NomNom@feddit.ukBanned to

Europe@feddit.orgEnglish · 4 months ago

The Luxembourg paradox: A record number of working poor in the EU’s wealthiest country

english.elpais.com

9

1

The Luxembourg paradox: A record number of working poor in the EU’s wealthiest country

english.elpais.com

NomNom@feddit.ukBanned to

Europe@feddit.orgEnglish · 4 months ago

9

The contrast between the high cost of living and housing and the difficulties faced by part of the population puts a strain on the social model of the small Central European state

Chat

ironblossom@feddit.org
link
fedilink
English
arrow-up
0·
4 months ago
At least give one concrete example of such tax schemes, and it better be illegal
- definitely_AI@feddit.online
  link
  fedilink
  English
  arrow-up
  0·
  4 months ago
  The whole point of tax havens is that they ARE legal. According to their nation’s specific laws. Luxembourg features heavily in the Panama Papers.
  
  https://ordnur.com/business/luxembourg-is-the-ultimate-tax-haven/
  
  And these leaks:
  
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LuxLeaks
  
  This was a MASSIVE scandal back in… 2010-ish?
  - ironblossom@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0·
    4 months ago
    Thanks for that

Europe@feddit.org

europe@feddit.org

You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !europe@feddit.org

News and information from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don’t overly distort the content.
No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don’t post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don’t troll nor incite hatred. Don’t look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia’s List of fallacies.
No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don’t question the statehood of Israel.
Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add “/s” when you’re being sarcastic (and don’t use it to break rule no. 3).
If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
Don’t evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
Always provide context with posts: Don’t post uncontextualized images or videos, and don’t start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

on any topic: Al Mayadeen, brusselssignal:eu, citjourno:com, europesays:com, Breitbart, Daily Caller, Fox, GB News, geo-trends:eu, news-pravda:com, OAN, RT, sociable:co, any AI slop sites (when in doubt please look for a credible imprint/about page), change:org (for privacy reasons), archive:is,ph,today (their JS DDoS websites)
on Middle-East topics: Al Jazeera
on Hungary: Euronews

Unless they’re the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any “thinktank” type organization, and non-Lemmy social media (incl. Substack). Don’t link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don’t show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the admin that applied the rule (check modlog first to find who was it.)

Visibility: Public

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

139 users / day
441 users / week
1.2K users / month
4.62K users / 6 months
0 local subscribers
11.4K subscribers
3.22K Posts
24.7K Comments
Modlog