’s imagine that things are reversed, and you’re a VPN provider in the United States and you’re sharing your internet connection with some computers in another country, like Saudi Arabia, for example.

          And just to be clear, you conduct no business in Saudi Arabia. You’re just sharing your internet connection with people from there. You don’t have any associates in Saudi Arabia, and you have no intention of ever going to Saudi Arabia.

          And let’s say that Saudi Arabia passed a law that said VPN providers had to block some kind of content, like maybe banning all access to content about your favorite band.

          How is this going to affect the VPN service you provide to the other computers?

    • frongt@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      This doesn’t stem from a lack of understanding. It’s about corporations and control.

      • 4am@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 days ago

        We need to stop believing the boomer’s framing that they’re all old and dumb, and start realizing that they’d eat us if we tasted good

            • Geth@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              8 days ago

              The difference is we pretend to be better than then, we know better and can usually do something about it.

                • yeahiknow3@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  8 days ago

                  The thing that would make us better isn’t knowing; it’s doing. It makes sense to say that someone who knows better but behaves no better is literally no better.

                  Rationality is sensitivity and responsiveness to reasons, and plenty of folks are unresponsive to normative facts.

                  At least 70% of humans are just dangerously intelligent animals. Like imagine a polar bear that can drive and trade stocks. That’s the average person.

    • verdigris@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      No, we’re at the point where the people pushing these laws do understand how the Internet works, and they want to control all of it.

    • aim4harmony@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      NextDNS is good and I just realised that it’s based in The US. The alternative ones don’t seem to provide the feature of granular filtering.

        • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 days ago

          i think you have to set up DoH with unbound to make it not be in cleartext? I dunno honestly I’m a dummy, but I’m fairly sure that it’s pretty tricky to get it totally secured. I guess I don’t understand why you can’t use ubound recursively but have its root.hints pointing as something like quad9 instead of all the actual root authoritative dns servers, theres like 13 of them and more than half are the US government.

      • CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 days ago

        TIL expressVPN started as

        Crossrider started off by making a SDK for the deployment of browser extensions platforms with support for monetizing extensions. The monetization options were used by major [ad injectors which used man-in-the-browser to change or add advertisements to what users saw.

        JFC.

        • Übercomplicated@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 days ago

          Proton, mullvad, air VPN, depending on threat case. NordVPN for torrenting specifically, but not as good for privacy etc.

          The most important thing is to check who owns the VPN (as the previous commentor said, stay away from Kape tech) and where it’s based (e.g., 14 eyes), as well as independent security audits and the company’s public history with government requests.

        • NekoKoneko@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 days ago

          Mullvad is zero log and located in Sweden, and accepts payment in crypto to reduce traceable privacy footprint (which frankly is one of the real, relevant use-cases for crypto to further legitimate privacy needs).

        • iamthetot@piefed.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 days ago

          Proton has been good for me. CEO seems like a dick but I’m gonna be honest it’s getting pretty hard to support any tech company that doesn’t have a dick CEO.

          • No1@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 days ago

            I had trouble with IVPN. They didn’t have many countries/servers, and ended up being blocked.

            Currently on ProtonVPN, and seems to be OK so far.

  • rafoix@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    If piracy was a problem I can find them multiple international corporations that are well know for using copyrighted content to train their LLM without paying for it or having permission from the owner of that content.

    • mechoman444@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      This is a special kind of irony: someone is lambasting one group for piracy while simultaneously advocating for another group to do essentially the same thing for their own benefit.

      They’re not really prosecuting people for piracy, so why would they go after large corporations?

      I’m not supporting the idea of pirating data for LLM training. I’m just saying: don’t be a hypocrite simply because a group of people you dislike is doing the same thing you’re doing, for the same reasons.

      • NotSteve_@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        They’re not really prosecuting people for piracy, so why would they go after large corporations?

        One group is poor individuals and the other is a billion/trillion dollar industry that’s basically gloating about pirating at an industrial scale.

