Supporting what they did is free speech. That’s the whole damn point of free speech and it’s legitimately insane that in the UK the government just gets to arrest you for that.
That’s a crime for the people who broke into a base, not a reason to ban an entire organization. Lots of activist organizations have had members do illegal things. If that’s all it takes for the government to ban them, that’s an easy bar to manufacture and/or selectively activate.
That’s a crime for the people who broke into a base, not a reason to ban an entire organization. Lots of activist organizations have had members do illegal things. If that’s all it takes for the government to ban them, that’s an easy bar to manufacture and/or selectively activate.
We’re on a message board giving our opinions. You’re happy to definitively say what is and isn’t free speech then come back with a dumb response about how the court will decide whether an contradictory opinion is valid. I’m not taking to the UK courts. I’m stating a principle, which is already being violated by this anti-free speech government. Law does not determine correctness.
Those people know the risks still do it for morality and again the uk is participating in a genocide if the uk do not respect international laws why do you expect people to respect uk laws
“Charged with supporting” RIP democracy.
Palestine Action was banned after they breached a UK military base
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/jun/20/pro-palestine-protesters-deface-two-aircraft-raf-brize-norton
https://edition.cnn.com/2025/06/20/uk/palestine-action-protest-uk-airbase-security-breach-intl
Free Speech is important. But what they did isn’t free speech.
Supporting what they did is free speech. That’s the whole damn point of free speech and it’s legitimately insane that in the UK the government just gets to arrest you for that.
That’s a crime for the people who broke into a base, not a reason to ban an entire organization. Lots of activist organizations have had members do illegal things. If that’s all it takes for the government to ban them, that’s an easy bar to manufacture and/or selectively activate.
Their lawyer can appeal the decision in court.
We’re on a message board giving our opinions. You’re happy to definitively say what is and isn’t free speech then come back with a dumb response about how the court will decide whether an contradictory opinion is valid. I’m not taking to the UK courts. I’m stating a principle, which is already being violated by this anti-free speech government. Law does not determine correctness.
For trying to stop a genocide that the uk is complicit with.
If you start breaking into military bases to target jets, consider yourself lucky you don’t get shot.
Those people know the risks still do it for morality and again the uk is participating in a genocide if the uk do not respect international laws why do you expect people to respect uk laws
In Britain, you can sue the Government if you think the government is breaking the law.
https://dpglaw.co.uk/uk-arms-exports-to-israel-high-court-judgment/
Also, what country do you think is respecting international law? Should citizens of all countries start attacking military bases? How does that end?
sure
better world, probably.