• vane@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    1 month ago

    I’m a Barbie girl, in the Barbie world
    Life in plastic, it’s fantastic

  • slaacaa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    So what? We all have to make a bit of sacrifice to maximize shareholder value. Stop whining about it!

    Tap for spoiler

    /s

  • asteriskeverything@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    1 month ago

    The researchers speculate that microplastics could contribute to neurological conditions by obstructing blood flow, interfering with neural connections, or triggering inflammation in the brain.

    A whole generation dumbed down by lead and now microplastics. We fucked

    • HasturInYellow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      This is just one more apocalypse to add to the pile. We are no more fucked that before we knew about this. Humanity can only die once.

      Still, kinda shit, eh?

      • Suite404@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        The shitty part is it won’t just be us. Animals who had nothing to do with our shit will likely die right along with us.

        • HasturInYellow@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Absolutely. I was just talking about my daily life. I don’t give a shit if something gives me cancer or sterilizes me at this point. My body is so irrevocably fucked by pollution already, unless it kills me/debilitates me within the next 10 years, I don’t care. A shortening life span is meaningless to me.

  • WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 month ago

    This is why I do the following once per fortnight:

    1. Obtain 1 liter of pharmaceutical-grade acetone.
    2. Heat the acetone to 150C to sterilize it.
    3. Cover the acetone with a sterile cover and let it cool to room temperature.
    4. While the acetone is cooling, drill a small hole in skull with a heat-sterilized drill bit. (Or re-use previously drilled skull port.)
    5. Once cooled, using a large syringe, inject 1 liter of sterile acetone directly into skull.
    6. Shake head around for 2 minutes, let sit for 30 minutes.
    7. After 30 minutes, attach new sterile needle to syringe and insert into skull port.
    8. Withdraw 1 liter of fluid from skull.

    Acetone will dissolve the microplastics inside your brain. Afterwards, the resulting solution can simply be syringed out and discarded. Alternately, the resulting solution can be recycled as an effective paint thinner.

    /s (This WOULD remove microplastics from your brain, but it would also mean you wouldn’t have to worry about microplastics at all, on the account of simply being dead.)

    • peteyestee@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      For real. And now I feel like people are either extremely stupid or just monsters for having kids.

      Humanity is wasted. Its wild that I think I might actually favor a humanity ending natural disaster over continuing whatever the fuck humans are doing now.

      • markko@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        Edgy…

        Despite having no desire to have kids, I’d much rather be born today than pretty much any time before the last few generations.

        • Suite404@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          That really depends on where you were born and what status you were born into. You could be born into a lot of places today that you would starve or live under miserable conditions.

        • peteyestee@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          That’s the point I’m making, it’s not about YOU, you are not the child being born. Your opinion doesn’t matter to the kid being born.

          • markko@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            What? I’m saying that if I was the kid being born I would rather be born today than in the 1500s.

  • Zacryon@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 month ago

    He believes that food, especially meat, is the primary source of microplastics entering the body, as commercial meat production tends to accumulate plastic particles within the food chain.

    “The way we irrigate fields with plastic-contaminated water, we postulate that the plastics build up there,” Campen said. “We feed those crops to our livestock. We take the manure and put it back on the field, so there may be a sort of feed-forward biomagnification.”

    Go vegan, I guess?

    • Jazsta@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yes, and:

      “Bottled water alone can expose people to nearly as many microplastic particles annually as all ingested and inhaled sources combined,” said Brandon Luu, an Internal Medicine Resident at the University of Toronto. “Switching to tap water could reduce this exposure by almost 90%, making it one of the simplest ways to cut down on microplastic intake.”

  • Lucky_777@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 month ago

    Plastic has been the best and worst invention in human existence. We need a replacement for this asap.

    • gressen@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      1 month ago

      We should start by subsidizing plant based materials instead of oil based. We’re literary paying extra to make more plastic.

  • ssillyssadass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    I am longing for plastic-eating bacteria to be released into the wild. There are other materials we can use.

    • JayleneSlide@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 month ago

      The medical field would be categorically fuct. Just the loss of sterile packaging would have serious consequences. Minimally invasive surgeries, joint replacements, bandages that don’t adhere to wounds, stents…

      Then let’s consider cordage. Mountain climbing, arborists, rescue teams, sailboats (the most efficient way to cross oceans), ships, construction… the loss of just Dyneema/UHMWPE, which is a relatively new entrant to the cordage field would have seriously negative impacts.

      There is a lot of energy bound up in those long molecules, and there are no unexploited niches in balanced ecosystems. There are already bacteria that can consume certain polymers under narrow conditions. Humanity is gonna be so screwed for a long time if bacteria can slip those narrow parameters.

    • Halosheep@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 month ago

      Think of how many things around you are made of plastic. What about critical pieces of things like airplanes? What would you replace that with to prevent the bacteria from causing damage to them?

      I could probably pick a few things on my desk right now that would be much more difficult and much more costly to produce with other materials.

    • nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Yes, I am sure such a bacteria being released at this scale would have absolutely zero negative consequences

    • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      I would like for you to meet my friend, the oyster mushroom. I’m wondering what level of soil accumulation we need to support massive, city-wide oyster mushroom blooms

    • tree_frog@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      There are plastic eating microorganisms, both fungi, and bacteria.

      But, they take a long time to break down plastic. I’ve had a fungus that can digest plastic in a mushroom cultivation bag for nine months and only one specimen has made it through so far.

      I imagine splicing the gene that allows for the production of this enzyme into an ocean bound microorganism would clean up a lot of it while not affecting most of our terristrial infrastructure.

      Of course, folks put plastic tubing and what not in the ocean too, so I guess we’ll all have to die instead.

    • Tryenjer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      We first need a way to use them to consume plastic in a controlled manner. There are things that simply would not be possible without these polymers and that we do not want destroyed.

  • Sgarcnl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 month ago

    At 600 degrees, there is probably some reaction happening there that may be similar to plastics. Basically, creating brain plastic and cooking it off to measure plastics. Im a bit skeptic.