• Gammelfisch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    What about Axon and Motorola Solutions? There are several more that involved in surveillance activities.

    • crypt0cler1c@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      This guy runs one of the biggest surveillance tech companies in 2026. Trust me when I say this guy is keenly aware of his personal privacy.

    • Avicenna@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      Some states (Florida, Texas) have actually stopped or scaled back using these cameras because of the bad publicity the company got from all the backlash. So yeah, it might actually show him.

  • stinkytofuisgood@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Lmao judging by those photos he filed a request to blur his property on Google street view. How incredibly ironic.

    However I’m sure there are many photos of the street with the public toilet elsewhere if you want to see it in all its shit-covered glory.

  • Yerbouti@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Again, the American way of doing things

    This is just a dirty capitalist business doing shit. The problem of mass surveillance is much deeper than that. Shooting the CEO won’t fix anything just like shooting the CEO of healthcare insurance business didn’t magically gave you all healthcare.

    Google kbows more about you than you mom and any camera business will ever do, and yet 98% of Americans are happy to give them their fingerprints, location, heart rate, emails, contacts, etc.

    There’s this saying in French, When the wise points at the moon, the fool looks at the finger.

  • pluge@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    We NEED to put this kind of pressure on all ALPR companies. I don’t mean to take the foot off the gas with Flock, but I’m so afraid that Axon and Motorola and others will swoop in once Flock is gone, and everyone will be done with/tired of this particular public fight.

    • littlewonder@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      But also put that pressure on your local city councils (and other state and local government entities) that keep perpetuating this surveillance.

      They are often the ones signing on the dotted line for these contracts at the insistence of their ostensibly subordinate law enforcement.

      • FlexibleToast@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        This sort of data collection by private companies should just straight up be illegal. If they’re not beholden to the bill of rights, I don’t want them maintaining this sort of data.

    • Yerbouti@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      What about, let’s say Google? They have much more personal informations about you than a camera will ever provide. They basically have the location data of 75% of Americans at any minutes. Why don’t you start by putting pressure on them?

      • EvilHankVenture@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        That is opt-in. Doesn’t make it ethical but it is a much different question. I can always leave my phone at home but I can’t opt out of Flock cameras.

        • Yerbouti@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          I mean yeah, you could also not have a phone at that point.

          I could argue that you can cover your face or stay home if you don’t want to be filmed in public.

          To be clear, I despise Flock but it’s just a camera business. You have much bigger problem than that and shooting the CEO wont magically fix anything. Where do they get the database to identify people? Focusing on Flock while GAFAM gets your fingerprints, emails, locations, contacts, heart rate, etc. is just… not a good strategy. Mass surveillance goes way beyond camera and Flock is just a business, they will get replace by another one if you don’t fix the problem at it’s source.

    • anon_8675309@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      Be careful with extreme language. There are reasonable uses for ALPR. They’re used to read dot and hazmat markings (placards) on trucks for example. This keeps you safe as well as gets products to destinations more efficiently and quickly.

      • flandish@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        nope. not reasonable. we have dot plac readability for decades with our eyes. you’re attempting to say “alpr notices a hazmat with a 1 dot placard where explosives(1.x) are not allowed and the cops and deep get dispatched”?

        that’s been a thing for years. by cops manually patrol monitoring and doing their jobs.

          • flandish@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 days ago

            i mean … i only speak as a person who responds to these incidends and am aware of how the current system works and where it fails.

            giving up my freedoms so a corporation can profit does not seem like a healthy way to go about fixing a problem that’s not really a problem. (your hazmat example)

            why are you simping for corporations?

            • anon_8675309@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 days ago

              It’s not simping for corporations when you understand that some automation is very helpful both in efficiencies as well as safety. We’re not getting away from diesel anytime soon, no matter what Lemmy believes. So, why wasted it having them idle in a huge line while someone manually does something that can otherwise be done in a fraction of a second? Seriously, don’t be so damned naive.

              Everything you do and everywhere you go, you’re leaving data where, if someone wanted to, they could gather all that up and profile you. You would have to go back to the stone ages for this not to be the case. Technology isn’t the issue. Automation isn’t the issue. The issue is humans. You tackle this issue by holding them responsible when they do bad things with good technology.

  • brem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    It was hard to tell because everything was so blurry, but I thought it was a reasonable place to poop.