• nialv7@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Is TikTok really harming children, or is this just our generation’s “television/internet/video games are bad for children”?

      • dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        social media just needs http requests to exist, how does pre web 2.0 fix things honestly. gui apps have existed since windows 95 or even earlier, how is the tiktok app technically different than the space cadet paddle game with added network functionality?

        • Oggyb@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          Web 2.0 is the umbrella term for a bunch of things that enabled the social media we see today. Infinite scroll, notification toasts and asynchronous loading of new content to name a few.

          If we had to reload a page every time we wanted new content we would see way less and move on more quickly.

          • AutistoMephisto@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            To add to this, Web 1.0 was also known as the “read-only” Web. Webpages were managed by their owners and those owners decided what visitors saw. Those visitors also did not have the ability to add their own content to the pages. They might have had the ability to comment, or to make posts on BBS sites, but they couldn’t just submit anything. Then in 2004, it changed. We transitioned to Web 2.0. All the things you mention allowed visitors of webpages to actively submit content to those pages, and soon it became known as the “read-write” Web.

    • Rooster326@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I wouldn’t say nothing happened. Young people migrated off of it and it’s now the lead gasoline of the social media world

      • gustofwind@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Yeah but young people didn’t migrate off it because it was harmful

        They migrated in part to instagram which Facebook bought and made even more harmful than Facebook itself

    • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      nothing happened

      Nah, the perpetrators continues to make endless money, etc. Lots of capitalist stuff has been happening.

  • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Interesting that as soon as China loses control of it, we get stories about how it’s so bad for you. News flash, it’s always been bad for you. It and all the others like it are one of the major reasons the world is the way it is today.

    • kuhli@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      This didn’t change after china lost control of it, there’ve always been a bunch of stories about how it’s bad for you

    • hereiamagain@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I’ve never installed tiktok. And I got rid of Instagram years before shorts. Additionally, while I enjoy long form YouTube videos from non-brainrot creators, I haven’t used the official app in years, so I avoid shorts there as well.

      I’m not bragging, it’s just relevant to my next statement:

      I too feel like my content consumption isn’t long enough. I think the instant gratification of moving to the next thing minutes after the first is bad for our brains.

      In the last couple of months I have started reading again. Audiobooks mostly, and I know it’s not the same, but it engages my brain while driving for work.

      Additionally, in the last few weeks, I’ve changed our TV habits. We usually watch 2 or 3 hours of TV in the evenings, which is probably too long by some metrics but I’m not ready to cut back yet, personally. What I have done, however, is stop binging.

      Normally we pick two, maybe three at most, shows we want to watch. Then we burn through them, episode after episode. Churning through the seasons until they’re either gone or we’re caught up with it’s production.

      Lately, I’ve done the opposite. We watch one episode of a show we like. Only one. We can watch one of another show if we want. But thus far we haven’t added more shows to the rotation, hard to keep track, might negate benefits, IDK.

      When we’ve watched one episode of one or two shows. We either change gears and stop watching TV, or watch a movie.

      By that time, the time for TV is more of less over.

      Already I’m seeing benefits, small, but I’m happy. The next day, in my idle thoughts, I’ll find myself thinking about what happened in the show, and making connections and predictions that I otherwise wouldn’t have made. I enjoy this.

      Plus we have a backlog of movies, we’re really bad about dedicating time to movies, even though we’d gladly waste that time watching several episodes in a row of a show 🤦‍♂️ So I’m glad to be getting into some good movies too.

      • pkjqpg1h@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        we’re really bad about dedicating time to movies

        I should start watching movies instead of TV-shows. I used to binge-watch and it feels unsatisfying

      • mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Audiobooks mostly, and I know it’s not the same

        FWIW, studies have found that reading and speech activate different language regions of the brain… But oddly enough, audiobooks activate the reading parts of the brain, not just the speech parts. So it may be more similar than you’d initially think.

        I finally got my AudioBookShelf instance up and running last year, around March. In those remaining 7 months, I “read” (listened to) over 50 books. I used to be a voracious reader as a child. But at some point I lost the spark, as finding time to read got harder and harder. Audiobooks have reignited that love for reading, in a way I can’t even put into words.

