• Lfrith@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    118
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    GTA online is the worst thing to happen to the series, since it killed off story DLCs. Which were a fantastic way to get new story based content for their games between the years long wait between sequels. Damn those gamers and their obsession with buying microtransactions.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      4 days ago

      Then they double killed it when they started introducing nonsense like flying cars with rocket launchers.

        • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          3 days ago

          worse, they disabled it. it worked perfectly on proton then they blocked it off.

    • real_squids@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      5 days ago

      On the flip side, it’s given it insane longevity and made it feel more modern. Playing singleplayer feels so annoying at times because of their arbitrary rules (which are still in online, but toned down a little) and gameplay/mission design.

      At least GTAO showed everyone rockstar’s true nature, and you couldn’t turn away or say that it’s a small alternative game mode.
      So shoutout to online and 5 as a whole for showing me enough to avoid all future rockstar titles lol

      • tootoughtoremember@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        4 days ago

        GTA5 was released in 2013. GTA6 is being released 13 years later. If there had been no GTAO, we would have had at least one or two more “modern” GTA releases in that window.

        • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          I would think so.
          Considering for how detailed the world is, I can see them working for a long time on it (maybe not 13 years but longer than between 4 and 5).

        • real_squids@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          4 days ago

          I wouldn’t be so sure. Modern AAA games are insanely big and resource-intensive. Just look at rdr2

          • Lfrith@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            4 days ago

            We would have had story DLC like Ballad of Gay Tony and the Lost and the Damned GTA IV got as well as Undead Nightmare for Red Dead Redemption.

          • Lightor@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            They want money though, they would be selling content instead of shark passes or whatever.

    • lechekaflan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      Unfortunately, the online component easily becomes a profitable sideline. Sarcastically, it’s what keeps some game corporation CEOs afford their lifestyles.

      • madcaesar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        I fucking hate how there is starvation and homelessness in the world, at the same time as there is morons blasting cash away into imaginary online points.

  • heyWhatsay@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 days ago

    I’m already boycotting rockstar, just make offline games and stop with the invasive bs

    Now my money is going to indie developers

  • aesthelete@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    With the reputation most companies have with leaking and breached data, who wouldn’t want to have their ssn and license on file with rock star games?!

    • BeliefPropagator@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      maybe the goal is instead to try to get ahead of regulation by implementing a system that is easily bypassed by most kids (like these video based age estimations). Then they can show this to the regulator and be like: “look were already doing everything we can, no need to actually put the regulation in place”.

  • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    4 days ago

    If they roll this out to my country, I’m just not buying any of their games. My privacy is worth a lot more than that.

    I might still play them, I just won’t buy them, because I’m not doing age verification.

    • seralth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      It’s M rated. M ratings are 17+ the ESRB rating for 18+ is AO.

      M ratings are for minors, AO is for adults.

      You need to ID to buy an AO game, you do not for M unless it’s a individual store policy.

      Due to anti porn sentiment and stores refusing to carry porn. Only 24 games have ever gotten the AO rating

      It’s considered a death flag.

      It’s much like how the Deadpool movie was R rated instead of pg13. This was considered a huge risk cause R rates movies don’t make money was the common theory.

      But even then R rating is also for minors. Movies have the NC-17 rating which is for 18+ and thus only adults. This would be the AO rating in games.

      Stores and public facing businesses are so piss scared of having adult rated content even if it’s not porn, just because of the vague idea that adult only content HAS to be porn cause “what else would it be”

      That rating systems have undermined their very purpose and become fucking useless. It’s why everything is only M rated instead of being AO when it really should be.

      • tinned_tomatoes@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        It’s not really relevant as the UK rating system doesn’t have M or AO clarifications. The game is rated 18 so it’s for adults only.

    • themachinestops@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      This falls on the parents instead because of dumb laws every one has to deal with this, I just hope that not all countries are this insane:

      users in the UK have had to take photos of themselves and upload it to a service that uses AI to guess their age. Or, send in photos of ID such as passports or driving licenses.

  • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 days ago

    guess ill be pirating the next one, since there will be no online mode.

  • AlphaOmega@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    4 days ago

    Can you even call it GTA online if there aren’t a dozen 12 year olds running around screaming, “N***** and F*****”.

  • Yggstyle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    4 days ago

    Maybe I’m dating myself but this is the same company that released state of emergency for the PS2? That game you could literally mow down people in a mall with a mini gun?

    They were worried about “the children?” News to me.

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      My mum enjoyed the bonus level in the mall where you could just kill like 100 people as fast as you could.

      Her favourite weapon is the flamethrower.

      Her first reaction to the game was “that’s disgusting”, but I let her have a go and suddenly she was toasting a whole crowd and loving every minute of it.

  • Matriks404@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    The thing with age verification is that I don’t think it’s a bad thing if done securely, but still it still makes me sad, because Internet will never be the same with it. In the end it will be only few big websites who can afford to care about Internet regulation.

    Well, after all maybe it’s time to switch to Gemini protocol, they are not going to regulate that!

  • vxx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 days ago

    The same parents that allow their children to play these games now will allow them to play then.

    This will just make me not want to play these games.

    • seralth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      Or just start fucking using the AO rating.

      GTA should have a fucking AO rating but because of money no game gets more then an M rating making the entire system pointless.

    • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      5 days ago

      If we’re going to government age verification everywhere just get rid of fucking ESRB and content ratings

      This is a game made in Scotland, ESRB is a voluntary US based system.

      • Thunderbird4@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Yes, it’s voluntary and self-imposed by the game industry to avoid exactly this kind of nanny-state bullshit. Ergo, if governments proceed with the bullshit anyway, then there’s no longer a need for the ESRB or PEGI.

  • Joelk111@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    What about disabling the shitty anti-cheat or even just enabling it on Linux so I, as a 27yo, can play the damn game?