• alterforlett @lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 days ago

    So they asked beforehand if there was space for them, and they were told it was not. They were told by the police to exit the highway, and they did not.

    Unless there’s more to the story than what the article says, this is some seriously entitled behaviour

    • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      5 days ago

      They’re literally ‘entitled’ to use Swiss roads. You don’t need to ask police permission to drive somewhere. If they thought the caravan was going to park somewhere illegally, they could intervene then once an actual crime has been committed.

      But none of this is about actual crime. It’s just NIMBY racism.

    • Humanius@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      The article does say that it was the local council that wanted to prevent them from moving there.

      I’m not saying there definitely is a discriminatory motive… I do not know how the people of Switzerland look at the Romani people.
      But given the way Roma are treated in much of Europe, and Switzerland’s reputation for being somewhat conservative, I am not discounting the possibility that they are being discriminated against here.

      The equivalent in the US would be if a couple of families of black people wanted to move to a predominantly white town in the south, and the county would step in claiming there are no more homes available.

  • dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    5 days ago

    By “traveling community” and “travelers”, does the article author actually mean Romani (“gypsies”)?

    I ask since the article may have lost something in translation. It also puts the police’s actions in a different light if true.

    • Humanius@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      “Travelers” does generally refer to the Romani and Sinti people who live a nomadic lifestyle.

      The French version of the article uses the phrase “les gens du voyage”, which according to the French Wikipedia page is often used to refer to the “Roma of France (including the Sinti and the Gitanos)”.

      So I think it’s fairly safe to assume that that is what they mean with “travelers” in this article.

      • justgohomealready@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        5 days ago

        But they travel on what seem to be modern and perfectly white and clean caravans? These must not be the same kind of travellers we have where I live.

  • CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    I’m not sure how it works in Switzerland but in the UK I believe the government is required to provide some legal settlement sites as a form of cultural preservation, many municipalities don’t of course which results in illegal settlements. I know a lot of people dislike travellers but the issue always seemed to be an artifical one and classic example of creating an issue in order to take advantage of the outrage.