        I find myself looking forward to my daily commute, because it means I can listen to another two or three chapters in the car. I’ve even started taking the longer route home (which is technically more fuel efficient, but adds like 10 minutes to my commute) because I don’t mind the extra time in the car. I find myself wanting to wash the dishes or fold the laundry, because I can have my earbuds in while I work.

        I still doomscroll on YouTube shorts or Instagram reels occasionally, but that doesn’t mean I have to give up long form content like reading. They fill two entirely separate niches.

  • flango@lemmy.eco.br
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    KY P.40, PARA 125 [REDACTED BUT RETRIEVABLE TEXT]

    The ‘TikTank’ [internal TikTok group studying issues affecting TikTok] Report observed that “Tiktok is particularly popular with younger users who are particularly sensitive to reinforcement in the form of social reward and have minimal ability to self-regulate effectively.”

    Well, they are targeting young users because it’s a biological fact that they can’t control themselves very well, meaning that their brains are not fully developed yet. This is like making profits from people with diabetes by selling expensive insulin; if they don’t get it, they die.

    TikTok should answer legally by its actions, as well as other industries.

    • FalschgeldFurkan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      This is like making profits from people with diabetes by selling expensive insulin; if they don’t get it, they die.

      More like taking advantage of a drunk person, but I agree. Still a shitty thing to do.

  • Virtvirt588@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Children are not the only ones being harmed here. This selective focus is only going to destroy the perception of other groups in terms of harm. Teenagers, young people, old people are also being harmed here - it is by design, and its everyone.

    • Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      I bet this is related to Palantir facial recognition. Seems like identifying people and feeding it into some database is very important lately.

      • ilovepiracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Always has been. You’ve been fingerprinted on the web for 10 years minimum. You know those secret aliases you had? Yeah they always knew they were you.

        • Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          Stop. I’m not fucking playing this stupid game. I’m well aware of data brokers and selling our data. This is clearly different uploading pictures of yourself with id as a requirement to access websites.

          If she had wheels she’d be a bike

            • Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 months ago

              That’s how they want to verify underage kids. You need to upload photo proof of your ID. I don’t think it’s a coincidence that agencies like ICE are also taking everyone’s pictures to upload to Palantir database.

  • utopiah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Damn… money laundering though LIVE with its “gifts” I never thought about this. Everything else is wrong, at scale, but this surprised me.

    • wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      If you watch a decent amount of twitch streaming it’s pretty obvious. I’m sure there are a ton of whales out there willing to dump >$1000 in one go on a streamer, but just watch something like a “subathon”, or a “hype train”. You’ll see more dollars than viewers they have move around in the span of like 30 minutes.

      Or when streamers “bet” each other large amounts of gift subscriptions. That’s explicitly money, and abstracting it behind subs only masks how damn much a lot of these “bets” are really for.

      I’m not going to claim that anywhere near all of it is straight laundering, but it’s pretty damn obvious just how fucking easy it would be to use it all for washing/tumbling of dirty funds.

  • Kkk2237pl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Not only tiktok. My parents are addicted to facebook stories and YouTube stories ;)

    The same algorithm…

    What is more there a lot of Russian propaganda and misinformation. But in Poland that’s common in social media

    • Loui@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Same in Germany. 😒 Why can’t we cut off Russia from our networks or do anything to counter them.

      I feel like we are sleepwalking into a disaster.

      People need to understand that we are at war and treat Russia as the enemy.

      It doesn’t matter that there is little hard proof Putin, his secret service or who ever is behind this. When EVERYTHING points to their direction then you have to act.

      We make them bigger than they have to be by ‘playing fair’ when they stopped doing that decades ago or never even did themselves. This is entirely an advantage we can take from them.

      Although I admit it’s much harder for an open, democratic society to agree to play ‘unfair’ like the enemy. But maybe there is another way? Don’t compromise your ideals but bring pro western propaganda to Russian minds.

      They don’t respect our cyber sovereignty for lack of a better word. Why should we respect theirs.

      Other countries do this as well and we need to build our defences or otherwise we will be the punching bag for others.

  • minorkeys@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Oh look, another company that knows it’s harming people and society, hides it and keeps on chasing profit and power.

      • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Yeah that’s because they have a state sanctioned version of TikTok that is controlled by an algorithm that police’s peoples speech and what they do and reports anything untoward to the proper authorities.

        And now that Fox News has bought TikTok, the US has their own version of an algorithm that will police people’s speech and what they do, and most likely report anything untoward to the proper authorities.