• tb_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      They want this because it entrenches them yet further. More of this kind of regulations makes it more difficult for newcomers to comply with everything.

      Also I’m sure they’d love to be the one to hover up all of your data.

  • Jarvis2323@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Since all TV’s are smart TV’s with an OS this means age verification to watch TV? I think that’s a message that will resonate with the average consumer on what is wrong with this bill

  • deathbird@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Primary Josh Gottheimer. Write in anyone else against him. Vote against him or withhold voting at all in the general.

    Do not signal that this is tolerated.

        • unitedwithme@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Ohhh, well… Yikes. I think they hop on board without truly understanding what they’re signing up for. OR worse yet, they understand and are OK with it.

          • deathbird@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            Either way it’s a problem.

            If politicians are writing tech bills to deliberately undermine freedom: fire them.

            If they’re writing bad tech policy because they’re not consulting the “good guys” first, such as the FSF, EFF, or OSI: also fire them.

  • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    palintir, meta, google are all behind it. it serves 2 purposes; silencing dissidents and TRACKING women/potential mothers as brood mares.

  • AA5B@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Finally, torrenting Linux distros becomes a thing, rather than a curiosity

  • RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Palantir really wants it’s fucking database.

    All because Petey truly believes that there are demons living in the United States.

    • dev_null@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      I keep seeing comments like this, and I just need to say, no Palantir doesn’t have any database. It’s a completely evil company that makes and sells surveillance software to governments and companies. Then the governments and companies have these terrible databases that they manage with the Palantir software.

      Palantir themselves don’t do any spying or data collecting. They sell tools so that others can do that. They absolutely take the blame, but I want people to understand what’s actually happening.

    • TransNeko@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      there are demons living in the USA. all Petey has to do to find the closest one… is look in a mirror.

    • itisileclerk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      He is right, demons live in US. They are in various Federal, State, Local and Corporate functions. For example current Federal government are all demons (pretty much) and all of ICE employees. Demon here is “spirit or lesser humanity” or simly said Inhuman individuals.

    • Virtvirt588@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Don’t worry, if it all goes as planned it will even have a gender or even race verification; for your protection.

  • Vieric@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Has Bipartisan support too. The corporations want this, and both of our parties listen to them first and us a distant second. Catering to corporate wants is about the only thing the two parties can agree on. It’s probably going to pass, even if I hope it doesn’t. Buckle up my friends…

  • thax@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    A few years ago, due in part to frustration with our information environs, but also for fun, I decided not to get internet after moving to a new apartment. I didn’t have real internet for about 2 years. I did have 1GB of data per month through my phone service and used my phone or an mPCIE 4g card as an uplink for text-only internet. I simply restricted myself to JS-free applications like w3m or elinks. I quite enjoyed my time having to be very mindful of my data usage. It forced me to fully audit all the technology on my LAN.

    If this kind of legislation passes, I simply won’t pay for internet. If both ISPs and telecoms start restricting devices, then I’ll forego cell-based data as well. If public wifi spots become too restrictive, I won’t patron those spots either. I’ve accumulated more offline content on my server than I could ever consume in many lifetimes, so it really isn’t a loss. Hell, it’d be an opportunity to organize it all well, and share via meshnets. Don’t tempt me with a good time, politicians. I could save money, nerd out, and cut the noise from my information environments? Sign me up!

  • Eggyhead@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Don’t want to compete with a potentially capable Linux? Pay the government to make it illegal!

    • phutatorius@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      There’s already being work done to add an optional age-attestation in systemd.

      And note that none of the laws proposed so far are actually verifying age, they’re only requiring someone to enter it. That’s attestation, not verification. Verification will be the next tightening of the screw.