        Going after individuals for downloading a 4Gb rip of a movie doesn’t make any financial sense but it makes a lot more sense going after companies downloadinh millions of gigabytes and have more than enough money to pay damages

        So it’s strange to continue attacking individuals while covering your eyes at the big companies

        • mechoman444@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 days ago

          I’m not attacking anyone, and I’m not covering my eyes to anything.

          You basically just proved my point: going after every individual or corporation that pirates isn’t really feasible.

          I’m simply pointing out the hypocrisy in the stance itself. It doesn’t matter who’s doing the pirating; the underlying justification is the same. If it’s acceptable for an individual to pirate something because the company no longer sells it, then you can’t suddenly declare that same reasoning unacceptable when a corporation does it for essentially the same reason.

          You don’t get to have your cake and eat it too. Either you apply the same standards of criticism and ridicule to individuals and corporations, or your argument doesn’t hold water.

          You’re either okay with piracy as a principle, or you’re not. You don’t get to create one standard for individuals and another for corporations simply because you prefer one of them.

          • NotSteve_@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 days ago

            Either you apply the same standards of criticism and ridicule to individuals and corporations, or your argument doesn’t hold water.

            That’s exactly what I’m doing though. Imagine standing there with a bullhorn shouting that you just downloaded every available movie, show, research paper, news article, etc and you’re now profiting significantly off of it, as an individual. You’d get sued into oblivion if you weren’t sent to prison first.

            I still think pirating is okay and that the US twisting the world’s arm to enforce the DMCA is fucking BS but if we have to suffer with it then the billion dollar companies should have to too

  • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    Darrell Issa out of California appears to have proposed this, I assume because he is not seeking re-election.

    Who wants to take a bet he is getting paid for it?

    • vinnymac@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      He is getting paid. Not only has the Motion Picture Association contributed to political campaigns but it very recently gave awards and money to two politicians that promote their interests

      For specifics on donations see: https://myreptracker.com/campaign-finance/committees/C00139519/motion-picture-association-inc-political-action-committee-mpaamerica-pac

      In 2025, the MPA gave Chris Coons its Industry Champion Award and also honored Darrell Issa. MPA CEO Charles Rivkin described Coons as a “trusted partner” and praised Issa as a “true partner” on matters important to film and television.

      It’s very basic corruption in broad daylight, and it’s pretty common in US politics today. As far as I know, you can’t prove corruption in court without some form of wiretapping or paper trail, which is trivial for them to avoid. So they’ll never get in trouble for being absolute utter dog shit human beings.

  • Pratai@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    Meh… I don’t pirate anthing, so… non-issue from where I stand. Though I can see how this would upset a lot of people.

      • Pratai@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        The regime doesn’t need this buffoonery to ban freedom of speech. They’re already trying that shit regardless of piracy.

          • Pratai@piefed.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 days ago

            What other weapon? I already said I don’t pirate anything. This is a harmless weapon to use against me.

            • muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              8 days ago

              I feel like you are so dumb you would drown in the rain by staring up at the sky I literally just gave an example that would affect you.

              • Pratai@piefed.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                8 days ago

                That you resort to ad hominem when people disagree with you shows you aren’t mature enough to discuss this in any meaningful way.

                Also- it shows that I won’t be missing anthing when I block your immature ass.

            • bravemonkey@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              8 days ago

              Great, no concern to anyone then because it doesn’t affect you personally. Why did you even reply?

  • Agent641@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    My ISP wondering why I only ever access 5 servers in Switzerland, Sweden, Denmark, Belgium and Finland

  • DeadEndLink@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    All new media (other than documentaries) are meaningless. AI slop, propaganda, white washing or ego porn.

    • IAmYouButYouDontKnowYet@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      It really is. The same open world games, the same sitcoms and movies, the same soulless music. None of it has any soul anymore, it’s not even actual expression or art…

    • frongt@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      If you think documentaries can’t be propaganda, I have an excellent bridge for sale