If they could draw or make music, they wouldn’t need a robot to do it, and they clearly want to but don’t have the skills.

  • agent_nycto@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    That would be a good thing? You don’t want a challenge or to grow? Develop a skill? You don’t get a sense of accomplishment if you just have a computer steal other people’s effort for you.

    • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      What? I want the computer to help me make the art I have in my head. How is that stealing? I want to say more crescendo, or make the low line lower. Or have me hum something and it write it. Then combine it with something else I hummed.
      And I have plenty of areas to be challenged, and to develop. But only 24 hours in a day. I can’t be an expert in everything. But that doesn’t mean I couldn’t enjoy a greater variety of things if I had help.

        • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 days ago

          Same way other artist learn how to make art. By looking at other artists works and using them for inspiration. But I already said that. You just ignored it because you thought your reply was a mic drop. It’s not.

            • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 days ago

              You just going to claim that, or you going to back it up. I have experience with AI development, but not specifically image stuff. So it could be done differently, but if it is trained the same way as the other AIs, it is in fact how it works.

              • agent_nycto@lemmy.worldOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                3 days ago

                Inspiration is not the same thing as turning pictures into static, turning static into numbers, then taking someone’s text and turning it into numbers and using those numbers to generate more static that gets translated into an image. Looking at a painting isn’t the same thing as plagiarism, and even with inspiration there is choice in its execution. With ai slop there is no choice in execution, from the computer nor the user.

                Don’t anthropomorphize the pollution making job killing surveillance machine.

                • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  Well whatever. You don’t really care, you just want to hate anything about AI. Your last two sentences show that clearly. If it makes you happy go ahead. Some of us use it to make our lives better. So we will carry on.

                  • agent_nycto@lemmy.worldOP
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    2 days ago

                    You’re actively making everyone’s lives worse by using it. If it was a simple dislike of something that was harmless, that would be one thing, live and let live.

                    But it’s doing irreparable harm to our environment, to our communities, to our arts, to our jobs, to truth, and our minds.

                    You think you’re making your life better but you’re really just taking a shortcut because you don’t want to put in the work to get better.

                    Your attitude is disgusting and selfish.

        • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 days ago

          A person can take one of those predrawn things on a peice of paper. Then fill it in with colors of their own choice. Another person starting from the same peice of paper can do the same. Odds are they won’t choose the same colors. So each finished product is different. The people didn’t make the outline, but they still made the finished product. And it can still bring them joy. Nothing wrong with that. Many artists have seen lots of art they didn’t create. Especially those who study art. That is one way to learn. They then take all that knowledge and make their own art.
          A person can use AI to just “trace”, but they could also use it to truely create what they see in their mind, which would certainly be making something.

          • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 days ago

            Tracing can bring people joy, but, it’s not the same. You’re cheating yourself out of an experience. You’ll never be as proud of anything your AI agent makes as a real artist will be proud of their own work, because you didn’t make it.

            Or, to put it another way: you ordered a sandwich at Subway. You told the worker just how you like it, picked all the toppings, etc. Eating the sandwich might bring you joy, even! But, did you make a sandwich? Obviously not.