We have decided some brain quirks are disorders (and get accommodations, as is compassionate), whilst others are flaws (and get slurs). But no one picks their hardware. You cannot earn a better prefrontal cortex or deserve a calmer amygdala. Nor does one get to pick the environment they are born in, which will inform their choices later in life. Even the capacity to “learn better” is a roll of the dice, some brains start the race with sprinting shoes, others with lead weights.
So when we call someone stupid, lazy or insane we are not describing a choice, but simply announcing which kinds of unlucky we’ve decided are worthy of scorn.
Ah yes, you claiming to be Jesus in this scenario really showed me lmao. Couldn’t have possibly hoped for more validation than this link.
Dude.
You are literally arguing for the right to be mean to others without consequences.
Not in the least. I’m arguing that this user is full of false assumptions. Just because I admit that insults will always remain a thing doesn’t mean they’re beyond reproach.
I have to assume from your comment that you also think mean words are “carnage” 😬
You realize the OP is doing a melodramatic bit, right? It’s funny, at least to me.
You say that they are full of false assumptions but your arguments against them hinge on the assumption that they have been asking for banning for words. Can you point to a single instance where he says this?
If they’re trolling and you like it, good for you?
I deleted all my comments here because this is a STUPID fucking conversation. I won’t respond to further trollings.